I-D Action:draft-ietf-v6ops-addr-select-req-07.txt

Internet-Drafts@ietf.org Mon, 12 May 2008 09:01 UTC

Return-Path: <owner-v6ops@ops.ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-v6ops-archive@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-v6ops-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BF6E3A684C for <ietfarch-v6ops-archive@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 12 May 2008 02:01:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Xuj2m-GkCidq for <ietfarch-v6ops-archive@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 12 May 2008 02:01:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from psg.com (psg.com [IPv6:2001:418:1::62]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6FD43A67AA for <v6ops-archive@lists.ietf.org>; Mon, 12 May 2008 02:01:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from majordom by psg.com with local (Exim 4.69 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <owner-v6ops@ops.ietf.org>) id 1JvRmy-000LQP-75 for v6ops-data@psg.com; Mon, 12 May 2008 06:45:36 +0000
Received: from [2001:1890:1112:1::20] (helo=mail.ietf.org) by psg.com with esmtp (Exim 4.69 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <root@core3.amsl.com>) id 1JvRmT-000LMd-8W for v6ops@ops.ietf.org; Mon, 12 May 2008 06:45:21 +0000
Received: by core3.amsl.com (Postfix, from userid 0) id 3E3C83A6A2E; Sun, 11 May 2008 23:45:03 -0700 (PDT)
From: Internet-Drafts@ietf.org
To: i-d-announce@ietf.org
Cc: v6ops@ops.ietf.org
Subject: I-D Action:draft-ietf-v6ops-addr-select-req-07.txt
Content-Type: Multipart/Mixed; Boundary="NextPart"
Mime-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <20080512064505.3E3C83A6A2E@core3.amsl.com>
Date: Sun, 11 May 2008 23:45:04 -0700
Sender: owner-v6ops@ops.ietf.org
Precedence: bulk

A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the IPv6 Operations Working Group of the IETF.

	Title           : Requirements for address selection mechanisms
	Author(s)       : A. Matsumoto, et al.
	Filename        : draft-ietf-v6ops-addr-select-req-07.txt
	Pages           : 9
	Date            : 2008-05-11

There are some problematic cases when using the default address
selection mechanism which RFC 3484 defines.  This document describes
additional requirements co-working with RFC 3484 to solve the

A URL for this Internet-Draft is:

Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:

Below is the data which will enable a MIME compliant mail reader
implementation to automatically retrieve the ASCII version of the