IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] Are we competitive?

Fred Baker <fredbaker.ietf@gmail.com> Thu, 28 July 2022 22:03 UTC

Return-Path: <fredbaker.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22A7CC15C50D for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 28 Jul 2022 15:03:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.109
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.109 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gH6qfU1cyHaS for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 28 Jul 2022 15:03:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pg1-x529.google.com (mail-pg1-x529.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::529]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D9A70C15C51E for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Thu, 28 Jul 2022 15:03:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pg1-x529.google.com with SMTP id bh13so2576783pgb.4 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Thu, 28 Jul 2022 15:03:54 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=to:references:message-id:content-transfer-encoding:cc:date :in-reply-to:from:subject:mime-version:from:to:cc; bh=lNQop2TdeGpkJPvuIaf+zUwuAyqrm29Z6BX6YsBvg1g=; b=AeOqm0gVZaZaZrZaQvZrS9jGCvRBHHrPfSVrlYoA22A1tYl2SvXyyPwEzb7a1RbdVI ZhqFXMJEptvEQUS7D3ApBF3qkOlEm5oJb3EGh24ml1VrLCvX4UOpmAlIDkguIkbSO6US 8LfAdWK1hY00GDeyMMHCgPmCgLW4bjbxI90pWCcmpTkpxgSu6RTOh73X0dzeKHva1qvx t7kkbbiUZaT3s4mq+YT2SRJ84hVkcoHhtqS/iw8ppnvHBxcy/8P6BpC1IBi2XeSLOguj 8J8R9sWlAIQE6E/uSVwwtNJK0nrojTKcEm/Xv+aAScxITMABiLxty03sRGWVmDwefRmb SIRg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=to:references:message-id:content-transfer-encoding:cc:date :in-reply-to:from:subject:mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc; bh=lNQop2TdeGpkJPvuIaf+zUwuAyqrm29Z6BX6YsBvg1g=; b=uhjLvzDa5MAuwKZpMdy7GySRTWtYQBdwb7aSjMyieJwx3ZrEhhk72fpYiWYbrQwl1r p0rZvoGBjetqxgaKSZFtWdA165v2D2/utaizFh4v4q7sGYynKGqH6YBmIbRYsvBd1W9L 31IFL8mSHBBBQgTmMm6LiGpjqSwXUj5lvsb4QuAPzUS2M3ZYUCXN6oMVHd3h1dW6L5o/ VrfXinvibwrQ7q9yEZXgGt+RsEbKNeB9z/Z+D7k+NpdMOwUAiE63LThN6StUTpVV3GAV NcfP9brqAVlh+XNKQtyKkhCyC4W3GAsxShaFjbfpi0vXQuSA9PXP8CiGfW+xldgwrKnf XE2Q==
X-Gm-Message-State: AJIora90BDo6nS8bBMtbH2/SXdKhIxDtBHEGyVUq0Ge/e1+OzgV8i1MP dMGCCW0cw1xhlnmca/sTPf8=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGRyM1snZ+YplNv95x/seIgn93K/eHeiMopmf7z37cLxLU6aZbh3T/zDzzaO7qfAonPNYm4jsImwWg==
X-Received: by 2002:a63:e044:0:b0:419:be58:463b with SMTP id n4-20020a63e044000000b00419be58463bmr591774pgj.504.1659045833857; Thu, 28 Jul 2022 15:03:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtpclient.apple (ip68-111-231-227.sd.sd.cox.net. [68.111.231.227]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id e18-20020a17090301d200b0016db51ca7dfsm1984342plh.15.2022.07.28.15.03.52 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 28 Jul 2022 15:03:53 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3696.120.41.1.1\))
From: Fred Baker <fredbaker.ietf@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAE=N4xcPq3CB5DDjPOk3oAqBfpJRebhXsFExSEAX_Yr3_XsSUg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2022 15:03:51 -0700
Cc: Xipengxiao <xipengxiao=40huawei.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, IPv6 Operations <v6ops@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <173F9A4D-34F1-410D-B6EE-6AC4C957A6A7@gmail.com>
References: <e4a35f0c-757a-aefa-c211-05b6015a4215@gmail.com> <YuJXbruluDmzF3RD@Space.Net> <ec68b29c62034d3e98adec9c5da45ff3@huawei.com> <25e4f9e4-e055-241c-7047-97dca8b09cc8@gmail.com> <3c35a91af90d4b82af724e7ce98378d3@huawei.com> <CAE=N4xcPq3CB5DDjPOk3oAqBfpJRebhXsFExSEAX_Yr3_XsSUg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Ed Horley <ed@hexabuild.io>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3696.120.41.1.1)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/IHYGqNm6HhTzmWlKpC6568ccTTg>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] Are we competitive?
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2022 22:03:59 -0000


> On Jul 28, 2022, at 3:00 PM, Ed Horley <ed@hexabuild.io> wrote:
> 
> I believe Rick Graziani updated IPv6 Fundamentals, Second Edition from Cisco Press in 2017. Prior to that, Tom Coffeen's IPv6 Address Planning book was published in 2014, and mine was published in Dec 2013 but I would not consider Tom or my book to be one you would necessarily use in a classroom for instruction. My question would be, are you looking for a book to teach the fundamentals of the protocol? If so, Rick's book is more than sufficient and I would not be surprised if he will be updating it for a Third Edition. If you are not looking for a fundamentals book but something else, what is it you are looking for?

And with that, what RFCs are of the most value for operators? If I'm writing a book to inform them of best practices and so on, I would want to point them to the best and say "there are lots of others out there, but read these first."

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email