Re: [v6ops] SLAAC renum: Problem Statement & Operational workarounds

"Radu-Adrian Feurdean" <ietf-wgs@radu-adrian.feurdean.net> Thu, 31 October 2019 19:16 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf-wgs@radu-adrian.feurdean.net>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2AAF120816 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 31 Oct 2019 12:16:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_NONE=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WgvgySCnCNxe for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 31 Oct 2019 12:16:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out4-smtp.messagingengine.com (out4-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.28]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DA6F5120800 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Thu, 31 Oct 2019 12:16:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from compute2.internal (compute2.nyi.internal [10.202.2.42]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51D032252A for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Thu, 31 Oct 2019 15:16:13 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from imap3 ([10.202.2.53]) by compute2.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 31 Oct 2019 15:16:13 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=VdbgNsQuF/3n2g1jwuOaFM1eRhV90myiXZtcin8yb 6w=; b=V32VmomXgZ5NnYvAybiHARlBdBqMUcUUHmHQ7Dm/enAyLLvv50I4YXeQO zXS8ru8MZwpFrVNIqrprubfThE92/QOnwX/45buNNI8iVgwrQcpc5yfVjvsongBC P/GWzQzkOx4i3nTRqMDi/gfWn6p5Rgkq10+ARi52/0ubjjJ/UJV8UkGPMST5dArZ N++wDtaN8u4yky85wFH0duxBw5TDTk0J8b56vBsWWUgrGLh2v2EfBJnGeMmpRnBw TQo4ysiWPB2Y9Nb9BTfnWS+RCc/IheoW4e6n62hssTXOPm5caGzJtCkm6gVNjkEY Wl6aoWwNnHskS1RdGNYDriJJiRyxw==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:_TK7XXzYCb976R-I9YcOpT_pYtnG6ggjUKaXfqsN-i5JEyZWuvnZ7g>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedufedruddthedguddvudcutefuodetggdotefrod ftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfgh necuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecunecujfgurhepofgfggfkjghffffhvffutgfgse htqhertderreejnecuhfhrohhmpedftfgrughuqdetughrihgrnhcuhfgvuhhruggvrghn fdcuoehivghtfhdqfihgshesrhgrughuqdgrughrihgrnhdrfhgvuhhruggvrghnrdhnvg htqeenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepihgvthhfqdifghhssehrrgguuhdqrggu rhhirghnrdhfvghurhguvggrnhdrnhgvthenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedt
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:_TK7XVQMAyOjzbac7tqZ17T9L8l3-W92eOVhkqUJTrHL0iK4LMd9Jw> <xmx:_TK7XcIgkG5YUwmF8kFgPeu5rjuAOJ_mpuf0-XKmsmGdV20duB0cuw> <xmx:_TK7XUVPFsJMml7Q1Eq-izRRs-cioJp5rFaEfI7ZSs-A5o4DuyXckQ> <xmx:_TK7XfL8VRiNyVWONQm7x3oikCwh4tMJM2JX_8_rjOxKRmGWc6l9Ew>
Received: by mailuser.nyi.internal (Postfix, from userid 501) id DC6084E009F; Thu, 31 Oct 2019 15:16:12 -0400 (EDT)
X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface
User-Agent: Cyrus-JMAP/3.1.7-509-ge3ec61c-fmstable-20191030v1
Mime-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <804cba98-1f87-4fb8-abad-df0d80d25945@www.fastmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <AC9B4576-1F1F-49CA-AE62-066C2CBDC2E4@delong.com>
References: <85b1ef40-f107-0ece-3e71-377f4d22dd46@si6networks.com> <bb750ae0-940c-2477-fc6b-cea38af777e5@gmail.com> <9dfd5e47-c593-4145-b530-74fb0f4155ed@www.fastmail.com> <f2d0633e-6b99-7d64-d718-b4b24c73b494@gmail.com> <6ABAC3D7-30EA-4ECD-8B5F-A04309C208CE@delong.com> <55508c99-42b7-5c22-5c56-306a41b51bf3@gmail.com> <AC9B4576-1F1F-49CA-AE62-066C2CBDC2E4@delong.com>
Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2019 20:15:19 +0100
From: "Radu-Adrian Feurdean" <ietf-wgs@radu-adrian.feurdean.net>
To: v6ops@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain;charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/J5Pb-nZ4Te-NpOcZziDzY9KKSSw>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] SLAAC renum: Problem Statement & Operational workarounds
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2019 19:16:17 -0000


On Thu, Oct 31, 2019, at 15:16, Owen DeLong wrote:
> 
> 
> > On Oct 31, 2019, at 3:02 AM, Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com> wrote:
> > 
> > 
> 
> > Le 31/10/2019 à 04:05, Owen DeLong a écrit :
> >> 8 /64s is a /61.
> > Right, I guess 8 /64s is a /61 because 2^3 is 8, and 3+61 is 64.
> 
> > 
> Well, a /60 would include not only ce10..ce17, but also ce18, ce19, 
> ce1a, ce1b, ce1c, ce1d, ce1e, and ce1f.

They DO provision a /60 per customer, they just keep half of it for their own use. The separate STB box was known to make use of it at some moment on the past. It may still be the case... probably... 

> 256 /64s is a /56.
> You should be getting 65,536 /64s (a /48) and if I were you, I would 
> complain to any ISP that gave me less.I 

Legacy of their past 64rd deployment. 

-- 
R-A.F.