Re: [v6ops] FW: New Version Notification for draft-vf-v6ops-ipv6-deployment-00.txt

Giuseppe Fioccola <giuseppe.fioccola@huawei.com> Thu, 15 October 2020 16:12 UTC

Return-Path: <giuseppe.fioccola@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8DE953A08B2; Thu, 15 Oct 2020 09:12:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id imfowTwLiDdJ; Thu, 15 Oct 2020 09:12:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [185.176.76.210]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CBAF53A08AF; Thu, 15 Oct 2020 09:12:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lhreml731-chm.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.18.7.108]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id F2D10A2B230C978E21FE; Thu, 15 Oct 2020 17:12:09 +0100 (IST)
Received: from fraeml711-chm.china.huawei.com (10.206.15.60) by lhreml731-chm.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.82) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.1913.5; Thu, 15 Oct 2020 17:12:09 +0100
Received: from fraeml714-chm.china.huawei.com (10.206.15.33) by fraeml711-chm.china.huawei.com (10.206.15.60) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.1913.5; Thu, 15 Oct 2020 18:12:09 +0200
Received: from fraeml714-chm.china.huawei.com ([10.206.15.33]) by fraeml714-chm.china.huawei.com ([10.206.15.33]) with mapi id 15.01.1913.007; Thu, 15 Oct 2020 18:12:09 +0200
From: Giuseppe Fioccola <giuseppe.fioccola@huawei.com>
To: Azael Fernandez Alcantara <afaza@unam.mx>
CC: "v6ops@ietf.org" <v6ops@ietf.org>, "draft-vf-v6ops-ipv6-deployment@ietf.org" <draft-vf-v6ops-ipv6-deployment@ietf.org>, "v6ops-chairs@ietf.org" <v6ops-chairs@ietf.org>, Azael <azael@redes.unam.mx>
Thread-Topic: [v6ops] FW: New Version Notification for draft-vf-v6ops-ipv6-deployment-00.txt
Thread-Index: AQHWovdnldXGZSP3DkOI6d1DuX9RaamYqeYw////XwCAAAGkAIAAJJ3g
Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2020 16:12:09 +0000
Message-ID: <459d2a3f18d549ac8c89caac1f8be311@huawei.com>
References: <160276863269.12225.15313625467391617602@ietfa.amsl.com> <19408462e0bf4f0a8776820bef8d9130@huawei.com> <alpine.LRH.2.21.2010151026120.5904@pine.servidores.unam.mx> <alpine.LRH.2.21.2010151036010.5904@pine.servidores.unam.mx>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LRH.2.21.2010151036010.5904@pine.servidores.unam.mx>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.48.208.55]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/JF-6ZxDUwgUztIi8t72xCbMWu-4>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] FW: New Version Notification for draft-vf-v6ops-ipv6-deployment-00.txt
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2020 16:12:14 -0000

Hi Azael,
Yes, this is a good point. Some network operators already noted an increase of IPv6 traffic during the pandemic period, considering the greater use of video and streaming services provided mainly in IPv6 by most of the biggest content providers.
But, other than that, it is worth investigating further this aspect to check, for example, whether there is a positive effect on the IPv6 performance and so on.

Regards,

Giuseppe

-----Original Message-----
From: Azael Fernandez Alcantara [mailto:afaza@unam.mx] 
Sent: Thursday, October 15, 2020 5:38 PM
To: Giuseppe Fioccola <giuseppe.fioccola@huawei.com>
Cc: v6ops@ietf.org; draft-vf-v6ops-ipv6-deployment@ietf.org; v6ops-chairs@ietf.org; Azael <azael@redes.unam.mx>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] FW: New Version Notification for draft-vf-v6ops-ipv6-deployment-00.txt


That it is mentioned ones in the ETSI paper.
But now it would be very useful until the end of confination periods.

BEST,
SALUDOS,
_______
UNAM
Azael


On Thu, 15 Oct 2020, Azael Fernandez Alcantara wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I think, it would be very useful to include the effects of, and to, 
> IPv6 deployment in the context of the Pandemic period we are facing.
>
>
> BEST,
> SALUDOS,
> _______
> UNAM
> Azael
>
>
> On Thu, 15 Oct 2020, Giuseppe Fioccola wrote:
>
>>  Dear All,
>>  We have just posted a new informational draft on IPv6 deployment. 
>> This  document aims to provide the global picture of IPv6 to show how 
>> IPv6 is  growing and also an overview of IPv6 transition deployment 
>> status. Indeed,  it is reported a survey of the deployed IPv6 
>> transition technologies. The  document also aims to analyze the 
>> challenges and therefore encourage  actions and more investigations 
>> on some areas that are still under  discussion.
>>
>>  For those interested to collaborate on this topic, we are open to 
>> discuss  and work together to improve the document.
>>
>>  Your inputs and comments are welcome.
>>
>>  Best Regards,
>>
>>  Giuseppe and Paolo
>>
>>  -----Original Message-----
>>  From: internet-drafts@ietf.org [mailto:internet-drafts@ietf.org]
>>  Sent: Thursday, October 15, 2020 3:31 PM
>>  To: Paolo Volpato <paolo.volpato@huawei.com>; Giuseppe Fioccola  
>> <giuseppe.fioccola@huawei.com>
>>  Subject: New Version Notification for  
>> draft-vf-v6ops-ipv6-deployment-00.txt
>> 
>>
>>  A new version of I-D, draft-vf-v6ops-ipv6-deployment-00.txt
>>  has been successfully submitted by Giuseppe Fioccola and posted to 
>> the  IETF repository.
>>
>>  Name:		draft-vf-v6ops-ipv6-deployment
>>  Revision:	00
>>  Title:		IPv6 Transition Deployment Status
>>  Document date:	2020-10-15
>>  Group:		Individual Submission
>>  Pages:		24
>>  URL:
>>  
>> https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-vf-v6ops-ipv6-deployment-00.txt
>>  Status:
>>  https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-vf-v6ops-ipv6-deployment/
>> Htmlized:        https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-vf-v6ops-ipv6-deployment
>> Htmlized:        https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-vf-v6ops-ipv6-deployment-00
>> 
>>
>>  Abstract:
>>    Looking globally, IPv6 is growing faster than IPv4 and this means
>>    that the collective wisdom of the networking industry has selected
>>    IPv6 for the future.  This document provides an overview of IPv6
>>    transition deployment status and a view on how the transition to IPv6
>>    is progressing among network operators that are introducing IPv6 or
>>    have already adopted an IPv6-only solution.  It also aims to analyze
>>    the transition challenges and therefore encourage actions and more
>>    investigations on some areas that are still under discussion.  The
>>    overall IPv6 incentives are also examined.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>
>>  Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of  
>> submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at  
>> tools.ietf.org.
>>
>>  The IETF Secretariat
>> 
>>
>>  _______________________________________________
>>  v6ops mailing list
>>  v6ops@ietf.org
>>  https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops
>> 
>