IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-ietf-v6ops-6204bis

"Hemant Singh (shemant)" <shemant@cisco.com> Thu, 20 October 2011 12:24 UTC

Return-Path: <shemant@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09B7221F8AFB for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 20 Oct 2011 05:24:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.886
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.886 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.713, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RO2Ejx+oJo92 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 20 Oct 2011 05:24:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-6.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-6.cisco.com [173.37.86.77]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFB5C21F8B06 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Thu, 20 Oct 2011 05:24:48 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=shemant@cisco.com; l=3288; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1319113489; x=1320323089; h=mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:subject:date: message-id:in-reply-to:references:from:to:cc; bh=0BLnld+ON8ncJrK3kfY0bkU2CgfSjYq8iPm4LHRiCZI=; b=FXcl5Ro+Y31FrK3nkjtryg5VTdswpduqtfOCy8raeu91N5F1Eud3M7CS wjzqU3dnziVeM5aoJYN0nbraAG/kRwT0lOimKIDlwTykYvs6zedX50oBe FSoAM9UlycAthZ31s1C/MDAcKfl1iUmB6PBqWrBAVJ6xtdhAM8DLd70LL s=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AvQAALYSoE6tJXHB/2dsb2JhbABDmViPPoEFgW4BAQEEEgEdSQwEAgEIEQQBAQsGFwEGAUUDAQUIAgQBEggah2aXGgGePYdIYQSHUzCRMIxC
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.69,379,1315180800"; d="scan'208";a="29764287"
Received: from rcdn-core2-6.cisco.com ([173.37.113.193]) by rcdn-iport-6.cisco.com with ESMTP; 20 Oct 2011 12:24:48 +0000
Received: from xbh-rcd-302.cisco.com (xbh-rcd-302.cisco.com [72.163.63.9]) by rcdn-core2-6.cisco.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id p9KCOmS8032437; Thu, 20 Oct 2011 12:24:48 GMT
Received: from xmb-rcd-109.cisco.com ([72.163.62.151]) by xbh-rcd-302.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Thu, 20 Oct 2011 07:24:47 -0500
X-Mimeole: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2011 07:24:47 -0500
Message-ID: <5B6B2B64C9FE2A489045EEEADDAFF2C303131268@XMB-RCD-109.cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <94C682931C08B048B7A8645303FDC9F35A2DDC0DB2@PUEXCB1B.nanterre.francetelecom.fr>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: [v6ops] new draft: draft-ietf-v6ops-6204bis
Thread-Index: AcyIu2t8cEmEfoUVRZO+1VXRKDAbdgE8IbWQAAF+JmAAAQcFQAABAmmgADzIQZAAAIIVAwABTXKAABZhtKAAA4170A==
References: <5B6B2B64C9FE2A489045EEEADDAFF2C30313115B@XMB-RCD-109.cisco.com> <CAC49E75.55A41%rpenno@juniper.net> <5B6B2B64C9FE2A489045EEEADDAFF2C303131193@XMB-RCD-109.cisco.com> <94C682931C08B048B7A8645303FDC9F35A2DDC0DB2@PUEXCB1B.nanterre.francetelecom.fr>
From: "Hemant Singh (shemant)" <shemant@cisco.com>
To: mohamed.boucadair@orange.com, Reinaldo Penno <rpenno@juniper.net>, "Fred Baker (fred)" <fred@cisco.com>, Maglione Roberta <roberta.maglione@telecomitalia.it>, Alain Durand <adurand@juniper.net>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 20 Oct 2011 12:24:47.0883 (UTC) FILETIME=[41E18DB0:01CC8F23]
Cc: v6ops@ietf.org, MEILLAREC Loïc OLNC/NAD/TIP <loic.meillarec@orange.com>, draft-ietf-v6ops-6204bis@tools.ietf.org, Ullio Mario <mario.ullio@telecomitalia.it>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-ietf-v6ops-6204bis
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2011 12:24:50 -0000

Med,  DanW, and Reinaldo,

Thanks for all your clarifications.  The rfc6204bis document does not support UPnP for a feature and that is why I was wondering what would be the use case for PCP if the host behind the CE router does not support PCP.  Now that I know you all are referring to UPnP, Barbara has already responded that she is willing to consider PCP client on the CE router WAN with UPnP.  I agree with her.  What IPv6 UPnP document is in RFC form right now for the CE router to consider UPnP?

Regards,

Hemant


-----Original Message-----
From: mohamed.boucadair@orange.com [mailto:mohamed.boucadair@orange.com] 
Sent: Thursday, October 20, 2011 6:01 AM
To: Hemant Singh (shemant); Reinaldo Penno; Fred Baker (fred); Maglione Roberta; draft-ietf-pcp-base@tools.ietf.org; pcp-chairs@tools.ietf.org
Cc: v6ops@ietf.org; Ullio Mario; draft-ietf-v6ops-6204bis@tools.ietf.org; MEILLAREC Loïc OLNC/NAD/TIP
Subject: RE: [v6ops] new draft: draft-ietf-v6ops-6204bis

Dear Hemant,

For that case, we are considering:

* Enable a UPnP IGD/PCP Interworking function as specified for instance in: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-bpw-pcp-upnp-igd-interworking-02

* Just like current port forwarding in existing CPEs, we are envisaging to allow the configuration of port mappings using a User Interface. This will trigger PCP messages to be sent to the PCP Server controlling the DS-Lite AFTR.

For those who want to play with the PCP Client UI and IGD/PCP IWF, we made a code available at: http://opensourceaplusp.weebly.com/.

Hope this answers your question.

Cheers
Med 

-----Message d'origine-----
De : Hemant Singh (shemant) [mailto:shemant@cisco.com] 
Envoyé : jeudi 20 octobre 2011 01:14
À : Reinaldo Penno; BOUCADAIR Mohamed OLNC/NAD/TIP; Fred Baker (fred); Maglione Roberta; draft-ietf-pcp-base@tools.ietf.org; pcp-chairs@tools.ietf.org
Cc : v6ops@ietf.org; Ullio Mario; draft-ietf-v6ops-6204bis@tools.ietf.org; MEILLAREC Loïc OLNC/NAD/TIP
Objet : RE: [v6ops] new draft: draft-ietf-v6ops-6204bis

Reinaldo,

Thanks, understood.  However, my question to the DS-Lite folks is still not answered because I was told by them that DS-Lite needs PCP.  So then I asked what if the Windows host behind the CE router does not support a PCP client, then what is the PCP server/proxy inside the CE router do for DS-Lite?

Thus my question is still un-answered.

Hemant

-----Original Message-----
From: Reinaldo Penno [mailto:rpenno@juniper.net] 
Sent: Wednesday, October 19, 2011 6:34 PM
To: Hemant Singh (shemant); mohamed.boucadair@orange.com; Fred Baker (fred); Maglione Roberta; draft-ietf-pcp-base@tools.ietf.org; pcp-chairs@tools.ietf.org
Cc: v6ops@ietf.org; Ullio Mario; draft-ietf-v6ops-6204bis@tools.ietf.org; MEILLAREC Loïc OLNC/NAD/TIP
Subject: Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-ietf-v6ops-6204bis

If windows does not implement PCP Client then the option is to implement:

- UPnP/NAT-PMP - PCP IWF

http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-bpw-pcp-upnp-igd-interworking-02

I mean, assuming there is an application that wants to open ports.

Thanks,

Reinaldo

On 10/19/11 3:21 PM, "Hemant Singh (shemant)" <shemant@cisco.com> wrote:

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email