Re: [v6ops] As promised...

Jason Fesler <jfesler@gigo.com> Thu, 23 July 2015 21:50 UTC

Return-Path: <jfesler@gigo.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5553F1A87B9 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 23 Jul 2015 14:50:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.979
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.979 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id C-znt-NLoSuj for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 23 Jul 2015 14:50:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-oi0-f44.google.com (mail-oi0-f44.google.com [209.85.218.44]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3A8F41AD0D0 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Thu, 23 Jul 2015 14:50:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by oigd21 with SMTP id d21so5980038oig.1 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Thu, 23 Jul 2015 14:50:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=JvXsYbG/PVPsCefOWc+dQZjiwwakK5aOjixBYXo2MAo=; b=Xd9aluB2frpkld3WYZmu0XDvXSamVITkACboYLYfec/oarY2+rqdrfQyFUi8ShqIaA rAsqPRipvkPmB0SMLueaS2xqZS6PmrvCYU7CRWKy/Fv6JfiXD5nzLV+zF1YN6/AMHw6C MRDbK7y010z3p3PK0FbJ7C38SYVOg0Pd4C6/XXii02EW20rxp21mEH/rxivqNvj9hZDz jEsemJ23FUP3KjyFxlq5FKBH9Mc8wtiOibL1kW/5UOkDbI3zJ/2IqcZSVwk0OmINB/Hs mUQfw/9/3vwD8+aT6ok4IC60+mTd25ejXzGAZFZUdeBGJ9xauTUQC8SG5rbPIuy+cUoj HFJg==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkBUfLBEIbc/CNocvI8s25NrnonurX9rg+5SmPVnRakFTbnbFRO6LfhOQkGF7QbhPdUdzZE
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.202.78.72 with SMTP id c69mr10709226oib.130.1437688204676; Thu, 23 Jul 2015 14:50:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.202.239.86 with HTTP; Thu, 23 Jul 2015 14:50:04 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAM86=bfaeu7T+wjYc1Xe5B2Kzkp6sDz==C0dQ9bcY0yhrBL=mA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <E8058299-E0DF-487A-BAB5-31B7A5EAC3B9@cisco.com> <CAM86=bfaeu7T+wjYc1Xe5B2Kzkp6sDz==C0dQ9bcY0yhrBL=mA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2015 14:50:04 -0700
Message-ID: <CADCiYHBmua4VN4QeyP3F_cPXxCtjn8H=YBdGWLtR3L3uVhtSdg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Jason Fesler <jfesler@gigo.com>
To: Francisco Paletta <francisco@assembler.com.br>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/JRjvsHSzha5izUhY6YloCKZHtA0>
Cc: v6ops list <v6ops@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] As promised...
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2015 21:50:17 -0000

On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 10:39 AM, Francisco Paletta
<francisco@assembler.com.br> wrote:
> I believe it's a good "best practice".

+1.   We use unicast responses at $dayjob, across a variety of
devices, and see no harmful effects. It has helped keep
multicast/broadcast volume over the radio down to manageable levels;
and as a side effect, helped with keeping people's pocket phones from
catching fire.