IETF Logo Mail Archive

[v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-balanced-ipv6-security WGLC

Fred Baker <fred@cisco.com> Sun, 10 November 2013 19:00 UTC

Return-Path: <fred@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7CA7921E8133 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 10 Nov 2013 11:00:19 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -110.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-110.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RJYFwEmajDI6 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 10 Nov 2013 11:00:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mtv-iport-2.cisco.com (mtv-iport-2.cisco.com [173.36.130.13]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0E5321E80F8 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Sun, 10 Nov 2013 11:00:14 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=634; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1384110014; x=1385319614; h=date:from:message-id:to:subject:cc; bh=RwgnPlwjYFglIuBocMVuu2d+pZDZJjZSbjd+V4w6A8E=; b=KMASuJ6YLFWx62DdP8V7bl9/NMkzkTBBFrnCCfmRQrktH1m6if6gu01O IIBcOcoJ/OZPUamGlqjlJQG3fKkGY8tnXTqTrqF3Sj2doOVxiSEFnH4Bf O4RAmCd1uTCC+bd6bWnYW8e7bynW5/gX+eoryu6SSel4hwzeFFRv/dKc9 I=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Ao4GANXWf1KrRDoG/2dsb2JhbABZgwc4rToBkieBJxZ0gxEUPDSIYQ69AY9nHYQaA4lCj3yQW4NH
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.93,673,1378857600"; d="scan'208";a="97167033"
Received: from mtv-core-1.cisco.com ([171.68.58.6]) by mtv-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP; 10 Nov 2013 19:00:13 +0000
Received: from irp-view13.cisco.com (irp-view13.cisco.com [171.70.120.60]) by mtv-core-1.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id rAAJ0B3s005285 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sun, 10 Nov 2013 19:00:11 GMT
Received: from irp-view13.cisco.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by irp-view13.cisco.com (8.14.4+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id rAAJ0Bew025355; Sun, 10 Nov 2013 11:00:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from fred@localhost) by irp-view13.cisco.com (8.14.4+Sun/8.14.4/Submit) id rAAJ0AR6025350; Sun, 10 Nov 2013 11:00:10 -0800 (PST)
Date: Sun, 10 Nov 2013 11:00:10 -0800
From: Fred Baker <fred@cisco.com>
Message-Id: <201311101900.rAAJ0AR6025350@irp-view13.cisco.com>
To: v6ops@ietf.org
Subject: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-balanced-ipv6-security WGLC
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 10 Nov 2013 19:00:19 -0000

This is to initiate a two week working group last call of
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-v6ops-balanced-ipv6-security.  Please read it now. If you find nits
(spelling errors, minor suggested wording changes, etc), comment to the
authors; if you find greater issues, such as disagreeing with a
statement or finding additional issues that need to be addressed,
please post your comments to the list.

We are looking specifically for comments on the importance of the
document as well as its content. If you have read the document and
believe it to be of operational utility, that is also an important
comment to make.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email