Re: [v6ops] DHCPv6/SLAAC Make Hosts Confusing-//RE: new draft: draft-liu-bonica-v6ops-dhcpv6-slaac-problem

Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com> Mon, 28 October 2013 17:46 UTC

Return-Path: <lorenzo@google.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0CA2F11E819B for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 28 Oct 2013 10:46:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.914
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.914 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.063, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OxZV7yLBB1Pz for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 28 Oct 2013 10:46:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ie0-x233.google.com (mail-ie0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c03::233]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4999A11E81A5 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Mon, 28 Oct 2013 10:46:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ie0-f179.google.com with SMTP id aq17so11569268iec.24 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Mon, 28 Oct 2013 10:46:06 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=DwvrmF4bXlK0bpJnTwnT977sli1eYMkNHt5+cpr5HIA=; b=BHsaEet2a0xAdSuzb5hJGSuLRuwKDBxjNgWlMzvl/tF6uPfKrxG0MjOVRbV5vwg0iQ e9D4kTi4MH7VU8In5NcobiR6igiC0JbdR29UNWHLsyGj8L35uNa5VegvIPoRwV3dcdGl G8bjUHofzCMHrIGSx6N+Z871PHZxLbDWCn7MWLoofhVk+hppFiElNMzH4o1dqJlZMdz7 wr9Lkc6YHMKlO9RQd6z14YMhFDZIQQ45tIkqAZx8JtvhtmzACAuSIWvSaxD3NiYJAkL8 GfBIgrVWHGbZKf6h5cziNwRVfgYNbXSKhnQAZxdPZnhf0Xt4D57YveulXUAU3hIavPjq DrHw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=DwvrmF4bXlK0bpJnTwnT977sli1eYMkNHt5+cpr5HIA=; b=R3b1+THowXCf1gxAOZgMT6VTTPnnHuDJjT5tfnyUvkCxOVPv2qnpZuz0rLQESLBmuw hmH+EJjiEKRRfNWyjNchXwXVpxT6kViiWLQ+yIGOCGfmsSnlOETPFSvGVDboedX1HN60 cgy15SuukFYcPRpx5V9Op9feIdL7F39kUB3oFPWqQXK/UlAFu1HKFqPK8iAGJHwSV1uJ yudk4lGvQPzDn3U+5n7tfXCn5XE0mWlYQ577NOihhTrFFDEDb2IxfzUVxUUYdCAi5NFC e6YYk+OTMveoAxAj/6JVN+EAeASspZGUBCVFGHn9FUBB56wZsfxegGln+M4ztFAY0YgB Um6A==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQm3SH1bICoed8GNBqiNaRE0uyYW1gDRTSlGUYEBFwh3Js+en1yXBWJzQltoazC4Id0kYnuGnr+qKyk+2WpLoXXksIoa2tWhjJJYsZ+1WvBglSkwg8vMQdsjxOM10wWPmiYpkxt2gPIoHJbZz2X5oAGM9dHN+jTN0zV0zm7nV76WL+WD35dFMt6LpGpdles8ZmqB5qD1
X-Received: by 10.43.159.5 with SMTP id lw5mr14319362icc.22.1382982366638; Mon, 28 Oct 2013 10:46:06 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.64.86.106 with HTTP; Mon, 28 Oct 2013 10:45:45 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <73493F7B-5284-4EC8-8F72-922C68AE6FA3@nominum.com>
References: <52689EE0.3030201@inex.ie> <CE8E29EC.59EE4%victor@jvknet.com> <CAKD1Yr0ky0SSrhYz9R82bTO+GhrsBVL-_Uf-9sbYuLWKYpmi0Q@mail.gmail.com> <FC34B2F1-AC53-4B9C-8ED4-A5FAFC862DFB@conjury.org> <73493F7B-5284-4EC8-8F72-922C68AE6FA3@nominum.com>
From: Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2013 02:45:45 +0900
Message-ID: <CAKD1Yr2tpD71716gnGjVpvOczEeAXGxL=AJVyUV1_L_92y27Hg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Ted Lemon <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c1feb6b1d56f04e9d0ac00
Cc: V6OPS Working Group <v6ops@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] DHCPv6/SLAAC Make Hosts Confusing-//RE: new draft: draft-liu-bonica-v6ops-dhcpv6-slaac-problem
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2013 17:46:10 -0000

On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 2:39 AM, Ted Lemon <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com> wrote:

> FWIW, RFC 3736 was updated eight years ago with RFC 4242, which provides
> an information refresh timer.   If you aren't currently implementing that,
> you should.   Unfortunately the working group didn't think to actually say
> that 4242 updates 3736, so I'm not surprised if it's not on peoples' radar.
>

 With a minimum of 10 minutes, unfortunately.