IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-64share

Vízdal Aleš <ales.vizdal@t-mobile.cz> Thu, 24 January 2013 15:07 UTC

Return-Path: <ales.vizdal@t-mobile.cz>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6AD9221F8A79 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 24 Jan 2013 07:07:05 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.65
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.65 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.300, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_CZ=0.445, HOST_EQ_CZ=0.904, J_CHICKENPOX_26=0.6, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Dqji6GPguVLn for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 24 Jan 2013 07:07:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mailhub1.t-mobile.cz (mailhub1.t-mobile.cz [62.141.0.149]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7CB2B21F8A56 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Thu, 24 Jan 2013 07:07:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: from srvhk503.rdm.cz (unknown [10.254.92.81]) by mailhub1.t-mobile.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id C19EA285832; Thu, 24 Jan 2013 16:07:03 +0100 (CET)
Received: from SRVHKE02.rdm.cz ([fe80::94ce:8456:f6fa:86a8]) by srvhk503.rdm.cz ([fe80::a0bc:fdcc:adf9:5f66%12]) with mapi; Thu, 24 Jan 2013 16:07:03 +0100
From: Vízdal Aleš <ales.vizdal@t-mobile.cz>
To: Alexandru Petrescu <alexandru.petrescu@gmail.com>, "v6ops@ietf.org" <v6ops@ietf.org>
Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2013 16:08:21 +0100
Thread-Topic: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-64share
Thread-Index: Ac36HyypSe+lEzmBR86gAkbzyY95UAAJChDg
Message-ID: <1808340F7EC362469DDFFB112B37E2FCC6CF9C9943@SRVHKE02.rdm.cz>
References: <CAD6AjGSEOva1RzDXJqmstFk=13JnPUSWM9rQ3PmXCXPQQwcBDQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAD6AjGTQ_4KSGDcyJe_GrY052A7eWr6n_-upkggYwVL=iTSjfw@mail.gmail.com> <51010F66.5090605@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <51010F66.5090605@gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-2"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Forwarded
Subject: Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-64share
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2013 15:07:05 -0000

> -----Original Message-----
> From: v6ops-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:v6ops-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
> Alexandru Petrescu
> Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2013 11:40 AM
> To: v6ops@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-64share
> 
> Le 23/01/2013 00:48, Cameron Byrne a écrit :
> > Relevant for this thread http://prolixium.com/blog?id=984

Alex,
 
> Right; is this ipv6 MASQUERADE implementing the RFC 6296 "IPv6-to-IPv6
> Network Prefix Translation"?

there are two ip6tables modules available - ip6t_NAt that is providing
RFC6296 support that allows you to set the IPv6 prefix IPv6 packets will
be translated to and ip6t_MASQUERADE that is taking the prefix
from a defined interface (e.g. wwan0).

> If yes then I think it is relevant to aspects of the problem that
> 64share solve.  I.e. if one wants to do tethering one could use RFC6296
> instead of 64share.
> 
> This RFC could be cited and commented in the 64share draft.

Well, there is a difference as the current draft allows for /64 sharing and 
a GUA to be assigned to a host, the 6296 approach wouldn't support
it. (i am not saying that's bad, just noting it)

> Alex

Ales

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email