Re: [v6ops] IPv10 Discussion in v6ops

Lencse Gábor <lencse@hit.bme.hu> Mon, 14 September 2020 13:52 UTC

Return-Path: <lencse@hit.bme.hu>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 811FC3A03F5 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 14 Sep 2020 06:52:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Ugb3nnkIKy2T for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 14 Sep 2020 06:52:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frogstar.hit.bme.hu (frogstar.hit.bme.hu [IPv6:2001:738:2001:4020::2c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5D56F3A03EF for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Mon, 14 Sep 2020 06:52:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.113] (host-79-121-42-30.kabelnet.hu [79.121.42.30]) (authenticated bits=0) by frogstar.hit.bme.hu (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id 08EDpqsh015075 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO) for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Mon, 14 Sep 2020 15:51:57 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from lencse@hit.bme.hu)
X-Authentication-Warning: frogstar.hit.bme.hu: Host host-79-121-42-30.kabelnet.hu [79.121.42.30] claimed to be [192.168.1.113]
To: v6ops@ietf.org
References: <159985752195.15551.2657932726923781035@ietfa.amsl.com> <VI1P194MB0285E344B7B3E9697E6ED608AE240@VI1P194MB0285.EURP194.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> <3FA82C44-0005-45BA-AB09-FAE63C8CD626@gmail.com> <VI1P194MB028561F81F5118ABC14967DFAE230@VI1P194MB0285.EURP194.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> <3B5995B1-CD7A-444C-AD64-37C09E46A763@thehobsons.co.uk>
From: =?UTF-8?Q?Lencse_G=c3=a1bor?= <lencse@hit.bme.hu>
Message-ID: <4fa01d01-bc2e-0f01-77f1-13dd4f6f2430@hit.bme.hu>
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2020 15:51:49 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.12.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <3B5995B1-CD7A-444C-AD64-37C09E46A763@thehobsons.co.uk>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-2; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Language: en-US
X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.102.4 at frogstar.hit.bme.hu
X-Virus-Status: Clean
Received-SPF: pass (frogstar.hit.bme.hu: authenticated connection) receiver=frogstar.hit.bme.hu; client-ip=79.121.42.30; helo=[192.168.1.113]; envelope-from=lencse@hit.bme.hu; x-software=spfmilter 2.001 http://www.acme.com/software/spfmilter/ with libspf2-1.2.10;
X-DCC--Metrics: frogstar.hit.bme.hu; whitelist
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 152.66.248.44
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/KBwanF54nawjP6FUdJdol5tEg8U>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] IPv10 Discussion in v6ops
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2020 13:52:03 -0000

Simon, you are completely right: this thing has already been discussed 
on int-area mailing list in 2017. It was pointed out that the name was 
misleading, as well as that this solution was not at all viable as an 
IPv6 transition mechanism.

I do not see any reason to reiterate the topic on this mailing list.

Best regards,

Gábor

14/09/2020 15:09 keltezéssel, Simon Hobson írta:
> Khaled Omar <eng.khaled.omar@outlook.com> wrote:
>
>>> Is it possible to reserve a slot for the IPv10 I-D to be presented completely during the v6ops wg meeting session?
>>>
>>> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-omar-ipv10-06
> I only had a quick look, but doesn't this just re-hash discussions/documentation that's already been done elsewhere ?
> Also, I think calling it IPv10 is just asking to cause confusion - it should be rejected just for that ;-)
>
> Simon
>
> _______________________________________________
> v6ops mailing list
> v6ops@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops