Re: [v6ops] v6ops

Hi fernando,

IPv10 is not an address structure, it is a “solution” that allows ipv4 and ipv6 to coexist and communicate to each others peacefully without any problems.

I was fighting to make it be used before the problem goes bigger and all of us will pay the delay cost, i’m trying to help as much as i can to make it easier for the benefits of all and move first to the solution before the problem occurs clearly.

Regards,

Khaled Omar

Get Outlook for iOS<https://aka.ms/o0ukef>
________________________________
From: Fernando Gont <fgont@si6networks.com>
Sent: Saturday, September 12, 2020 6:33:39 AM
To: Khaled Omar <eng.khaled.omar@outlook.com>; Ron Bonica <rbonica@juniper.net>
Cc: v6ops@ietf.org <v6ops@ietf.org>; v6ops-chairs@ietf.org <v6ops-chairs@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] v6ops - New Meeting Session Request for IETF 109

Hi, Khaled,

As a wg participant, may I ask how IP*v10* would be within the
charter/sphere of *v6*ops?

Thanks,
Fernando

On 11/9/20 20:42, Khaled Omar wrote:
> Hi Ron,
>
> Hope my I-D is clear for you, let me ask if we can reserve a slot for the IP-v10 I-D to be discussed during the next coming meeting so we can solve the problem that IMHO became clear for everyone even students.
>
> Good Luck,
>
> Khaled Omar
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Khaled Omar
> Sent: Friday, September 11, 2020 10:56 PM
> To: v6ops-chairs@ietf.org; v6ops@ietf.org
> Subject: RE: [v6ops] v6ops - New Meeting Session Request for IETF 109
>
> Hi V6OPS WG,
>
> Is it possible to reserve a slot for the IPv10 I-D to be presented completely during the v6ops wg meeting session?
>
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-omar-ipv10-06
>
> Best Regards,
>
> Khaled Omar
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: v6ops <v6ops-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf Of IETF Meeting Session Request Tool
> Sent: Friday, September 11, 2020 10:52 PM
> To: session-request@ietf.org
> Cc: v6ops-chairs@ietf.org; v6ops@ietf.org
> Subject: [v6ops] v6ops - New Meeting Session Request for IETF 109
>
>
>
> A new meeting session request has just been submitted by Fred Baker, a Chair of the v6ops working group.
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------
> Working Group Name: IPv6 Operations
> Area Name: Operations and Management Area Session Requester: Fred Baker
>
>
> Number of Sessions: 1
> Length of Session(s):  2 Hours
> Number of Attendees: 100
> Conflicts to Avoid:
>   Chair Conflict: spring lsr 6man intarea idr
>
>   Key Participant Conflict: rtgwg tsvarea panrg grow tsvwg
>
>
>
>
>
> People who must be present:
>    Fred Baker
>    Ron Bonica
>    Warren &quot;Ace&quot; Kumari
>
> Resources Requested:
>
> Special Requests:
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> v6ops mailing list
> v6ops@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops
>
> _______________________________________________
> v6ops mailing list
> v6ops@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops
>

--
Fernando Gont
SI6 Networks
e-mail: fgont@si6networks.com
PGP Fingerprint: 6666 31C6 D484 63B2 8FB1 E3C4 AE25 0D55 1D4E 7492