Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-slaac-renum and draft-ietf-v6ops-cpe-slaac-renum

Owen DeLong <owen@delong.com> Fri, 22 May 2020 02:49 UTC

Return-Path: <owen@delong.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A78373A085B for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 May 2020 19:49:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.099
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=delong.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tRn2XU33zMER for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 May 2020 19:49:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from owen.delong.com (owen.delong.com [IPv6:2620:0:930::200:2]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 687043A09CA for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Thu, 21 May 2020 19:48:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [IPv6:2620::930:0:cd1c:69dc:ae38:bd07] ([IPv6:2620:0:930:0:cd1c:69dc:ae38:bd07]) (authenticated bits=0) by owen.delong.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id 04M2mtuO522612 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 21 May 2020 19:48:56 -0700
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 owen.delong.com 04M2mtuO522612
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=delong.com; s=mail; t=1590115737; bh=H4SfAp+Pw1mGh3rxLicPaPhlT0+jlSjuURptwR0c1mw=; h=Subject:From:In-Reply-To:Date:Cc:References:To:From; b=N5Qx+GmQqCKBd564GCBSVEcGlPIBIJ7B1c+i1DO6jy9Y+t3+oESyCzO4fEgqO/FDC lL9uPy2Bj1K6ela0Dv+PX+ukVC9Nv3BPSsJ39kGJPYMRHIYvXKgSbKlu7XzTZeghow b48AwH02UZprSeo0+iKgapbZI9KZcta06Z05In9E=
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.11\))
From: Owen DeLong <owen@delong.com>
In-Reply-To: <f4363f0d-b01d-3875-4bad-801d2d681f41@si6networks.com>
Date: Thu, 21 May 2020 19:48:55 -0700
Cc: Philip Homburg <pch-v6ops-9@u-1.phicoh.com>, v6ops@ietf.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <09F36973-C60F-42AD-B793-0523B484C0CE@delong.com>
References: <m1jb1gz-0000MZC@stereo.hq.phicoh.net> <8aa3102e-22b1-60ed-2d99-838f3fdf1736@si6networks.com> <m1jbKVd-0000L7C@stereo.hq.phicoh.net> <4887544f-d5ae-50b8-8534-35736d471951@si6networks.com> <8B7F2541-8E82-44C3-9E8E-400139948803@delong.com> <f4363f0d-b01d-3875-4bad-801d2d681f41@si6networks.com>
To: Fernando Gont <fgont@si6networks.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.11)
X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.6.2 (owen.delong.com [IPv6:2620:0:930:0:0:0:200:2]); Thu, 21 May 2020 19:48:57 -0700 (PDT)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/KHejvJyy13UGqhXxLtrJg-QUJoI>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-slaac-renum and draft-ietf-v6ops-cpe-slaac-renum
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 22 May 2020 02:49:05 -0000

Works for me… 


Owen


> On May 20, 2020, at 19:40 , Fernando Gont <fgont@si6networks.com> wrote:
> 
> On 20/5/20 23:17, Owen DeLong wrote:
>>> The recommendations in this document have to do with what the CE Router does, by default, without human intervention.
>>> 
>>> We're not precluding CE Routers to have other knobs to do other things.
>>> 
>>> So I fail to see why you say L-15 should be "relaxed". -- L-15 is not arguing that you should or should not manually configure stuff in your CE Router.
>> I suspect he’s interpreting it (and some vendors are not unlikely to as well) to say that vendors should not allow this misconfiguration.
>> Perhaps if we add the words “by default” or something like that into the language to make it clear that this specifies only the required default behavior
>> fo the CE Router and does not preclude knobs allowing one to misconfigure their device to obtain a desired result it would address his singular concern
>> without relaxing the requirement to the point of doing substantial damage elsewhere.
> 
> Then, how about adding this to the "Introduction" section:
> 
> "This document specifies recommendations for the default behavior of CE Routers, and does not preclude the availability of configuration knobs that might allow an operator or user to manually-configure the CE Router to deviate from these recommendations"
> 
> ?
> 
> Thanks,
> -- 
> Fernando Gont
> SI6 Networks
> e-mail: fgont@si6networks.com
> PGP Fingerprint: 6666 31C6 D484 63B2 8FB1 E3C4 AE25 0D55 1D4E 7492
> 
> 
>