IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-ietf-v6ops-6204bis

SM <sm@resistor.net> Sat, 22 October 2011 22:10 UTC

Return-Path: <sm@resistor.net>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6022121F8663 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 22 Oct 2011 15:10:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.478
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.478 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.121, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7plH21kugDDB for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 22 Oct 2011 15:10:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx.ipv6.elandsys.com (mx.ipv6.elandsys.com [IPv6:2001:470:f329:1::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC52E21F85DB for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Sat, 22 Oct 2011 15:10:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from SUBMAN.resistor.net (IDENT:sm@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx.elandsys.com (8.14.4/8.14.5) with ESMTP id p9MM9nsh006695; Sat, 22 Oct 2011 15:09:52 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=opendkim.org; s=mail2010; t=1319321394; bh=ilPgmepPH3R0WbVxg4lLxelvIo96UlwZFymhHzwS5OM=; h=Message-Id:Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References: Mime-Version:Content-Type; b=tmDJI7uOwPL8Ujx00psL8Y0bZ4S+ddoiQRamiHY+9prdtujp8Hv4XV4gO7BzSF9cd HEYpGNHcQsBvUuVBuq5OoihkPa8KquFGjCF+p9w3s/56KWpNfo3CFr08cFLpXxMPVS osQjNFxQajDGc60V+K5pwGIgBab0IH0h4/hiitM4=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=resistor.net; s=mail; t=1319321394; bh=ilPgmepPH3R0WbVxg4lLxelvIo96UlwZFymhHzwS5OM=; h=Message-Id:Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References: Mime-Version:Content-Type; b=slf1NpQRjU2isoGu2SUTer4WZS3qLvkHsE1HYikhGvNHd2GEaRftKVfPxt/jCSy8r 49973eP5sVzyx3/a7MGurgYsu/tXsAzXVtsngQFWTLNree/6BlAufFz2xrnKj76/oM iFjne6PfltCDISDFl7DS3OLdGvL8qDakLlI0O+yg=
Message-Id: <6.2.5.6.2.20111022150055.0a7980c8@resistor.net>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.5.6
Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2011 15:04:56 -0700
To: christian.jacquenet@orange.com
From: SM <sm@resistor.net>
In-Reply-To: <3371_1319097243_4E9FD39B_3371_3540_1_983A1D8DA0DA5F4EB747B F34CBEE5CD14D35B8A5FF@PUEXCB1C.nanterre.francetelecom.fr>
References: <201110111355.p9BDt1M23806@ftpeng-update.cisco.com> <282BBE8A501E1F4DA9C775F964BB21FE3EB758B7A8@GRFMBX704BA020.griffon.local> <1B8E4C5A-D08B-4F37-B701-A39745136A33@cisco.com> <750BF7861EBBE048B3E648B4BB6E8F4F1FDCA4C3@crexc50p> <282BBE8A501E1F4DA9C775F964BB21FE3EB758B7AB@GRFMBX704BA020.griffon.local> <B06E5723-1EE5-4808-AE7F-3D98EB3F17CE@cisco.com> <94C682931C08B048B7A8645303FDC9F35A2DDC07B7@PUEXCB1B.nanterre.francetelecom.fr> <5B6B2B64C9FE2A489045EEEADDAFF2C303130A41@XMB-RCD-109.cisco.com> <94C682931C08B048B7A8645303FDC9F35A2DDC0801@PUEXCB1B.nanterre.francetelecom.fr> <5B6B2B64C9FE2A489045EEEADDAFF2C303130AAE@XMB-RCD-109.cisco.com> <A29A998E-658F-4265-95C7-2B27EF160EEE@apple.com> <839CD7F7A30CF149B5FE4D908ADE00A139FBFBBBD0@PRVPEXVS08.corp.twcable.com> <750BF7861EBBE048B3E648B4BB6E8F4F2008CD2A@crexc50p> <94C682931C08B048B7A8645303FDC9F35A2DDC091B@PUEXCB1B.nanterre.francetelecom.fr> <750BF7861EBBE048B3E648B4BB6E8F4F2012AB59@crexc50p> <3371_1319097243_4E9FD39B_3371_3540_1_983A1D8DA0DA5F4EB747BF34CBEE5CD14D35B8A5FF@PUEXCB1C.nanterre.francetelecom.fr>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Cc: IPv6 Operations <v6ops@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-ietf-v6ops-6204bis
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2011 22:10:23 -0000

Hi Christian,
At 00:54 20-10-2011, christian.jacquenet@orange.com wrote:
>(1) Customers are indeed allowed to use off-the-shelf CPE devices, 
>as long as these CPE devices comply with what we call the "Service 
>Access Technical Specifications" (STAS in French) which document the 
>features that should/must be supported by a CPE to properly access 
>the services we provide.

Is there any publicly available documentation about the Service 
Access Technical Specifications?

Regards,
-sm

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email