Re: [v6ops] IPv10 Discussion in v6ops

Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se> Mon, 14 September 2020 18:14 UTC

Return-Path: <swmike@swm.pp.se>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3EDD53A0DFB for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 14 Sep 2020 11:14:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.099
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=swm.pp.se
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Tg3rYrv2hkFc for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 14 Sep 2020 11:14:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from uplift.swm.pp.se (ipv6.swm.pp.se [IPv6:2a00:801::f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 541C63A0EFA for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Mon, 14 Sep 2020 11:14:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by uplift.swm.pp.se (Postfix, from userid 501) id B16AEAF; Mon, 14 Sep 2020 20:14:02 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=swm.pp.se; s=mail; t=1600107242; bh=R77n6F3+BkZjbfpdPSdg3JIRrr/a/Nuu6IUmLbBmMj4=; h=Date:From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=cCGFQhVbYWCMkXuzOXZrBkhbTeFzTGzM8DLUuz9AOOkGmnPVzDYL2u9/6VYglVfdn Yu7e9OcZ3TxRr1//zjv2ES8S45OW0gWimaEFOy3pdXVFdwOv0Pcwsl1S+sEHbmiMhZ Wb6Zo7ldfj+0If/Gk1ckYat+eJr6H3lm/EHu3ouI=
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by uplift.swm.pp.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF4E09F; Mon, 14 Sep 2020 20:14:02 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2020 20:14:02 +0200 (CEST)
From: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se>
To: Khaled Omar <eng.khaled.omar@outlook.com>
cc: "v6ops@ietf.org" <v6ops@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <VI1P194MB0285C5BCF487C8D45BF0347BAE230@VI1P194MB0285.EURP194.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.20.2009142011440.20021@uplift.swm.pp.se>
References: <VI1P194MB028561F81F5118ABC14967DFAE230@VI1P194MB0285.EURP194.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> <3B5995B1-CD7A-444C-AD64-37C09E46A763@thehobsons.co.uk> <4fa01d01-bc2e-0f01-77f1-13dd4f6f2430@hit.bme.hu> <VI1P194MB0285FCDBFB6A86DF954D1782AE230@VI1P194MB0285.EURP194.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> <e0e4e5cf-1563-fca1-1388-68c8789384de@nlogic.no> <VI1P194MB0285090A6E66464C9612EE34AE230@VI1P194MB0285.EURP194.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> <a461b63d-acfc-dd07-61e4-04f38ac85c95@nlogic.no> <VI1P194MB0285F92EB7A41638CCD943BFAE230@VI1P194MB0285.EURP194.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> <f149036e-6f14-259d-66a7-6f9c6ff92207@boeddinghaus.de> <VI1P194MB02850F23AF935024E5281F15AE230@VI1P194MB0285.EURP194.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> <20200914171341.GY2485@Space.Net> <VI1P194MB0285C5BCF487C8D45BF0347BAE230@VI1P194MB0285.EURP194.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (DEB 67 2015-01-07)
Organization: People's Front Against WWW
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/KvJyZMSJuWeGOiosQyKMDIb6jgk>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] IPv10 Discussion in v6ops
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2020 18:14:39 -0000

On Mon, 14 Sep 2020, Khaled Omar wrote:

> Is there someone from any vendor (Cisco, Huawei, Juniper, etc......) 
> read the draft and interested in taking the draft forward to the 
> standard phase? Please add your names here.

Contact some (local) universities and see if someone is willing to work on 
your proposal and create a proof of concept implementation if you're not 
capable of coding it yourself.

Come back to the IETF when you have running code and share your 
experience and the discussion might be different.

Until then you'll just get the same answer.

-- 
Mikael Abrahamsson    email: swmike@swm.pp.se