IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] Fwd: 464XLAT Trial Deployment Report

Jeroen Massar <jeroen@unfix.org> Fri, 03 February 2012 20:49 UTC

Return-Path: <jeroen@unfix.org>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2131F21F85F4 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 3 Feb 2012 12:49:37 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id eYsK0SXyL5iw for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 3 Feb 2012 12:49:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: from icaras.de.unfix.org (icaras.de.unfix.org [IPv6:2a01:4f8:130:74c1:5054:ff:fec4:f7d4]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7648921F860D for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Fri, 3 Feb 2012 12:49:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: from yomi.ch.unfix.org (117-1.5-85.cust.bluewin.ch [85.5.1.117]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: jeroen) by icaras.de.unfix.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8831C801BCC3; Fri, 3 Feb 2012 21:49:23 +0100 (CET)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=unfix.org; s=DKIM2009; t=1328302173; bh=E9gGnu7PaLWREGh8FgQl9uAzpX+97h8yDR4IqxqQVuQ=; h=Message-ID:Date:From:MIME-Version:To:CC:Subject:References: In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=HUOjvOgXyVDdnFIdbcm8ZV7kBgGL9A7JQv5mD5hPLz8PzaPuFclHWwgbNm6eAIFcv w2dLu2P3b1Yo4lZzRfF9TZ0Alc/v4YWjm/OiSSrSolKe6hU3OeIPyeLQDkqN5wnzWk CqVJOKPyv8nXU3Hr3trlogkh1MFX1kkORgT+buIhFmJ6q+zFh1dhByOF89eEL9kh+W YZM4qYFl3ofE2Vy+2NNY6qQwohsebiz0prPKWbjbEyUBvFb1no10bqqOyVX61n4uwO HnrbdsrQoOPhuGgZMlGI/dGYFGrQ9aTZ59VJJuTOxk5lkg6qtsphKkucsDsYdUnlwi g7GXEm7o2SmoQ==
Message-ID: <4F2C4854.40701@unfix.org>
Date: Fri, 03 Feb 2012 21:49:24 +0100
From: Jeroen Massar <jeroen@unfix.org>
Organization: Unfix
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:10.0) Gecko/20120129 Thunderbird/10.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Fred Baker <fred@cisco.com>
References: <CAD6AjGSRUdx32arseR26RzHNtMri8Vrif3dCQmuk7B52GmoHAw@mail.gmail.com> <FBD9BBC7-A537-4ABE-ABEB-76098F1BB415@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <FBD9BBC7-A537-4ABE-ABEB-76098F1BB415@cisco.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.3.5
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: v6ops v6ops WG <v6ops@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] Fwd: 464XLAT Trial Deployment Report
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Feb 2012 20:49:37 -0000

On 2012-02-03 21:40 , Fred Baker wrote:
[..]
> I need to know what the working group, and especially the operators
> in it, wants to do with this. Do you want to adopt it as a working
> group draft? Do you want to discuss it but leave it individual? Do
> you think it belongs in another working group, and if so which? Do
> you have another opinion?

I very much appreciate the folks writing these operational reports.

I do not think they fit in the RFC process, though they are great for
discussing pro's and con's about a certain solution. IMHO They are much
better fit for the various conferences out there.

Greets,
 Jeroen

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email