Re: [v6ops] Implementation Status of PREF64

[Philip Homburg <[e-mail]>]

>    Yes, that is technically correct, and I expect most enterprises
>    don't, or at least don't want to, view Android devices as routers.
>    Also, I expect extending the network or "tethering" is not
>    acceptable behavior in a PCI or NIST-800-171 compliance contexts.
>    So, that is part of the challenge for this approach. and why
>    this may not be an acceptable replacement for IA_AN and/or IA_TA.

I wonder what they are doing the IPv4 case. It is hard stop an IPv4 device
from offering NAT to downstream devices. At least, in the case
where the enterprise does not have full control over the host.