IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] I-D Action: draft-ietf-v6ops-hbh-00.txt

Nick Hilliard <nick@foobar.org> Tue, 12 October 2021 14:14 UTC

Return-Path: <nick@foobar.org>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38A2B3A1485 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 12 Oct 2021 07:14:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cFuooD2gmRW6 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 12 Oct 2021 07:14:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.netability.ie (mail.netability.ie [IPv6:2a03:8900:0:100::5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 250823A147F for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Tue, 12 Oct 2021 07:13:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Envelope-To: v6ops@ietf.org
Received: from cupcake.local (089-101-195156.ntlworld.ie [89.101.195.156] (may be forged)) (authenticated bits=0) by mail.netability.ie (8.17.1/8.16.1) with ESMTPSA id 19CEDbO1052179 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 12 Oct 2021 15:13:38 +0100 (IST) (envelope-from nick@foobar.org)
X-Authentication-Warning: cheesecake.ibn.ie: Host 089-101-195156.ntlworld.ie [89.101.195.156] (may be forged) claimed to be cupcake.local
To: "Pengshuping (Peng Shuping)" <pengshuping@huawei.com>
Cc: "v6ops@ietf.org" <v6ops@ietf.org>
References: <163397062241.17461.12937788911173662943@ietfa.amsl.com> <e13da6f0-22b3-3378-ec7f-bd8cc588b085@foobar.org> <a72e524e76004e99b56df6c668a64901@huawei.com>
From: Nick Hilliard <nick@foobar.org>
Message-ID: <3f79eaca-102c-87f8-573c-fe258bb366b8@foobar.org>
Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2021 15:13:36 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.16; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 PostboxApp/7.0.49
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <a72e524e76004e99b56df6c668a64901@huawei.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Language: en-GB
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/LQ6if8JUsA_VPb_AKn6OCromhNA>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] I-D Action: draft-ietf-v6ops-hbh-00.txt
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2021 14:14:10 -0000

Pengshuping (Peng Shuping) wrote on 12/10/2021 02:01:
> As people suggested, this draft is positioned as a problem statement
> draft on the issues of the HBH options header only.
ok, and this is the point I'm making: we already have a problem 
statement which covers HBH issues - RFC9098, along with an attempted fix 
which is specific to HBH: draft-hinden-6man-hbh-processing.

Nick

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email