IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] The need for local-ipv4 socket transition solutions -- NAT64/DNS64 remains insufficient

James Woodyatt <jhw@nestlabs.com> Wed, 22 April 2015 18:34 UTC

Return-Path: <jhw@nestlabs.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05AB61AD1EE for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 22 Apr 2015 11:34:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.378
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.378 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3NuTg92uZTWd for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 22 Apr 2015 11:34:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wg0-x232.google.com (mail-wg0-x232.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c00::232]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 20D761AD16B for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Wed, 22 Apr 2015 11:34:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by wgin8 with SMTP id n8so255723339wgi.0 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Wed, 22 Apr 2015 11:34:02 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nestlabs.com; s=google; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=aKexKOhQsCSd8HL8V9O95+HCgdVSGRCBr6IgBQn6eZQ=; b=EYpfl7MVZBrZRc/gFVtmz9Wy1Jf7Xrf4at7zkL92lXvr0XQJ+Q6HNwyALhfCyhA5WR G8v0repjhVU9EmDr17K/BYo4S8huzL3HRUsjaN1rNXPDVgxRvK7jwpXoSAn7Sd9zD/p8 y8eeLivIfQOynbUJ64srxnAKHoervoGG/Z1Ws=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=aKexKOhQsCSd8HL8V9O95+HCgdVSGRCBr6IgBQn6eZQ=; b=AQO0t1I4T4lfHXyzdJOu7yRlhwzk1sE8JC7g8A99urPxYA8gfINI0texdbgKqPAIPH szL60foWELnDlrCC77tRA3nj30QCoqMbolqWBBGslIjKXcXHGlwHD3Npt56Sw1HN3zJT /wqCiQPVgevaB7yLY7e3Tt5pRpYxFYtuF/X7rfbA/+iWanR56W+OHsC1NkOsg0KxEE60 eE4ltXGw4RpDhedjKmhc7H2PfrhS6drL4Grhnd0zOxKAiqJyvvg1BL4OZZUyE0ZhlWOE NUCEr980KTq1qfE+QVZkZ2g5yNwYgDdAflXco6ILkqJSUakUYmAmsQCDefJmwKMNkUeT K2HQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlAODJEguQO43eVrS2dp7d/7N+wzQ3dWn3AvDojE9b7lFbGNod/+iVecQd9Z7egkXgzx9XM
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.180.73.198 with SMTP id n6mr8545968wiv.3.1429727642699; Wed, 22 Apr 2015 11:34:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.28.16.1 with HTTP; Wed, 22 Apr 2015 11:34:02 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAD6AjGR65jtZN4NV62p1XnUgoQRC+h=ELmsLcQaFTdrToMtwRA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAD6AjGT-hG-uvRQvRosrZtfrf0Nb8ne9jy=tD9oh=5zNM42Xsg@mail.gmail.com> <CAD6AjGTcKgK8W+VB1H5EQpHaYiKVYXqOz_2RS-w_CiTf9kL2CQ@mail.gmail.com> <CADhXe530+OVZrFZVaYh1-zoRDvJhUd0rf4sx6a2nO8SvKmm6zg@mail.gmail.com> <CAPi140PQ+TF0rED_bQPeS=Fj415qt0-zE2RdGnEL34PAzHyx6Q@mail.gmail.com> <CAD6AjGTjXAeMF6pw5MO2Jrf9B8LJ48D3m1YTVkdBe=_OHjtroQ@mail.gmail.com> <CADhXe51TCqU2eMP4LS3DooZxQDAPD95OVJDXbiU7qvuvKCMq+w@mail.gmail.com> <CAKD1Yr2=zc57+pOA9TFs+0azw0ZR1g67+08T=9eZPHjGXBvgFQ@mail.gmail.com> <CADhXe53T_30pj7xxwNs=mWEnd=do6oiq3KgN=U-gHLrLF-gG7Q@mail.gmail.com> <D1441574.4C168%wesley.george@twcable.com> <CAD6AjGQrzoBJrqQfKO0N8Ji=oJ-ZP6Sn88sXf=opJ6bYVmTDZg@mail.gmail.com> <552102B0.6070904@cernet.edu.cn> <35D97B17-8E83-43CF-ABEF-122572F1321A@eircom.net> <552369C8.5000801@cernet.edu.cn> <CADhXe51BDuPhc8wdKGmRiBfSnrz7PMtqYXaoDO+5cwLx_xW2tw@mail.gmail.com> <55290E26.8080500@cernet.edu.cn> <CADhXe50zz9EtNtifMh+tN9XT-jKCTJB=vsQ6uG515iddOo7f2Q@mail.gmail.com> <6536E263028723489CCD5B6821D4B21303E8C63A@UK30S005EXS06.EEAD.EEINT.CO.UK> <67A2A6E4-0603-4E84-8534-EA6C706C6D5D@lists.zabbadoz.net> <6536E263028723489CCD5B6821D4B21303E8CBAB@UK30S005EXS06.EEAD.EEINT.CO.UK> <0C3D10F1-B8AF-4097-91C6-D92CDDD5978D@nominum.com> <CAD6AjGR65jtZN4NV62p1XnUgoQRC+h=ELmsLcQaFTdrToMtwRA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2015 11:34:02 -0700
Message-ID: <CADhXe53VJeUDLpq2fpdndXF1VyPzQLTO=3LEYqbpOFmEPNbCJw@mail.gmail.com>
From: James Woodyatt <jhw@nestlabs.com>
To: IPv6 Ops WG <v6ops@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="f46d0435c06c44dfab0514546807"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/LX6qnMoGGeN_LgGAdpP2dCZ21mI>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] The need for local-ipv4 socket transition solutions -- NAT64/DNS64 remains insufficient
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2015 18:34:05 -0000

On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 7:35 AM, Ca By <cb.list6@gmail.com> wrote:

>
> [...]  So what is an ipv4-poor network to do? [...]
>

I thought this thread was about what the IETF should recommend everyone to
do.


-- 
james woodyatt <jhw@nestlabs.com>
Nest Labs, Communications Engineering

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email