IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] Flash renumbering

Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com> Thu, 24 September 2020 15:21 UTC

Return-Path: <mellon@fugue.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31C3F3A0E06 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 24 Sep 2020 08:21:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id f59nDqecBW5C for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 24 Sep 2020 08:21:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qv1-xf32.google.com (mail-qv1-xf32.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::f32]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 491223A0DE8 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Thu, 24 Sep 2020 08:21:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qv1-xf32.google.com with SMTP id cy2so2097912qvb.0 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Thu, 24 Sep 2020 08:21:02 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=content-transfer-encoding:from:mime-version:subject:date:message-id :references:cc:in-reply-to:to; bh=DQcggVezBovmcw5dbZzFnph3ThWtFxzuTiHXozQpxas=; b=CFR8pbTuAuhHUZ0Y4CzWZD+q70GkhlYBhLueGxdZ1AlOdiE3ng62bDUpeZWJOYpH5V g9xV+C9PN3j+e4TucilkAmMSQ1uLnqn/tzq0Kj+X7jl9mkd24c703z1pQHnXGcGYaqJV BJq8YsKEsJLPSTLnRfEcjAPoNgzB9Aq/rvcr/6ftV+aKUvypalaAcN6G2M3cFjB6IiPm Gie8kR1hD5VAxMju9GBkodEJcxeez2bxbPyNQQf3zgPzhJietXwjvcKik+uedYLbgr5D hRBoH/a6Kf+iLJ9ym/NGTYEU06mmohXwRbvHP6zRDJMI+gOHAwq/TCDrbH+JOYKQPUyB gmTw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:content-transfer-encoding:from:mime-version :subject:date:message-id:references:cc:in-reply-to:to; bh=DQcggVezBovmcw5dbZzFnph3ThWtFxzuTiHXozQpxas=; b=LuKX/fGy80ILNFHPlu03udAGweCDwmAjwP0+zql2qfyhQ1Bn3OxajCY8TPBdnEouSw 6ksOC0y2IxILGAhRqybrjaI/G4k0qn2Dc9Yho/k4kq0soRRZrUEtu1hV4NeNpUvSesUa SU0c40gGVdQinvDVzxB6UqGGHOE5/JdGu/4i7MJUYxkiMP1F2camDlC7WzS822F82PNc WAsQjsQF4iMLjuSYTi9FiKxhOmqJIlmLsaOV/kgYkcoOEU6cBGiAhcSCChPbec3XQX8D H72Ts8WSMsbn9gy995Yp0jYPKRtGc1ukiAuwI+ilfe9+xj6TvCQ0sjeYdGHpevf/MI2H v2fg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531qW+ESz9EOh9FDlxZ2qisK+CoNkN7pM1Q9SpmusP4wYMF8RK3M LtVRHxmWdujxSqT2gKqByimPhO0Y01yDrQ==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwuSX+JGEk4Hd3gu6jUWNuTaGbxiYY94SxMG+cjUwqVr75Ie39bRVkCFZNrfTFA5GosZRrJcQ==
X-Received: by 2002:a0c:a990:: with SMTP id a16mr5650318qvb.59.1600960860771; Thu, 24 Sep 2020 08:21:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost.localdomain (c-24-91-177-160.hsd1.nh.comcast.net. [24.91.177.160]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id b199sm2237120qkg.116.2020.09.24.08.20.59 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 24 Sep 2020 08:20:59 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
From: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2020 11:20:58 -0400
Message-Id: <AD9EE51D-4ED5-4185-8EA2-685F6F1E572F@fugue.com>
References: <m1kLSoi-0000HMC@stereo.hq.phicoh.net>
Cc: v6ops@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <m1kLSoi-0000HMC@stereo.hq.phicoh.net>
To: Philip Homburg <pch-v6ops-9@u-1.phicoh.com>
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (18A373)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/LY0vmWRmQh-iMGdMLqrX7p-bntI>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] Flash renumbering
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2020 15:21:04 -0000

Right, if your cpe router gets a /56 it can do dhcp internally. The network can be layered by having routers that done have subdividable delegations forward the PD request north and the answer back south. There is nothing in the DHCPv6 rfc about PD only working across admin boundaries. 

> On Sep 24, 2020, at 11:06, Philip Homburg <pch-v6ops-9@u-1.phicoh.com> wrote:
> 
> 
>> 
>> What use of DHCP PD are you referring to here?
>> DHCP PD is only defined to work across administrative boundaries.
>> "Hierarchical DHCP PD"?
> 
> In practice, CPEs offer DHCPv6 PD to downstream routers even if there is no
> clear administrative boundary.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> v6ops mailing list
> v6ops@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email