Re: [v6ops] draft-gont-6man-slaac-renum

Fred Baker <fredbaker.ietf@gmail.com> Tue, 07 May 2019 20:54 UTC

Return-Path: <fredbaker.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3ED1120179 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 7 May 2019 13:54:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id EAdWASN0NADu for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 7 May 2019 13:54:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pg1-x534.google.com (mail-pg1-x534.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::534]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D1E00120086 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Tue, 7 May 2019 13:54:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pg1-x534.google.com with SMTP id 85so8910334pgc.3 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Tue, 07 May 2019 13:54:02 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date:in-reply-to:cc:to :references; bh=NeqDJlTJRbKi/P7F3hsHfkOyXhcyG4AEAT6Z3ZYvWqs=; b=bWD5vNupwFZ0pdadUenWDTIrDoQdtw629Gk2dkLWdkm+9KJ4FsiiJNk/005ocO8Ru3 y/k+ZV4bHUlD+i9rpUbjRvKV1vjh4Z4bE7UX6ZKO8J0NZiMzuoDMXZBmJlZ8wtoELS2R pH88QgbNGgVamK3+GnkSKO+nfc0Q57jOxbT8KlVKTeHtnCetNSdmbAVvj5H1modjyHoQ MPGXiKEHM3fT0voXaOk+Cp/P/iNjpEeWvb7vqSVWTmIiObgKZJ1wdFPiREb6tS7EcSwT yBjnK92m8OoRkcsyPatZKmAC4LA5SFh9wN2fQfOMv0b1qHrV/pEWEccQLJImXwsReF3P CJ6Q==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date :in-reply-to:cc:to:references; bh=NeqDJlTJRbKi/P7F3hsHfkOyXhcyG4AEAT6Z3ZYvWqs=; b=UotmYh5oAdxVdHq6U+Ga1Ebt2Atd1O8e6isKCkQ4tjw/AH2tRTAf4sMB+eUOpmybsn JFVOO5w1639Gze20ThwOuc7ufXxe2fMSqShyfpsz+ZnljIBDem18b3q+M+CsXZfCwpQX 3XKBlaIHDbpgBNo59KBxI0s1nPp8G/zyU5YYQbn7ZFiuNmDOtNVEBOspAj0+WUz6JwO8 OzDCHodqYm81kHb9Rap5LSxElkgfzjfk/OoMYOOZFFNXAbVpdLxifkka8PqtHvs7DuEB msocTH91fGbuxBDyJt2y+1eqR2lBn3lOobko9NTyEH2Fvj18aeV3l/lQD74tSx/M/5L0 leDQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAV6dAXYCGNUl4l0c9x7BH/E2V07loE+gfchnaQ0xBwH1IEK4mtT ZftN5TMjOfmkI4JDVBDptJqiDEWq
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzyT8MkHv5AjpUBBjYI5CVcEJYE/GYdsgVex6jfWzlanRA2Me6DD9u4bGbbzJNDQl+VObQFng==
X-Received: by 2002:a65:610a:: with SMTP id z10mr42447300pgu.54.1557262442275; Tue, 07 May 2019 13:54:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?IPv6:2600:8801:d004:600:891c:833:ae74:b7e5? ([2600:8801:d004:600:891c:833:ae74:b7e5]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id a129sm17979316pfa.152.2019.05.07.13.54.00 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 07 May 2019 13:54:01 -0700 (PDT)
From: Fred Baker <fredbaker.ietf@gmail.com>
Message-Id: <DDD29577-2FE2-4093-86AE-E587AC9E0C61@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_2A49E06C-1152-4BDF-9D0A-876D8A163EB2"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha512"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.11\))
Date: Tue, 07 May 2019 13:53:59 -0700
In-Reply-To: <D92ABF9B-8572-493D-AF25-A4A2AD562AD8@employees.org>
Cc: Ron Bonica <rbonica=40juniper.net@dmarc.ietf.org>, "v6ops@ietf.org" <v6ops@ietf.org>
To: Ole Troan <otroan@employees.org>, Fernando Gont <fgont@si6networks.com>, jan@go6.si
References: <BYAPR05MB42450ABFBEC5D340295E4266AE300@BYAPR05MB4245.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> <D92ABF9B-8572-493D-AF25-A4A2AD562AD8@employees.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.11)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/Lbh_0ydFVHq-ryYbBSgJwh_fsBs>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] draft-gont-6man-slaac-renum
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 May 2019 20:54:06 -0000

If you wish. I'd suggest we ask the authors to do that.

> On May 7, 2019, at 1:52 AM, Ole Troan <otroan@employees.org> wrote:
> 
> Ron,
> 
>> Each week between now and IETF 105, we will review and discuss one draft with an eye towards progressing it.
>> 
>> This week, please review and comment on draft-gont-6man-slaac-renum.
> 
> This document got lots of discussion and concerns raised in 6man/v6ops.
> There was also a side meeting on it, in Bangkok (or Prague, it's all a blur to me)
> Perhaps a start would be for the chairs/authors to summarise the issues already voiced?
> 
> Cheers,
> Ole
> _______________________________________________
> v6ops mailing list
> v6ops@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Victorious warriors win first and then go to war,
Defeated warriors go to war first and then seek to win.
     Sun Tzu