IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] New Version Notification for draft-yourtchenko-ra-dhcpv6-comparison-00.txt (fwd)

Ted Lemon <ted.lemon@nominum.com> Mon, 13 January 2014 13:04 UTC

Return-Path: <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C0D51AE15A for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 13 Jan 2014 05:04:33 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.571
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.571 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FB_INCREASE_VOL=3.629, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NMiXLjXbrioS for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 13 Jan 2014 05:04:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: from exprod7og125.obsmtp.com (exprod7og125.obsmtp.com [64.18.2.28]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB5D01ADEDC for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Mon, 13 Jan 2014 05:04:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: from shell-too.nominum.com ([64.89.228.229]) (using TLSv1) by exprod7ob125.postini.com ([64.18.6.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKUtPkVUwxogIhT6NEUX6QKnuUljpeJ/3J@postini.com; Mon, 13 Jan 2014 05:04:22 PST
Received: from archivist.nominum.com (archivist.nominum.com [64.89.228.108]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.nominum.com", Issuer "Go Daddy Secure Certification Authority" (verified OK)) by shell-too.nominum.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 962781B82E0 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Mon, 13 Jan 2014 05:04:21 -0800 (PST)
Received: from webmail.nominum.com (cas-02.win.nominum.com [64.89.228.132]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "mail.nominum.com", Issuer "Go Daddy Secure Certification Authority" (verified OK)) by archivist.nominum.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1A3D19005C; Mon, 13 Jan 2014 05:04:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: from vpna-132.vpn.nominum.com (192.168.1.10) by CAS-02.WIN.NOMINUM.COM (192.168.1.101) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.158.1; Mon, 13 Jan 2014 05:04:20 -0800
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
MIME-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.1 \(1827\))
From: Ted Lemon <ted.lemon@nominum.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAEmG1=pfg74Xz8MbdRSpMaBJ8P1doHje=01ekBmL1U8_JR9P-g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2014 08:04:21 -0500
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-ID: <036EBAD1-C459-466B-ADB5-C1A7EA5BAFC6@nominum.com>
References: <CAEmG1=rRYwJaZp3qYF47=263jFp+BLpF3H6PuS8+Fd6qinMT3g@mail.gmail.com> <71B4A0D3-B4F2-4B3C-B38E-ED7678BEA6FE@nominum.com> <CAEmG1=pfg74Xz8MbdRSpMaBJ8P1doHje=01ekBmL1U8_JR9P-g@mail.gmail.com>
To: Matthew Petach <mpetach@netflight.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1827)
X-Originating-IP: [192.168.1.10]
Cc: "v6ops@ietf.org" <v6ops@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] New Version Notification for draft-yourtchenko-ra-dhcpv6-comparison-00.txt (fwd)
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2014 13:04:33 -0000

> On Jan 13, 2014, at 2:27 AM, Matthew Petach <mpetach@netflight.com> wrote:
>> So is the problem you are trying to solve here essentially a cheap SDN solution?   Why not simply isolate the four groups of hosts onto four separate VLANs?
> That would either require rewriting the applications running on the
> hosts to use unicast communication between them, with a
> corresponding increase in the volume of traffic, or implement
> some scheme for handling non-unicast frames between
> VLANs that I'm not currently aware of.

I didn't say any of the things you said someone had said to you after this paragraph, so I won't respond to that, but could you please explain the application that drives you to use this configuration?

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email