IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] AWS ipv6-only features

Nick Buraglio <buraglio@es.net> Tue, 30 November 2021 14:22 UTC

Return-Path: <buraglio@es.net>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E8763A12EF for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 30 Nov 2021 06:22:40 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=es.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UTrDLcN8rZL4 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 30 Nov 2021 06:22:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-lj1-x22c.google.com (mail-lj1-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::22c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46D5F3A12EA for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Tue, 30 Nov 2021 06:22:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-lj1-x22c.google.com with SMTP id k23so41511258lje.1 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Tue, 30 Nov 2021 06:22:35 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=es.net; s=esnet-google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:reply-to:from:date:message-id :subject:to; bh=W24vM+zIMUQceJG7dxwg5HdX/NNLjjD0enUwaZiuKCQ=; b=Lyp8+Lbv+Izw23Z2sJrfvqUU9P8FoI4IdYhR1Aw7YDJI7Uk9VD2lqX5CEoW2iJQRyZ w5aQj7C32Q9BQoW6cUpt6GqtZXOXlscWyLqKBhAMl1kWa5WSR3hVzcztc+ud1fl+CcO2 fvetyt5YWCgnj3NvMuFfDXVC1PyWCoBTFLZac/aWNMfpyhtGUufIl5K+HwwaCQvqjkM8 qyulS/HA11/X2jqPaTZnW2dMptnhcHfqNIiyYYmwgXckHjuinAOwdsIksUSYOaGk8gQg u07LJPWrRTVHi8S6P7Id2XMFjo94dFPL98SWP3x1Ph2SB42kN2O0ULtXPHrVspU8skqv ugtw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:reply-to :from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=W24vM+zIMUQceJG7dxwg5HdX/NNLjjD0enUwaZiuKCQ=; b=EfivFrDH6HkXU0fJZo3NOtYYNimfzCZbgglzTQ3OPJqdJ2uBopodmESXpSpw6h0cyP 8nX55C0NBslUQA9HLG7StGSPdwOrzaF2ixSztYx5C+5rUVvkWZfEwYUyYjLjwrKyU26v J5pz56gUrv2V/96c5J6EQQrNeFPB0V+ZJVL+1cFSlntYKzRjMZY+mQEZDR9PcLaN/u5U pLotrWuARnzVbhlzVby1EBbX0TWjFxi0qmLctGfG8ZkGPmhDjD5ZIOa+bKRXRoyCC/eX 8BdvUhmscUEFU42FmDEP+6kauXe01UTMdp6r62nn7SBYqUSJ61SDrILCf+xcqpC92mzT 2bKg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533TbwTje+kiKC3cBVI2iJsG9Yt5hztmLzGawlQ/iT7di7NklhAP ZjtgTlEzhoWbrDAy7aJeVvMPlGqYVnb/7e75EwJi6ff1BAdM5M0fU2zX6vJm10dOERe2beR7nLk BwBfTlE90SnCAizKSHJKt2xS77HWyhwjy6peE27NMYWZ/Z7j/U43s04o1kB+6UHVipEKdjbW9A7 /UzctX
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxre+sccPrXz54XWxvqVwcPUzvsITDdhaQzuPHQQDIB/YJ6khMd8c2bAjm1TENdIkqFB18/GgsFhFCEY2oJuGQ=
X-Received: by 2002:a2e:b88d:: with SMTP id r13mr54702703ljp.362.1638282151263; Tue, 30 Nov 2021 06:22:31 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAM5+tA9JhRWfZ2VLLQnT8Mg+Xng-+Rc-oQnX8Ma5DguL2uDO8w@mail.gmail.com> <C7A86994-311E-4D94-80AE-74A15D6D62B1@delong.com> <m1mrzjf-0000GqC@stereo.hq.phicoh.net> <20211130.125337.353477644.sthaug@nethelp.no>
In-Reply-To: <20211130.125337.353477644.sthaug@nethelp.no>
Reply-To: buraglio@es.net
From: Nick Buraglio <buraglio@es.net>
Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2021 08:22:19 -0600
Message-ID: <CAM5+tA-bvwwHGCYh-F5Ueb9N0kO6muLonS9tEATBzGMdGywZTg@mail.gmail.com>
To: sthaug@nethelp.no, v6ops@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000abc7e405d20249da"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/MhO0GsPN14okP16WrHuylFAmb1Y>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] AWS ipv6-only features
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2021 14:22:41 -0000

On Tue, Nov 30, 2021 at 5:54 AM <sthaug@nethelp.no> wrote:

> > Typically a hosts gets addresses from DNS. So this suggests that people
> > create DNS RR sets that contains both GUAs and ULAs.
> >
> > Is this common practice somewhere? Do people expect that something
> sensible
> > will happen if you try that? Is it documented what should happen?
>
> Putting ULA addresses into the DNS doesn't sound like a great idea.


No argument there.


> It
> might work in your lab, I certainly don't expect it to work on the
> global Internet.
>

Of course. However, a monumental amount of production DNS exists that isn't
part of the glocal DNS infrastructure.


>
> Steinar Haug, AS2116
>
> _______________________________________________
> v6ops mailing list
> v6ops@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email