IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] Apple and IPv6, a few clarifications - ND proxy for bridging hotspots

Nick Hilliard <nick@foobar.org> Thu, 25 June 2015 09:57 UTC

Return-Path: <nick@foobar.org>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70AA61B3503 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 25 Jun 2015 02:57:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LhBeScyXxBuW for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 25 Jun 2015 02:57:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.netability.ie (mail.netability.ie [IPv6:2a03:8900:0:100::5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7A13C1B3501 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Thu, 25 Jun 2015 02:57:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Envelope-To: <v6ops@ietf.org>
Received: from crumpet.local (089-101-195154.ntlworld.ie [89.101.195.154] (may be forged)) (authenticated bits=0) by mail.netability.ie (8.15.1/8.14.9) with ESMTPSA id t5P9vm3l042734 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Thu, 25 Jun 2015 10:57:48 +0100 (IST) (envelope-from nick@foobar.org)
X-Authentication-Warning: cheesecake.netability.ie: Host 089-101-195154.ntlworld.ie [89.101.195.154] (may be forged) claimed to be crumpet.local
To: v6ops@ietf.org
References: <E1C235B5-1421-4DAF-A2F3-F963982233DF@apple.com> <1599CF94-9B35-4858-AD52-6FADC8F25671@apple.com> <558ABAC3.4010802@gmail.com> <20150624151015.GN67883@Space.Net> <558ACC2F.7060509@gmail.com> <20150624161858.GP67883@Space.Net> <20150624234129.47252313E1E5@rock.dv.isc.org> <20150625071335.GQ67883@Space.Net> <558BC2FB.3020801@gmail.com> <alpine.DEB.2.02.1506251121170.9487@uplift.swm.pp.se> <558BCFEA.8000009@gmail.com>
From: Nick Hilliard <nick@foobar.org>
Message-ID: <558BD09C.9030104@foobar.org>
Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2015 10:57:48 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.10; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <558BCFEA.8000009@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/MjBJCqPuSQ_qUwpRAzix8BDeHmk>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] Apple and IPv6, a few clarifications - ND proxy for bridging hotspots
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2015 09:57:52 -0000

On 25/06/2015 10:54, Alexandru Petrescu wrote:
> An UE implements DHCPv6-PD and the core network does not reply to PD
> requests although it replies to DHCPv6 address requests) is a violation of
> specification.

Do you have names and addresses and we'll set the protocol police on the
immediately?

Nick

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email