Re: [v6ops] Interest in energy consumption of IPv6 smartphones (vs. IPv4) (was: BCP 202, RFC 7772 on Reducing Energy Consumption of Router Advertisements)

Nabil Benamar <benamar73@gmail.com> Wed, 01 June 2016 13:05 UTC

Return-Path: <benamar73@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D7D912D1BE for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 1 Jun 2016 06:05:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.449
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.449 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id N_9lxQ6kjCtG for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 1 Jun 2016 06:05:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wm0-x230.google.com (mail-wm0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::230]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B156F12D1B8 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Wed, 1 Jun 2016 06:05:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wm0-x230.google.com with SMTP id a20so26203122wma.1 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Wed, 01 Jun 2016 06:05:38 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc; bh=wj6N8lh2FLGMbRNB87TkajEdOv2aMOUHnKPdrDRsGow=; b=x9Kf/kngbaEmHi1r8Iqo/3DrL5xiqXy71XpAjXO7DszcNSEVfrBQFF9QdJRSi5iODA iolFRScHA1mnJEcZfiQA8RwzzGlivlF9n+AiS07AqO9d5S/gk9C4sUwE0grjLTPjThbX rgi3H8ijtitdgLVgXuJZH0EZRDHZa0LjvRURpSsuI4WQabeWXGJldjD3ugleZX4LOTQR ZBsDXn7m2jwke1olMoWQlOvUYpK0JK/LDiy3+MPbZDfQFvMZV6F2IjPnBWk9v2ZX8XVJ S45SJCpC7nLa4We3HR4spER18QVIq9emnBXdf0X7gfPEedYUMA/arbwJSZpUK2Vw5/CQ /4wg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc; bh=wj6N8lh2FLGMbRNB87TkajEdOv2aMOUHnKPdrDRsGow=; b=RNZkEqQYrm22xjZ+AbZOSyYJeiapTVu9UeFQ5RxqLIwn9xbAHzPl9gc7qtAWmfo6Mo QoMdBzlJX9Ro2jiYQwRQ+fXFcGh/mlN9TGotRKWzdTF99GKzLth1ANS3ky4qBQg71X4a 4bAoIwKe+asNWGwyEbxTLIquEoEk8s9WlRriyIb/UT+K/+3aDJg2xZOACCWpvkgBShuf wyhEPzQkQEdiStno8SkPo/tkxTe0TavqOfC1ZjFcbMqQJQi6H9FhVdqmSpFAmc3nYUsi lM1a9d1m10HsgyeQg8wJy6+RFDxYuNw9RigmPq1vaER84/5/giJ8CKVN0CzOCArTp1+K TeDw==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALyK8tIFcCkj8HjqC9L5o0epNyBsXEx1ZoYBiaxTH5ghKpPCG5i3X+85xvlQBlCLMfYIgetQ4D0kDJELyjE1sw==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.28.98.138 with SMTP id w132mr3696497wmb.7.1464786337062; Wed, 01 Jun 2016 06:05:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.28.13.77 with HTTP; Wed, 1 Jun 2016 06:05:37 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <5099e169-696d-54ec-a4a7-8cc773e358c5@gmail.com>
References: <20160211191203.4120F180472@rfc-editor.org> <5099e169-696d-54ec-a4a7-8cc773e358c5@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 01 Jun 2016 14:05:37 +0100
Message-ID: <CAMugd_UnqL6R2pANJVCjcpmNM48nWa8fZsXsymXdDe_MkrJB2w@mail.gmail.com>
From: Nabil Benamar <benamar73@gmail.com>
To: Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a1148e9564aeae00534372566"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/MjavcsO4FLBL2JEQ9tDzeoiAZe8>
Cc: v6ops list <v6ops@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] Interest in energy consumption of IPv6 smartphones (vs. IPv4) (was: BCP 202, RFC 7772 on Reducing Energy Consumption of Router Advertisements)
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Jun 2016 13:05:41 -0000

Hi Alex,

Thank you for rising this issue. I'm interested in working on the energy
consumption in IPv6 and compare it with IPv4.

Best regards
Nabil Benamar
-------------------
نبيل بنعمرو

http://nabilbenamar.ipv6-lab.net/

On Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 1:40 PM, Alexandre Petrescu <
alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi v6ops,
>
> I wonder whether there may be interest in evaluating the energy
> consumption of an IPv6 application on smartphones, compared to its IPv4
> counterpart.
>
> I suspect the difference may be negligible but I am not sure.
>
> It would be good to avoid a situation in which the end user prefers IPv4
> on the smartphone because IPv6 empties the battery.
>
> Alex
>
> Le 11/02/2016 à 20:12, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org a écrit :
>
>> A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries.
>>
>>         BCP 202
>>         RFC 7772
>>
>>         Title:      Reducing Energy Consumption of Router
>>                     Advertisements
>>         Author:     A. Yourtchenko,
>>                     L. Colitti
>>         Status:     Best Current Practice
>>         Stream:     IETF
>>         Date:       February 2016
>>         Mailbox:    ayourtch@cisco.com,
>>                     lorenzo@google.com
>>         Pages:      6
>>         Characters: 12555
>>         See Also:   BCP 202
>>
>>         I-D Tag:    draft-ietf-v6ops-reducing-ra-energy-consumption-03.txt
>>
>>         URL:        https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7772
>>
>>         DOI:        http://dx.doi.org/10.17487/RFC7772
>>
>> Frequent Router Advertisement messages can severely impact host power
>> consumption.  This document recommends operational practices to avoid
>> such impact.
>>
>> This document is a product of the IPv6 Operations Working Group of the
>> IETF.
>>
>>
>> BCP: This document specifies an Internet Best Current Practices for the
>> Internet Community, and requests discussion and suggestions for
>> improvements. Distribution of this memo is unlimited.
>>
>> This announcement is sent to the IETF-Announce and rfc-dist lists.
>> To subscribe or unsubscribe, see
>>   https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce
>>   https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/rfc-dist
>>
>> For searching the RFC series, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/search
>> For downloading RFCs, see https://www.rfc-editor.org/retrieve/bulk
>>
>> Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the
>> author of the RFC in question, or to rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org.  Unless
>> specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for
>> unlimited distribution.
>>
>>
>> The RFC Editor Team
>> Association Management Solutions, LLC
>>
>>
>>