Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-yc-v6ops-solicited-ra-unicast

"Fred Baker (fred)" <fred@cisco.com> Thu, 09 July 2015 05:38 UTC

Return-Path: <fred@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69C961A9093 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 8 Jul 2015 22:38:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -114.511
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-114.511 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id A9tmUjXdhByB for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 8 Jul 2015 22:38:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-3.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-3.cisco.com [173.37.86.74]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3453B1A907A for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Wed, 8 Jul 2015 22:38:46 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1648; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1436420326; x=1437629926; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=SI8lAHav8IjVF6JZVI3ddm6/1cpicxbeWNGjJc70o2s=; b=kzO3y6G0BWeEz2seAW/I9wkqtujFU6lqAQLMOZwcosU0V0UTiiJdklD8 3wXHiD3wrcfXXaoiRk5eb5kxpiQ7zK9Bn/zAXnZSP9qOPvxMeOPOjs2Ll UDoTitYrjY05G0qDKk+fuBt0G96ANMyiCKzfKMMQqTwBNrF7tEv7wYy0w A=;
X-Files: signature.asc : 833
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0BdAwDjB55V/5RdJa1bgxKBNAa7FwmHZwKBVjgUAQEBAQEBAYEKhCMBAQEDAXkFCwIBCBguIRElAgQOBQ6ICwMKCMgKDYVTAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBF4tLgk2COQeDF4EUBZQsAYIsgVSGGYFmAZFChyImg3tvgUeBBAEBAQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.15,437,1432598400"; d="asc'?scan'208";a="13876864"
Received: from rcdn-core-12.cisco.com ([173.37.93.148]) by rcdn-iport-3.cisco.com with ESMTP; 09 Jul 2015 05:38:45 +0000
Received: from xhc-rcd-x12.cisco.com (xhc-rcd-x12.cisco.com [173.37.183.86]) by rcdn-core-12.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id t695cj7t020034 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Thu, 9 Jul 2015 05:38:45 GMT
Received: from xmb-rcd-x09.cisco.com ([169.254.9.49]) by xhc-rcd-x12.cisco.com ([173.37.183.86]) with mapi id 14.03.0195.001; Thu, 9 Jul 2015 00:38:45 -0500
From: "Fred Baker (fred)" <fred@cisco.com>
To: Mark Smith <markzzzsmith@gmail.com>
Thread-Topic: [v6ops] new draft: draft-yc-v6ops-solicited-ra-unicast
Thread-Index: AQHQugmFi8gF5iKSsEaI0kgNcCQvLg==
Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2015 05:38:44 +0000
Message-ID: <EF21B630-5D0A-415A-A93F-9058900CC80C@cisco.com>
References: <201507071147.t67Bl13m009348@irp-lnx1.cisco.com> <CAO42Z2x7mNFbB_w_+W+80pY+LeCAKXaOBXMmQvkcaMSWhwW60g@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAO42Z2x7mNFbB_w_+W+80pY+LeCAKXaOBXMmQvkcaMSWhwW60g@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.19.64.123]
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_9C6C7FF6-0378-477B-A004-5CF85CC7881E"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/MmgwJUhBt2SJPysa55Sk00enpww>
Cc: "draft-yc-v6ops-solicited-ra-unicast@tools.ietf.org" <draft-yc-v6ops-solicited-ra-unicast@tools.ietf.org>, v6ops list <v6ops@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-yc-v6ops-solicited-ra-unicast
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Jul 2015 05:38:47 -0000

> On Jul 8, 2015, at 10:08 PM, Mark Smith <markzzzsmith@gmail.com>; wrote:
> 
> One thought I have though is that I wonder if just changing solicited
> RAs from multlicast to unicasts would result in an increase in the
> number of multicast RSes?

Sounds like you have a tool that you could use to simulate that and find out?