Re: [v6ops] [GROW] Deaggregation by large organizations

Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljitsch@muada.com> Thu, 16 October 2014 15:48 UTC

Return-Path: <iljitsch@muada.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78CAC1A6FF2; Thu, 16 Oct 2014 08:48:18 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.91
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QkxuAjd4hQsU; Thu, 16 Oct 2014 08:48:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sequoia.muada.com (sequoia.muada.com [IPv6:2001:1af8:3100:a006:1::]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 795F81A6FF1; Thu, 16 Oct 2014 08:47:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from global-hq.muada.nl (global-hq.muada.nl [IPv6:2001:470:1f15:8b5:8c56:a593:2e64:be71] (may be forged)) (authenticated bits=0) by sequoia.muada.com (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id s9GFjUch061718 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Thu, 16 Oct 2014 17:45:31 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from iljitsch@muada.com)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\))
From: Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljitsch@muada.com>
In-Reply-To: <543FA152.4080907@foobar.org>
Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2014 17:47:31 +0200
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <9C220463-4D0E-465B-ADF5-390518F180C7@muada.com>
References: <F5C06CAF-0AD2-4225-8EE7-FC72CE9913F0@muada.com> <755DE4C3-CDDF-41AF-BA9C-E8EC5B4DFC4C@muada.com> <543FA152.4080907@foobar.org>
To: Nick Hilliard <nick@foobar.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6)
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/Mn5RqZC5PpHEryesUQM-aYQPw2U
Cc: v6ops@ietf.org, grow@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [v6ops] [GROW] Deaggregation by large organizations
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2014 15:48:18 -0000

On 16 Oct 2014, at 12:43, Nick Hilliard <nick@foobar.org> wrote:

> This brings up a more general issue:  IPv6 dfz growth for the last several
> years has been linear.

>> https://ripe68.ripe.net/presentations/156-2014-05-12-bgp2013.pdf

Growth in IPv6 more specifics was 57% last year...