Re: [v6ops] Drafts lodged against the deadline.

"Fred Baker (fred)" <> Mon, 07 July 2014 16:47 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost ( []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 877E81A0376 for <>; Mon, 7 Jul 2014 09:47:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -115.152
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-115.152 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.651, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 297MywRBBxJa for <>; Mon, 7 Jul 2014 09:47:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D705F1A036F for <>; Mon, 7 Jul 2014 09:47:42 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple;;; l=3782; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1404751663; x=1405961263; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:references:in-reply-to: mime-version; bh=o+xJaPSGj0GkIs3AhKO+bVEkLocq0siO4nZX65w333k=; b=lv78ueIEY011E2v4dDE3c0rIxA9y3gEz9M5/My+/olrG6nY3MvAv9COn Wf4n2ynOw5eqqp2qJ1cbQJc7VU4APiyGK/p0L2FCECKlXwFeJtC7UG+Mo sFbSxmzaPdh81WmFFwjwcHXgDP4/BWVgTrd9i35CmK7xXAsh00beUD+A2 Y=;
X-Files: signature.asc : 195
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.01,619,1400025600"; d="asc'?scan'208";a="338211502"
Received: from ([]) by with ESMTP; 07 Jul 2014 16:47:43 +0000
Received: from ( []) by (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s67GlgM6031759 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Mon, 7 Jul 2014 16:47:42 GMT
Received: from ([]) by ([]) with mapi id 14.03.0123.003; Mon, 7 Jul 2014 11:47:41 -0500
From: "Fred Baker (fred)" <>
To: joel jaeggli <>, IPv6 Ops WG <>
Thread-Topic: [v6ops] Drafts lodged against the deadline.
Thread-Index: AQHPmgMr0qvvbzS9e0OWWCsa57y5Og==
Date: Mon, 07 Jul 2014 16:47:41 +0000
Message-ID: <>
References: <>
In-Reply-To: <>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
x-originating-ip: []
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_78916554-47EF-420F-A224-CC0E89E408D0"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha1"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [v6ops] Drafts lodged against the deadline.
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Jul 2014 16:47:44 -0000

Thanks, Joel.

At this point, Lee and I have not decided what the agenda will contain. Let me give you my current thoughts; list discussion and Lee’s viewpoint when we talk will be important here.

On Jul 7, 2014, at 9:05 AM, joel jaeggli <> wrote:

> Greetings,
> just a helpful reminder to folks who submitted documents right up
> against the submission deadline. It is incumbent on you the authors to
> draw our attention to those so that they may be discussed properly prior
> to the meeting itself and agenda time can be allocated or not as necessary.
> thanks
> joel

The drafts break out this way:


    Jan 12  draft-ietf-v6ops-enterprise-incremental-ipv6
            Approved-announcement to be sent::Revised I-D Needed
    Jun 11  draft-ietf-v6ops-clatip
            Approved-announcement to be sent::Point Raised - writeup needed

Working Group Document updated since IETF 89:

    Mar  6  draft-ietf-v6ops-design-choices
    Mar 11  draft-ietf-v6ops-mobile-device-profile
    Jun 18  draft-ietf-v6ops-dhcpv6-slaac-problem
    Jul  4  draft-ietf-v6ops-ipv6-roaming-analysis
    Jul  4  draft-ietf-v6ops-ula-usage-recommendations

Individual Submission updated since IETF 89:

    Apr  7  draft-smith-v6ops-mitigate-rtr-dos-mld-slctd-node
    Jul  1  draft-kitamura-ipv6-zoneid-free
    Jul  3  draft-jaeggli-v6ops-pmtud-ecmp-problem
    Jul  3  draft-liu-v6ops-running-multiple-prefixes
    Jul  3  draft-wang-v6ops-flow-label-refelction
    Jul  4  draft-sun-v6ops-xlat-multi
    Jul  4  draft-yourtchenko-chown-rupik-v6ops-dad-3x

Working Group Document NOT updated since IETF 89:

    Feb  4  draft-ietf-v6ops-dc-ipv6

Individual Submission NOT updated since IETF 89:

    Jan 11  draft-osamu-v6ops-ipv4-literal-in-url
    Feb 13  draft-cui-v6ops-lte-lw4over6
    Feb 14  draft-foo-v6ops-6rdmtu
    Feb 14  draft-liu-v6ops-dhcpv6-slaac-guidance

To my way of thinking, draft-ietf-v6ops-design-choices (which was posted just before the working group meeting in London) was discussed then, and draft-ietf-v6ops-mobile-device-profile is still working out the last call comments from last September. So among the working group drafts, the ones on the table this time include draft-ietf-v6ops-dhcpv6-slaac-problem, draft-ietf-v6ops-ipv6-roaming-analysis, and draft-ietf-v6ops-ula-usage-recommendations.

Similarly, to my way of thinking, while draft-smith-v6ops-mitigate-rtr-dos-mld-slctd-node is appealing, v6ops comments raised concerns about the reliability of MLD (and MLD implementations) in the context. That sounds like an issue for 6man, not v6ops. 

draft-kitamura-ipv6-zoneid-free and draft-jaeggli-v6ops-pmtud-ecmp-problem have had supportive discussion on the list, so they seem likely. 

I’m looking for list discussion of draft-liu-v6ops-running-multiple-prefixes, draft-wang-v6ops-flow-label-refelction, draft-sun-v6ops-xlat-multi, and draft-yourtchenko-chown-rupik-v6ops-dad-3x.

Opinions welcome. As always.