Re: [v6ops] Opsdir early review of draft-ietf-v6ops-v4v6-xlat-prefix-00

Fred Baker <fredbaker.ietf@gmail.com> Wed, 03 May 2017 10:23 UTC

Return-Path: <fredbaker.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F18BE12947F; Wed, 3 May 2017 03:23:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id AzKKcCIbTyuc; Wed, 3 May 2017 03:23:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wm0-x244.google.com (mail-wm0-x244.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::244]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8F58F1294A4; Wed, 3 May 2017 03:21:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wm0-x244.google.com with SMTP id y10so11630432wmh.0; Wed, 03 May 2017 03:21:21 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=rZbdHYtfYjfsXJIXrrLvj38ladSzLZBOFy7InbpDnxQ=; b=F7b3kkHpNy7IXCbQ2qQJxthR9SRwdoscj0uCa8GpISDiT3TOMg24F3VOoMQurGvlOb jWK151kxPuWUTDFSYrxXz2NXfmRpCtSwdm1fMYrWRpdJO20409CE40aR64bJMGwy5boF S6Xs+npQj53YBTs3G/KeruUuEZF2VKdTx8R49LJ4+31WuietbVH0A48LLpfzaYiZdikv rFkje0uPs0dNgHKDBHmzB61hiu8KWhqSWGz5s5mF/77+nDm+Vsup4MwANA+k2dTMhZU7 SF2ag8bVd0csuJYlL+6G6Dm51DYe6sLa+hSp/KQEtDBj8I0XBmn2wiMq6zCxp3BTsJvF GNuQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=rZbdHYtfYjfsXJIXrrLvj38ladSzLZBOFy7InbpDnxQ=; b=AOcT0Ur3a8mZu9lZAltTQihE0U38f5otkurFrB0oGM5Naq7QPFAuCr1Mrw22Jg7N+u OZTcvZystOM4p74Wlta+gP1Ox5as9Vv3ABdP2OU11Irs46r8fqpHsDlNRK+14DMr+VhX 9AiNQEpHlU8OV1JTLDKN4B57LBYqQO37S7ar0GvOXsiIUO971l5Ln1i0N9eLEsPlrk+4 E33z5EhTrdZBEps2US9xrtGg4aAv/x+VTdf2MIFpCujthDBKfPiMsqeQzeYtHsVFZcIN yLpYNiS6YT+OQF0j63qsTo7iz8+mZDaiqymAhIaXjbOOEAtQtGWLmhsHWjm9IKFODccm fGmA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AODbwcBI65MxrjiGO01OyY0CU2aCLk1vxLpCgZke0p0ler653gIN18m6 0qNBS89cmlXLZg==
X-Received: by 10.28.193.138 with SMTP id r132mr221724wmf.87.1493806880047; Wed, 03 May 2017 03:21:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 211.66.20.149.in-addr.arpa (211.66.20.149.in-addr.arpa. [149.20.66.211]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id u200sm4395602wmd.16.2017.05.03.03.21.16 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 03 May 2017 03:21:19 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.3 \(3273\))
From: Fred Baker <fredbaker.ietf@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <8392FFDD-AA72-47B6-B689-1EE2C8967A2E@cisco.com>
Date: Wed, 03 May 2017 06:21:14 -0400
Cc: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>, "ops-dir@ietf.org" <ops-dir@ietf.org>, "v6ops@ietf.org" <v6ops@ietf.org>, "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-v6ops-v4v6-xlat-prefix.all@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-v6ops-v4v6-xlat-prefix.all@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <B40D28DD-B8F9-4BA7-A8E1-61AD390829D4@gmail.com>
References: <149373185172.9923.9255526962045750289@ietfa.amsl.com> <06e8313e-38ed-7ea5-76f0-db2f6352844e@gmail.com> <8392FFDD-AA72-47B6-B689-1EE2C8967A2E@cisco.com>
To: Joe Clarke <jclarke@cisco.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3273)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/NmSxMBnZzr-qxMxy1Kau8TQ9XOc>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] Opsdir early review of draft-ietf-v6ops-v4v6-xlat-prefix-00
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 May 2017 10:23:42 -0000

One of the issues with a document that updates another document is that it is supposed to say in the abstract that it does.

> On May 2, 2017, at 7:06 PM, Joe Clarke (jclarke) <jclarke@cisco.com> wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> PGP Key : http://www.marcuscom.com/pgp.asc
> 
>> On May 2, 2017, at 19:01, Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>>> On 03/05/2017 01:30, Joe Clarke wrote:
>>> ...
>>> NITS:
>>> 
>>> In your Abstract, you mention RFC6890, but this does not appear to be
>>> an xref to it, and it should be.
>> 
>> afaik, the RFC Editor style does not allow xrefs in the Abstract.
> 
> I've seen some that do (ostensibly).  But this if this isn't required, it wasn't critical.
> 
> Joe
> 
>> 
>> (Also: draft-bchv-rfc6890bis will update 6890 soon. I don't know whether
>> that's relevant.)
>> 
>>   Brian