IETF Logo Mail Archive

[v6ops] Re: [EXTERNAL] New Version Notification for draft-jens-7050-secure-channel-00.txt

Marco Moock <mm@dorfdsl.de> Thu, 27 June 2024 06:15 UTC

Return-Path: <mm@dorfdsl.de>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B900C151984 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 26 Jun 2024 23:15:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.109
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.109 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=dorfdsl.de
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4W4yXcS8B5Cc for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 26 Jun 2024 23:15:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from srv1.dorfdsl.de (srv1.dorfdsl.de [IPv6:2a01:170:118f:3::22]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9170EC14CE45 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Wed, 26 Jun 2024 23:15:32 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=dorfdsl.de; s=default; t=1719468928; bh=uqbPsVpLaHT0VRDhs9po9cE2PQImW5o4Qd6RM8gY0Dg=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=WeNXTVqo9XQHJROHWv2hjhwrIzDHvEqeBQJxc4KqYchlZEExaeBdTm5zqmDnm+Ua6 VPl9s3SDMeTuS0ma5V0JnJ7OSmZ5K0lasOeeqfg8x4hWWREPjf2XxZn9kKxKOo+al7 hWUMm1gsfXnUqLtzO45mXLMuR965o40N6YSLrqFA+zeqHNIbR+TSL32t/xUEj5sx1I INeHffnwWOcAwl2aNviTzbGu/d+SQaZEl8JzH2pr6RCUR/E1mkKf1qZIPVxRxNzTcF iP7D9N3LAubhHwZNv4sh5yqfThK7NUG2sJWJNbxP0n7HW74Eo4ztVUOuzSPVIJ6Ulz EPZbRTvQQZCdQ==
Received: from localhost ([IPv6:2a01:170:118f:2:9d1f:61f5:9ddf:438d]) (authenticated bits=0) by srv1.dorfdsl.de (8.17.1.9/8.17.1.9/Debian-2) with ESMTPSA id 45R6FR3A064956 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Thu, 27 Jun 2024 08:15:27 +0200
Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2024 08:15:26 +0200
From: Marco Moock <mm@dorfdsl.de>
To: v6ops@ietf.org
Message-ID: <20240627081526.15a625cb@dorfdsl.de>
In-Reply-To: <c261c1ef-12fd-4fc7-b1ed-1d4886eb6b8e@nsrc.org>
References: <171938023258.233563.15620604196859383340@dt-datatracker-5864469bc9-n5hqk> <PH0PR00MB1350CE1FF1162D8C77FEE918FAD62@PH0PR00MB1350.namprd00.prod.outlook.com> <a2756f5f-52d8-4529-bb1a-166bc80f5b96@nsrc.org> <PH0PR00MB13527A4B2814F8748808D3E3FAD62@PH0PR00MB1352.namprd00.prod.outlook.com> <c261c1ef-12fd-4fc7-b1ed-1d4886eb6b8e@nsrc.org>
X-Mailer: Claws Mail 4.3.0 (GTK 3.24.42; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID-Hash: HCAUOFWJUENE7F3EU2X5HA66RW7NJVDW
X-Message-ID-Hash: HCAUOFWJUENE7F3EU2X5HA66RW7NJVDW
X-MailFrom: mm@dorfdsl.de
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-v6ops.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc4
Precedence: list
Subject: [v6ops] Re: [EXTERNAL] New Version Notification for draft-jens-7050-secure-channel-00.txt
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/NqunZuqEYs-l_xnJcsXV6qRx5AQ>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:v6ops-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:v6ops-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:v6ops-leave@ietf.org>

Am 26.06.2024 um 20:47:28 Uhr schrieb Brian Candler:

> I was trying not to cloud the issue in my previous remark, but I
> might as well add additional fuel to the fire now: should DNS64
> itself be deprecated? Once you have 464XLAT then you don't need it at
> all, and you don't need to pretend to applications that IPv4-only
> servers have IPv6 addresses.

DNS64 has one big benefit: It works with all machines and
application that are IPv6 capable and don't try to use an IPv4 address
directly.

464XLAT needs a machine that supports it, which many systems don't do
yet, so I think deprecating DNS64 isn't a good idea yet.

-- 
kind regards
Marco

v2.28.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status