IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] draft-elkins-v6ops-ipv6-pdm-recommended-usage-00

Nalini Elkins <nalini.elkins@insidethestack.com> Mon, 05 August 2013 14:58 UTC

Return-Path: <nalini.elkins@insidethestack.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 188C021F9F7F for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 5 Aug 2013 07:58:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.998
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, J_CHICKENPOX_13=0.6]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VhCo2HWtDdrb for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 5 Aug 2013 07:58:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nm1-vm8.access.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com (nm1-vm8.access.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com [216.109.114.79]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A173F21F9F6F for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Mon, 5 Aug 2013 07:58:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [66.196.81.155] by nm1.access.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 05 Aug 2013 14:58:41 -0000
Received: from [66.196.81.134] by tm1.access.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 05 Aug 2013 14:58:41 -0000
Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1010.access.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 05 Aug 2013 14:58:41 -0000
X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3
X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 13806.48257.bm@omp1010.access.mail.bf1.yahoo.com
Received: (qmail 99027 invoked by uid 60001); 5 Aug 2013 14:58:40 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1375714720; bh=E7/eieltNllLYUIOecyVqN+hS2SQ5Cnj+YkvLf/4lWE=; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Rocket-MIMEInfo:X-Mailer:References:Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=jVijtHCKmXHbx9ofKlONYfKfEMdkzzFHuQM0vQWYXAV37psLV8WcMcOy0iUyECmilSkdNSkz4CX2qM2U+VD8Xzt570LvsKSjFIDrrZuz73aVfddpecGfaaY93OsvgN3X7PihUecLBGirgCFgzt8x8FaHojexZ8wra5Ahspx6oDw=
X-YMail-OSG: DmJa_VkVM1mahvZEaofSwCIlUWRIeWYa6gjVn_6d123TTTH rVWjAQO6nHEzT.TW92rFeX1FgBNTQANw891GKU_l068T3KRJ2o6oM6S_Dqvo LeKkbPuVvX7zSx3S4O59TQXWWqVGGNCDMb0pPCg7n..dq8PAtJMVHKfeJRwM jeYti2fX9hmFo_T6iSZg9FjU03BCbUlDfNsrxtSk5z4Hx3Ypc9t7JE5TuBMY VnyyXIFrKE6yIZVKXk1nXVI0JBoFkZb4pmEs7lJcr00q8wN1t9czajsBkU5Q FY6bCJIZhhK6EMq1lwRbFFR2BIx0ZP_lkub3SevAMC.eLKZUlbMV0QYE6oqi F9ZEnVWeHtdtnmuwC9mhXXNvFc20UO1pvRTF9h3uiPPOTmZNNLI73vYqhgOm 71fL3GIEOwfM9C8zbRyqV6jEq4WXQzFErzHOTRg4q6xIoq_eIv5VfNJw2Xnf h1Bcv685ideVjedtuA15mbC9Lazi5IsSfhuigrjrb.vfH4rXJbHVHHiKC_w3 PtK4W.2wnvqkmXBta8D.T9WV8B9udK_3p2YDsILwvnGq3X99KjypZfkkihH9 QbJ1SL19EsyGeFT.UothlUTXzEbkbOQ0m5t9YUX83wgbYI4ZbiN1CCzSkqEq EG2TZrX9cp1Zs8LoFCIu5OJDvnwueDyrlURWYa6LwqrIvrnGQCE8.x5HEbA- -
Received: from [24.130.37.147] by web2803.biz.mail.ne1.yahoo.com via HTTP; Mon, 05 Aug 2013 07:58:40 PDT
X-Rocket-MIMEInfo: 002.001, CgpUaGFua3MsIEJyaWFuLgoKCk5hbGluaSBFbGtpbnMKSW5zaWRlIFByb2R1Y3RzLCBJbmMuCig4MzEpIDY1OS04MzYwCnd3dy5pbnNpZGV0aGVzdGFjay5jb20KCgoKX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX18KIEZyb206IEJyaWFuIEhhYmVybWFuIDxicmlhbkBpbm5vdmF0aW9uc2xhYi5uZXQ.ClRvOiB2Nm9wc0BpZXRmLm9yZyAKU2VudDogTW9uZGF5LCBBdWd1c3QgNSwgMjAxMyA3OjIxIEFNClN1YmplY3Q6IFJlOiBbdjZvcHNdIGRyYWZ0LWVsa2lucy12Nm9wcy1pcHY2LXBkbS1yZWNvbW0BMAEBAQE-
X-Mailer: YahooMailWebService/0.8.152.567
References: <51FA6667.4010200@bogus.com> <1375366309.93638.YahooMailNeo@web2803.biz.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> <51FFB4F2.4060503@innovationslab.net>
Message-ID: <1375714720.98714.YahooMailNeo@web2803.biz.mail.ne1.yahoo.com>
Date: Mon, 05 Aug 2013 07:58:40 -0700
From: Nalini Elkins <nalini.elkins@insidethestack.com>
To: Brian Haberman <brian@innovationslab.net>, "v6ops@ietf.org" <v6ops@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <51FFB4F2.4060503@innovationslab.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="-1551098171-310996721-1375714720=:98714"
Subject: Re: [v6ops] draft-elkins-v6ops-ipv6-pdm-recommended-usage-00
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Nalini Elkins <nalini.elkins@insidethestack.com>
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Aug 2013 14:58:48 -0000


Thanks, Brian.


Nalini Elkins
Inside Products, Inc.
(831) 659-8360
www.insidethestack.com



________________________________
 From: Brian Haberman <brian@innovationslab.net>
To: v6ops@ietf.org 
Sent: Monday, August 5, 2013 7:21 AM
Subject: Re: [v6ops] draft-elkins-v6ops-ipv6-pdm-recommended-usage-00
 

ntpwg@lists.ntp.org will get you the NTP WG.

Regards,
Brian

On 8/1/13 10:11 AM, Nalini Elkins wrote:
> Thanks for your comments, Joel.
>
> I want to take some time to research this further and talk to some more people.    I will respond back on the list to this point in about 2 weeks.   I want to talk this over with some of the folks actively working on NTP at IETF.
>
> Nalini Elkins
> Inside Products, Inc.
> (831) 659-8360
> www.insidethestack.com
>
>
>
> ________________________________
>   From: joel jaeggli <joelja@bogus.com>
> To: Nalini Elkins <nalini.elkins@insidethestack.com>; IPv6 Ops WG <v6ops@ietf.org>
> Sent: Thursday, August 1, 2013 6:45 AM
> Subject: draft-elkins-v6ops-ipv6-pdm-recommended-usage-00
>
>
> Since I ran into you in the hall and the dicussion turned to ntp...
>
> I'll try and be succinct, and as a non-expert in the time field this
> should be taken with a grain of salt.
>
> The generic utility of a high-resultion time-stamp is imho dodgey
> outside of situations where the clocks are deliberately syncronized and
> traceable to a common standard whether the protocol used for this is ntp
> or ieee 1588 (or since this is the ietf PTPV2) . While this is tractable
> for devices in a single span of control, the agruement that ntp might be
> suffcient to make this timstamp useful generically between two
> aribitratry devices where this functionality may need to be enabled is
> imho a hard one to assert.
>
> It is a set of operational practice and discipline moreso than the
> choice of technology that allows for a high-resolution timestamp to have
> sufficient precision to be useful between hosts.
>
> joel
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> v6ops mailing list
> v6ops@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops
>

_______________________________________________
v6ops mailing list
v6ops@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email