IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] out-of-focus: why DHCPv6 breaks Android computers?

Ole Troan <otroan@employees.org> Tue, 29 October 2019 16:11 UTC

Return-Path: <otroan@employees.org>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7165812006E for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 29 Oct 2019 09:11:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id x6A8qZjO_TTp for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 29 Oct 2019 09:11:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from clarinet.employees.org (clarinet.employees.org [198.137.202.74]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4171D12001A for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Tue, 29 Oct 2019 09:11:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from astfgl.hanazo.no (246.51-175-81.customer.lyse.net [51.175.81.246]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by clarinet.employees.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 44F724E12957; Tue, 29 Oct 2019 16:11:47 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [IPv6:::1] (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by astfgl.hanazo.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05DD52073D09; Tue, 29 Oct 2019 17:11:43 +0100 (CET)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.0 \(3594.4.19\))
From: Ole Troan <otroan@employees.org>
In-Reply-To: <A2784588-0ED4-4CDD-B782-D6FC08C6A6D4@fugue.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2019 17:11:43 +0100
Cc: Barbara H Stark <bs7652@att.com>, "v6ops@ietf.org" <v6ops@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <EB26AC7E-760C-49F4-89A6-2BFE4E1A233E@employees.org>
References: <2b617ab1-018a-8f03-4d8b-081c09c9c88a@gmail.com> <CAFU7BATuer=XutH-G0v0cSCqmcULU2UgHe9GGhS0OhUY2brU4A@mail.gmail.com> <b43f56b8-e5d6-b875-c594-656bc6ba0b45@gmail.com> <8DA54CF0-B7D7-4E4B-BA85-EA024401DEAC@fugue.com> <2D09D61DDFA73D4C884805CC7865E611536B4B1B@GAALPA1MSGUSRBF.ITServices.sbc.com> <A2784588-0ED4-4CDD-B782-D6FC08C6A6D4@fugue.com>
To: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3594.4.19)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/O18k5V-Q-CueKb6NnEI1PgQ8aZA>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] out-of-focus: why DHCPv6 breaks Android computers?
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2019 16:11:49 -0000

Ted,

>> It's a beautiful little bit, and I like it very much. It doesn't deserve to be maligned like this. It has served me very well.
> 
> I just meant that the RFC that described the meaning of the ‘M’ bit explicitly has been deprecated in favor of one that does not.  You’re right about the ‘A’ bit, and I’m sorry for maligning it.  :)

Which RFC is that?
As far as I know the M-flag is defined in RFC4861.

Cheers,
Ole

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email