IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-yc-v6ops-solicited-ra-unicast

Nabil Benamar <benamar73@gmail.com> Wed, 22 July 2015 14:48 UTC

Return-Path: <benamar73@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48D751B2E02 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 22 Jul 2015 07:48:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.748
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.748 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_32=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id K2c3vY1lzcPI for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 22 Jul 2015 07:48:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-la0-x22e.google.com (mail-la0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c03::22e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A409A1B2DFB for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Wed, 22 Jul 2015 07:48:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by lagw2 with SMTP id w2so139462888lag.3 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Wed, 22 Jul 2015 07:48:44 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=sLzku+kvEm/jgpF7GDwIm6BFKiTTPPDT/r7xgU4yDmw=; b=N0W2JW3KvbrJNsU0g4fINVkLRUD925muq6RGiQwJymw4EvggM+FhWeWxNgjMMLuR50 jf1Tbc28IqcqShzXR16FxRhHTLUFqMxLuBi0zmDrlvHmmZqrmQejReABXvnfYrMQnhgd 7JJLFcGf0Z1RVjwmWzUUqvZmzsKpFIlBR6+0h+OG3QKj/BqzheSyoO0oK+N5CoY+tfEC mD/T3CPla3s8a/5pnjgSW+HNzIgEtUVuZpKyYbYgoXB4OsTMQ8igbM5V7+qy7iqy6rj7 4dx+90q7uOPYvJ4DZ9sqeyg4rT6t1KEhQT6tsyz3aFiG4t0z35bCpH6JDCLSgb3jxsHE FKaw==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.152.20.138 with SMTP id n10mr2727489lae.115.1437576523984; Wed, 22 Jul 2015 07:48:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.25.41.146 with HTTP; Wed, 22 Jul 2015 07:48:43 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <20150722142711.GA23678@puck.nether.net>
References: <CAKD1Yr1xnKaYrFG4izZ4MbB1aRh89CGzTkc1ZjjryOgvdN0hQw@mail.gmail.com> <55AF889F.6080206@gmail.com> <CAFU7BAShd1qOhLi5aRhO31_WFHFXZyUdgMEAi4CGZ=t1cL49JA@mail.gmail.com> <CAKD1Yr0+8VtcuXRMBu875gTzUj4BeXX+0T7xWVKFWEiDV7ffJg@mail.gmail.com> <55AF908A.4010906@gmail.com> <CAKD1Yr1K_eYq9MuNWgJGxmr7YE9UrcprwX4iCEOZtCn8KETyRg@mail.gmail.com> <55AF9265.9070608@gmail.com> <CAKD1Yr3yrO+g+LU+gp6J-HxTHstdDcbvWLYJRJ-jz+XN++xeRw@mail.gmail.com> <55AF94E0.5050802@gmail.com> <CAKD1Yr1TmWnypKbzdT+pmv_j1jS5c295QusrrjAKtbUXdoP7Rg@mail.gmail.com> <20150722142711.GA23678@puck.nether.net>
Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2015 15:48:43 +0100
Message-ID: <CAMugd_XSuV3hvYbtN6+nkqFVq7a6WsbQZa50r3bAHiqRs0OHEA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Nabil Benamar <benamar73@gmail.com>
To: Jared Mauch <jared@puck.nether.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="089e0149414c0cb6f3051b77de05"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/ODzRG0ylZPgnN2cS5Nn110dCLv0>
Cc: "v6ops@ietf.org WG" <v6ops@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-yc-v6ops-solicited-ra-unicast
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2015 14:48:47 -0000

another title alternative could be: "Towards an eco-friendly Router
Advertisements"

Best regards



On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 3:27 PM, Jared Mauch <jared@puck.nether.net> wrote:

> On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 03:15:33PM +0200, Lorenzo Colitti wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 3:04 PM, Alexandru Petrescu <
> > alexandru.petrescu@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Ok, we can change "battery-powered" to "exclusively battery-powered" in
> > >> the next revision of the draft.
> > >>
> > >
> > > No, I didnt mean that.
> > >
> > > Maybe "exclusively li-ion 7.2V 700maH batteries".
> > >
> >
> > "Devices where network communication has non-negligible affect on battery
> > life"
>
>         While this is clearly obvious on devices that require sipping
> power that they are not working right, it may exist in other devices
> or poorly implemented hardware on wired devices which are asleep.  Dave
> Thaler talked yesterday about the logo requirements for MSFT in the
> hardware
> to do ARP and NDP offload.
>
>         I suspect instead of arguging about the nits here some generic
> text would be most constructive.  Call it "Green" to use lower power
> by having unicast vs multicast/broadcast traffic.
>
>         - Jared
>
> --
> Jared Mauch  | pgp key available via finger from jared@puck.nether.net
> clue++;      | http://puck.nether.net/~jared/  My statements are only
> mine.
>
> _______________________________________________
> v6ops mailing list
> v6ops@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email