Re: [v6ops] Discussion focus: draft-ietf-v6ops-ipv6rtr-reqs

Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com> Tue, 09 January 2018 12:56 UTC

Return-Path: <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADA0112D838 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 Jan 2018 04:56:56 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.633
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.633 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.001, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.665] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id aO4mo1RB3iqy for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 Jan 2018 04:56:55 -0800 (PST)
Received: from sainfoin-smtp-out.extra.cea.fr (sainfoin-smtp-out.extra.cea.fr [132.167.192.228]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0FF2212D834 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Tue, 9 Jan 2018 04:56:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: from pisaure.intra.cea.fr (pisaure.intra.cea.fr [132.166.88.21]) by sainfoin-sys.extra.cea.fr (8.14.7/8.14.7/CEAnet-Internet-out-4.0) with ESMTP id w09Curh5008693; Tue, 9 Jan 2018 13:56:53 +0100
Received: from pisaure.intra.cea.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id 45A12204FAC; Tue, 9 Jan 2018 13:56:53 +0100 (CET)
Received: from muguet1.intra.cea.fr (muguet1.intra.cea.fr [132.166.192.6]) by pisaure.intra.cea.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2EE04202244; Tue, 9 Jan 2018 13:56:53 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [10.8.34.184] (is227335.intra.cea.fr [10.8.34.184]) by muguet1.intra.cea.fr (8.15.2/8.15.2/CEAnet-Intranet-out-1.4) with ESMTP id w09CuqBf002291; Tue, 9 Jan 2018 13:56:53 +0100
To: Gert Doering <gert@space.net>
Cc: v6ops@ietf.org
References: <CAKD1Yr2GjXKM53rJJwRzX7RyrCG8u+KZ0TTGuFv=NefHsKRxrw@mail.gmail.com> <11d764f6-e0d7-c24e-7b51-c8b5bb026082@gmail.com> <20180109120700.GW45648@Space.Net> <592ac6fa-9d1f-e802-3c29-8d70dedf60b3@gmail.com> <20180109121654.GY45648@Space.Net> <7d0aa9fb-ac74-52dc-0437-01c173f2b38e@gmail.com> <20180109122844.GZ45648@Space.Net> <4cca5ac8-e80a-6297-205e-464f490facb0@gmail.com> <20180109124308.GA45648@Space.Net> <adb1923e-5e62-127d-2319-c0f641f1fc92@gmail.com> <20180109125337.GB45648@Space.Net>
From: Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <8853d89b-0c18-d8ed-511e-5417491030b0@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2018 13:56:52 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.5.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20180109125337.GB45648@Space.Net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Language: fr
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/Oe56QElVnNYXm9H2p1JPIaSmw5o>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] Discussion focus: draft-ietf-v6ops-ipv6rtr-reqs
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Jan 2018 12:56:56 -0000


Le 09/01/2018 à 13:53, Gert Doering a écrit :
> Hi,
> 
> On Tue, Jan 09, 2018 at 01:52:25PM +0100, Alexandre Petrescu wrote:
>> It seems there is some good idea about what "best way" is.
> 
> "Something that works in more than 5% of all networks world wide" would
> be a reasonable start for "best".

DHCPv6 Prefix Delegation applies well there.

Nonetheless, I suggst to think of a more engineering approach to 
designing a "best way" rather than an economics approach.

Something like: it MUST work in accordance with fundamental principles 
of Internet.

Alex

> 
> Gert Doering
>          -- NetMaster
>