Re: [v6ops] IETF 110 agenda development

Haisheng Yu <> Sat, 30 January 2021 04:06 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25E863A0A1C for <>; Fri, 29 Jan 2021 20:06:37 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.087
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.087 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_REMOTE_IMAGE=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id d2y7MUUI8Qvi for <>; Fri, 29 Jan 2021 20:06:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ( [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::144]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 097C03A0A12 for <>; Fri, 29 Jan 2021 20:06:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: by with SMTP id i187so15326459lfd.4 for <>; Fri, 29 Jan 2021 20:06:34 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=google; h=mime-version:reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=zaCv7owCqEOCIDtoLeVGUBIjJ8i1uo/qMOSeQrd7Cww=; b=e8049fx337A0KPKBSWQHshZNOKMz66RvDP65w+7NS6iRC0ctEzsWUsBJiwvHSxn/GS wWhJz9AlbJVjne7f/IOJd7LtLFgJYupaNO8wAGXjp1GmAxCdzZfjLlkxoU+fC78vD9EU jLzBKrKlikJ3peEy2kDqdbFnaVjPHr4H2hPkdTRZlXQKwuq6Me0NaXbW4aXvFVxgtc5N /MFkeRZvuIG0jVWlloSVAcTXAxYcotGoB10MJuuCqaz0wo3vxNzpx6/TOw1O/VqwKmh6 Vzx31zxwIX1bcRk3el177cdWhZdjdxJN6wDnOsxPzKLObaLWfnHYNAop9p4IGeNZCFEV D32A==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:reply-to:from:date:message-id :subject:to; bh=zaCv7owCqEOCIDtoLeVGUBIjJ8i1uo/qMOSeQrd7Cww=; b=B+15vmLoH7FfQhwZOzNybTdZ9Ct+VM7YPEfGFPoiCxVRrlfP1ZnOs/UXeWfbvlAUUq YXzwZTpzhQsqE2/3Gs/xy7ONoHfWNrTZFdTBAS2CvJtAVokSjfkKL2Mffkje3v3vqMs8 kw++ux3cMrJAez0yktZgMP75Z1DeaR0jYrF9gkxylQ4YGOr0wzsqB2ArAb5UXZHs9xS7 kInITYatUnIr8Ya+wUJM+4DiyuRh75p5O6f+pidIkGYRiVIs25Eer8pApHr8UneJrMLS HNhz7jYwkYALewv+eM2JrrTHwzBU8pjhqJVQGv+2K6BfW6bK7/yUG+NA7XoEdFrVpK+h CTSA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533UhXQ8ltqTwHFFO2enGuDttznQLGbCISNZ48tuAExYqpcipTnL 0BRNXcL0AbLYfyeauuNTbcmADk0oKjDP0hUIdlMwrW0ywUzJ/JU4GuE9+SV/
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJy+9MQxw1Auf+PYz6BBTSIr9FYZcCvapI3txxwEEFsAytWwZtnMe8DsPywwsaAYM8Ss/In2/avSOOfDdOtdOTg=
X-Received: by 2002:ac2:5612:: with SMTP id v18mr3567535lfd.515.1611979592564; Fri, 29 Jan 2021 20:06:32 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Haisheng Yu <>
Date: Sat, 30 Jan 2021 12:06:20 +0800
Message-ID: <>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000001c5905ba163fc1"
Archived-At: <>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] IETF 110 agenda development
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 30 Jan 2021 04:12:53 -0000

Hi folks,

Thanks to the authors for this very well-written draft, which clearly
analyzed and stated the issues faced by the HBH options header. The logic
is very clear, and the derived requirements are also reasonable. This work
is very valuable and has the potential to be taken as a guidance especially
when the IPv6 is being widely deployed as well as the new services enabled
by IPv6. I hope the WG can consider to progress this work further and I
support it.

By the way, some of the IPv6-based innovations I am currently working on
also need the support of HBH.

Best Regards.

Haisheng Yu

On 1/22/2021 14:23,Pengshuping (Peng Shuping)<>
<> wrote:

Hi Fred, all,

Just to add a bit more information here.

Thanks to all the feedback we received after the presentation in IETF109,
we have updated the draft with the help of all the coauthors and
contributors. Please find the diff,

It will be great if we continue to receiving your feedback and comments to
improve this work further.

Best regards,


*From:* v6ops [] *On Behalf Of *Gyan Mishra
*Sent:* Friday, January 22, 2021 1:05 PM
*To:* Fred Baker <>
*Cc:* IPv6 Operations <>
*Subject:* Re: [v6ops] IETF 110 agenda development

Hi Fred

I would like to request a 10-15 minute time slot for

HBH draft below:

Thank you


On Sat, Jan 9, 2021 at 1:16 PM Fred Baker <> wrote:

You can find the important dates for IETF 110 at It will be held
virtually, as the last several have. It was intended to be held in Prague
(and I was looking forward to Prague), and so will be timed as if it were
in that timezone.

I mention the dates page, as that page indicates that the draft cut-off is
2021-02-22. If you want to get a document in to discuss in March, it needs
to be in by then, and enough earlier to allow some discussion on the list
prior to Ron and I having to concoct and agenda.
v6ops mailing list


[image: 图像已被发件人删除。] <>

*Gyan Mishra*

*Network Solutions Architect *

*M 301 502-134713101 Columbia Pike *Silver Spring, MD