Subject: Re: [v6ops] The need for local-ipv4 socket transition solutions -- NAT64/DNS64 remains insufficient
From: Lorenzo Colitti <[email-masked]>
To: Ca By <[email-masked]>
Cc: IPv6 Ops WG <[email-masked]>, Tore Anderson <[email-masked]>, Kossut Tomasz - Hurt <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2015 07:54:32 -0500
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>

On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 11:12 AM, Ca By <[email-masked]> wrote:

> But there is one major mobile OS missing this feature.
>
> Perhaps the IETF should give guidance via BCP that an IPv6-only solution
> that supports IPv4 sockets be supported on hosts
>

Oh, I see why you started this thread now. Do you expect that the IETF
would be able to reach consensus on such a statement?