Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-mobile-device-profile last call

Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com> Fri, 30 January 2015 15:32 UTC

Return-Path: <lorenzo@google.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F11C11A90BA for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 30 Jan 2015 07:32:33 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.388
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.388 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id awBrVSLalkgG for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 30 Jan 2015 07:32:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ig0-x22f.google.com (mail-ig0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c05::22f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E43551A90C4 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Fri, 30 Jan 2015 07:32:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ig0-f175.google.com with SMTP id hn18so3963029igb.2 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Fri, 30 Jan 2015 07:32:26 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=P1bc9Ru1sFymcgf333A8ocQ8iZmoWRrqjgO4/yjqCvk=; b=lSUwl3KHKfIySLWF0Pt6JULJzTkiB5Rhh/O8BBmeYZEb5m/kdeVtZjUfs1qwkMa8+r rI6mu6/P+JPLLuX19Y38QzkyFWSja3vuRgiXoC1FvqGtJWwX1VQn6hU6QDjltoyIZHLI TjGkP5ZjHS6/srJ6n+GsQomvG4XAgF0MxfCSh9Wr3uk3oaLhyUnt/Kn+RT/0FVeZQ6k/ QLvd03fzzOH8MlQFe9G4bS8lY5V+/QfRa7DdgOmVn3GPfbWgQoTKx3Y4jNZ96LWlr/Jv PC10pYDvlIngj5tiPVP8tCCeec3Rbc569dkHgg2vdz6K/7M1ie9JZPjS5JSe3GYQV24m EUmQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=P1bc9Ru1sFymcgf333A8ocQ8iZmoWRrqjgO4/yjqCvk=; b=hLN0kjV9scmmlRbwg9LIf+5RqBPewq1S/FR1m7aWlQDZPSKl1dlgK5k2XhBggoKRBA wr9po/7faThsfOad+/9UfA/p1yXy2kQBAISJ6tIwCg2Ji8OjrfLJtmoV66v3F431Or5H ME9Fv6Jqzv7Q1YxSHBrWNDYo9kp9cSabO88T2AVK1xDhOJJ61Boe0YKitBISorj6V0wk Tf4leojJDz5l6gtbXL+kjbqAx/Ag0Cv0puGqmnggoAoJJ69guFWWuwjmgmnxU44t54c8 uEI93NLyWDTeQiG7qU0h2j2qJyrwPySWV1X8HQBAmGy3+ATkBzhE0PI6ZPlI2NQcDSZG 3c6g==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnkIGWEKktyPkKyhdSYY3Qb22WrktgJoYGSHealt3rITBnMxOlpLVb9+uMpY4PgB4qnaIeh
X-Received: by 10.50.142.106 with SMTP id rv10mr3452283igb.18.1422631946147; Fri, 30 Jan 2015 07:32:26 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.64.138.136 with HTTP; Fri, 30 Jan 2015 07:32:05 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <787AE7BB302AE849A7480A190F8B933004902889@OPEXCLILM23.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup>
References: <8B808F0C-1AA8-4ABE-A06E-80652B9C1498@cisco.com> <B7D61F30-BAC4-4BE0-A5FD-1D4BD4652E55@employees.org> <20150129201251.GD34798@Space.Net> <787AE7BB302AE849A7480A190F8B933004902668@OPEXCLILM23.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup> <20150130103924.GG34798@Space.Net> <787AE7BB302AE849A7480A190F8B933004902889@OPEXCLILM23.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup>
From: Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com>
Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2015 00:32:05 +0900
Message-ID: <CAKD1Yr2WQfbDstchk4J0hcCz2_X23nijd71QytU5RpuV=Q3Wjg@mail.gmail.com>
To: "<mohamed.boucadair@orange.com>" <mohamed.boucadair@orange.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c3d13acc0394050de04f5a
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/Oj3rw4RctveBnepVIsrl5mGuN2M>
Cc: "draft-ietf-v6ops-mobile-device-profile.all@tools.ietf.org" <draft-ietf-v6ops-mobile-device-profile.all@tools.ietf.org>, V6 Ops List <v6ops@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] draft-ietf-v6ops-mobile-device-profile last call
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2015 15:32:34 -0000

On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 9:21 PM, <mohamed.boucadair@orange.com> wrote:

> With all due respect, I'm afraid we are not discussing whether the
> document is needed or not but (as I see it) whether the new version does
> not break the WG consensus that was declared for the version sent to the
> IESG.


Er, wait. Are you're saying that if the WG re-reads this document and there
is no longer consensus in the WG that it should be published, it gets
published anyway?