IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-cui-v6ops-lte-lw4over6

Cb B <cb.list6@gmail.com> Thu, 13 February 2014 13:53 UTC

Return-Path: <cb.list6@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 257C41A024D for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 13 Feb 2014 05:53:59 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.75
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.75 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bm3005ou17yp for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 13 Feb 2014 05:53:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-wi0-x230.google.com (mail-wi0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c05::230]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E67AA1A0276 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Thu, 13 Feb 2014 05:53:55 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-wi0-f176.google.com with SMTP id hi5so8620662wib.9 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Thu, 13 Feb 2014 05:53:54 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=rmZBE8RTWKfq6b9y0xs5rE08Ln4g/3CKmX5MHqrEyRI=; b=J8ETxhwrbi6W3Bezh/ypsn/V5MLMsLlij/5I4kHVt/9LuhpJPYNAxduAwzx69lFfqa +LyszsZ3ImvuKJkfcMaMnqUebousFg9lin5okbF4gRZM1RFiu2p+ICYgIz71+yGlZJsG NsOr1q8mdCNSWU4XSbg8DIXUEVPgGi2VbeIKnqYlGeQlgoG0fClaQLJwFzfZdkdt6F86 KYVtm7dhZbq2zB0SHhKha8Ba81xomKAhFrjwMrQyTMOV5//sF4TTrWF9HwN3OMBx2A/q MbO/CiiVx3ca1Ojc6x3mXJ21WE47tjDYDY+u31lQt17sfSYZ/jNBns93yaR6BcCAY+sB r3AQ==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.194.22.68 with SMTP id b4mr1511172wjf.6.1392299634210; Thu, 13 Feb 2014 05:53:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.194.133.169 with HTTP; Thu, 13 Feb 2014 05:53:54 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <201402131345.s1DDj0911080@ftpeng-update.cisco.com>
References: <201402131345.s1DDj0911080@ftpeng-update.cisco.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2014 05:53:54 -0800
Message-ID: <CAD6AjGQEPUdw7PHmzaD0zO+_XTzXz4HkaWAC57qb_3Jv+L47fw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Cb B <cb.list6@gmail.com>
To: Fred Baker <fred@cisco.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Cc: IPv6 Ops WG <v6ops@ietf.org>, draft-cui-v6ops-lte-lw4over6@tools.ietf.org
Subject: Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-cui-v6ops-lte-lw4over6
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2014 13:53:59 -0000

On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 5:45 AM,  <fred@cisco.com> wrote:
>
> A new draft has been posted, at http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-cui-v6ops-lte-lw4over6. Please take a look at it and comment.
>


This draft is suggesting modification to the 3GPP defined nodes such
as the eNodeB and PGW.  It would be better if these modifications to
3GPP defined nodes were examined in the 3GPP, not the IETF.

CB


> _______________________________________________
> v6ops mailing list
> v6ops@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email