IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] No IPv4 on the wire

Nick Buraglio <buraglio@es.net> Mon, 23 May 2022 20:35 UTC

Return-Path: <buraglio@es.net>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3866CC15AE14 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 23 May 2022 13:35:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.095
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.095 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=es.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BW7nzCc_dyVy for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 23 May 2022 13:35:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lf1-x130.google.com (mail-lf1-x130.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::130]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 96794C15AE38 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Mon, 23 May 2022 13:35:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lf1-x130.google.com with SMTP id u23so27564345lfc.1 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Mon, 23 May 2022 13:35:19 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=es.net; s=esnet-google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:reply-to:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc; bh=6AtJNxrVlZW+gsl04SDbSLqXDTtUWhzbKdQlMDrhFJM=; b=bHzGjLobzEpZCvX06vPvjGtmI1QYFykhgeEBdlyGZyZsLWkuMJVtLS09CpgZoi5/YG Gx3oanADqfuz/2FCScEI6XS2PMOrevZmJkCLWFzK0R3C7lOMM1ez9ETdKjOzW0Hu5Ghp Ls2zUUdAsb2sYhDaPaKk7UlrDQqZ7ahXlzKs1dQHRM+FzkoPPTbdgWrLnyUdh/rDudpY VqZpA1qVpGNGujUvgFSRI9pruKO8HNKENHFssjyORuJsagF8qU163odslYO3yyGtohZV VOWtnBGe8ZKPAdMCuQW+mnp2YUBnZXJbQqQFEgynkNrzc7IJNTveuxaQJG412Dylxf66 04Gw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:reply-to :from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=6AtJNxrVlZW+gsl04SDbSLqXDTtUWhzbKdQlMDrhFJM=; b=m3+mA0cWHjrAKtDP3UGMRqDDVlMqZesFwENLByCNc0fGO1Rttrvt5FWjx0gSGBWUQ8 M2oO7cWO+umtWiRx0yDMheyadm15jHaSGC1VnH/PZK5pJe+pfpCvFnJhgX0CtAM1sExt mfAdGIfje4CyTmS/AwPbMFxIWYHunE1IYD9wUUV0aey/rX6QaMVp8GkUyoF/HkZqABMH GnvXJO1mC2zVDR4dwSguma3Y815+yF30B4O7nCHTjri5zYRRL1Xue2EwaTAiCbdIeMPt gM6oYWnMUD4nV0JtkJzTgdnwtFqWiLGurpj3HE9qLuCJtvjfm+0cgCW12QnviDc/Eboe /d4w==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532ckYrVTtDCBtqiq5YssUNdJ28LOaIkBT8wtCer0RCmZP/Rx9Jx OixUfVdk/x2lrB9buWcsR26N8M+d5s58l06SM+NGk0uv2Wg7oO7hbQIe2IHc3hK28TvjcFykauw sRHFaCWHWpqJ2vbpOU1Y2WMjOA2oxdKSwkWChRL6WlL60agBEQkcdbOHx0853kjVOVETKMeKF+Q I=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJztY2YCmT+laeeRPmWkZJk9AK4YqXTQlHEaquod5tR6R4bNGtkcpEi9lS5NjzQR5XfnZKohvDAi/5ALgH6wRSM=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6512:114a:b0:473:d6a9:625a with SMTP id m10-20020a056512114a00b00473d6a9625amr17116099lfg.338.1653338116950; Mon, 23 May 2022 13:35:16 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <1c876920-a162-eb8b-9322-bb40a0968276@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <1c876920-a162-eb8b-9322-bb40a0968276@gmail.com>
Reply-To: buraglio@es.net
From: Nick Buraglio <buraglio@es.net>
Date: Mon, 23 May 2022 16:35:05 -0400
Message-ID: <CAM5+tA_W3W_eDUO2F2fdMCwyyarSG7szJoqqEQqC6JLjaMETgQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Soni \"They/Them\" L." <fakedme+ipv6@gmail.com>
Cc: v6ops@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000028114205dfb3c7ea"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/Os399aaFHtty4JxuS8TyTl3gEMU>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] No IPv4 on the wire
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 May 2022 20:35:23 -0000

A few of us had done this with openflow a few years ago - basically only
allowing the ethertypes we wanted in the faucet controller. It stands to
reason that certain devices still support this but I’m guessing it’s fairly
impractical at this point due to limited support for properly working
openflow.

nb

On Mon, May 23, 2022 at 16:03 Soni "They/Them" L. <fakedme+ipv6@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Is there any practical way of getting rid of IPv4 on the wire?
> Specifically, by strictly terminating IPv4 at the computer/device?
> 464XLAT doesn't seem to work on wifi, using stock mobile devices, which
> makes it somewhat difficult/impossible to deploy...
>
> _______________________________________________
> v6ops mailing list
> v6ops@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops
>
-- 
---
Nick Buraglio
Planning and Architecture
Energy Sciences Network
+1 (510) 995-6068

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email