IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] [GROW] Deaggregation data

Nick Hilliard <nick@foobar.org> Tue, 21 October 2014 00:15 UTC

Return-Path: <nick@foobar.org>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B51B01ACF96; Mon, 20 Oct 2014 17:15:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id D5iXCSwXDYVS; Mon, 20 Oct 2014 17:15:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.netability.ie (mail.netability.ie [IPv6:2a03:8900:0:100::5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9FFDA1ACF8B; Mon, 20 Oct 2014 17:15:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Envelope-To: v6ops@ietf.org
Received: from cupcake.foobar.org ([IPv6:2001:4d68:2002:100::1d9]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail.netability.ie (8.14.9/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s9L0Evli022647 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 21 Oct 2014 01:14:58 +0100 (IST) (envelope-from nick@foobar.org)
X-Authentication-Warning: cheesecake.netability.ie: Host [IPv6:2001:4d68:2002:100::1d9] claimed to be cupcake.foobar.org
Message-ID: <5445A581.5020903@foobar.org>
Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2014 01:14:57 +0100
From: Nick Hilliard <nick@foobar.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.10; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.2.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
References: <F5C06CAF-0AD2-4225-8EE7-FC72CE9913F0@muada.com> <755DE4C3-CDDF-41AF-BA9C-E8EC5B4DFC4C@muada.com> <543FA152.4080907@foobar.org> <9C220463-4D0E-465B-ADF5-390518F180C7@muada.com> <54403599.6040205@foobar.org> <m27fzypr93.wl%randy@psg.com> <54417FF4.3000907@foobar.org> <CAL9jLaZXdU0gn2C7o_uf8KNGPCr5_A8K6wnr5fnjmNE6U0dBUQ@mail.gmail.com> <544587C3.10204@foobar.org> <m2ppdm749k.wl%randy@psg.com>
In-Reply-To: <m2ppdm749k.wl%randy@psg.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/PImNwQJ3aQ_VoSe6FXKNZFPq4Do
Cc: V6 Ops List <v6ops@ietf.org>, GROW List <grow@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] [GROW] Deaggregation data
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2014 00:15:11 -0000

On 20/10/2014 23:41, Randy Bush wrote:
> there seems to be a lot of deagg because of the perception that it
> reduces the threat of mis-origination of one's routes.  asia/pac is the
> poster child for this but the competition is keen, see geoff's reports.

this could be highly entertaining in the ipv6 world.

Nick

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email