Re: [v6ops] out-of-focus: why DHCPv6 breaks Android computers?

Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com> Tue, 29 October 2019 18:12 UTC

Return-Path: <mellon@fugue.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3711C120826 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 29 Oct 2019 11:12:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.898
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LCueIfNX-yav for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 29 Oct 2019 11:12:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qk1-x72b.google.com (mail-qk1-x72b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::72b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E413E120B3E for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Tue, 29 Oct 2019 11:11:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qk1-x72b.google.com with SMTP id a194so13180996qkg.10 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Tue, 29 Oct 2019 11:11:42 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date:in-reply-to:cc:to :references; bh=2t9pTo9/aX9+9nloDrkx287l4y2tXLynBxwCQhNAqN4=; b=fdcwbm1wX0U2RugA/f/gpRrHnwK6qZIdXqlU/Fy57YhH54x7qI8+/8h6YIZMNXChOi 6v2qlfhjp44laKFDvdavcMmThXEV/D/U7uNeNzMDolnirqnqMAKicPanruaJLLSLLR4Y jSAB2FrVPdM/+664v7w4956RZ8lDDrgEl6yU9QFwbA7J13Up64r8zlTFWroq5HXwdY/j zV7IMKq62cRKJUCjrJsyFF3j634jhthaR6u17MzyNeoFkX1fE3csdLDGM5IAB1pyb+zC usL3aF3MrNu5Y4bTHkTWuqlCHSkQdhpbT3HrBa86jw86qDY4QMOj0RSjkcu/V9ENoOf1 /gVg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date :in-reply-to:cc:to:references; bh=2t9pTo9/aX9+9nloDrkx287l4y2tXLynBxwCQhNAqN4=; b=V/Yi9SrgGOqrz7Smu1che/naMXVtA7pxY3rffguoUDCVAsxVTHU1LFdzAX9hJizdwS je0WyG3pXTESXUpW4dltFdev4YviCaj0QpAA57m+jv6s7D/ypO8TPMXWptJAoveS3aYH MZypA7/+1aKZrxrYaH5h+9Wd8xE2xB3eLmiFXGrr9Y2syX+N/asA99h//e5xfLy5bZGH gOIID7GMa89jPoFhplr/FjvA1BhYZaXdyu+XdV5URY8u1sEfuU4giPu36QBCDyk9xKPW DZRJy7vkyMwwp/lt/4SGsrzS9mFHHf7ckqdg3PIEx3CSuhjCm+VnO4YgBzxFxKDsc6Bi OCNg==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWEcapeVHJA9xtiJc22R/E0JTExGRajAIYTk89kQZghIjMVc7b6 BkG7laqdn2db0f3dcJmSFJQYEg==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyz6HANXymEZXJJSWIuZ45E6DJoWu7Q4cOdTjQBwau3mmeVGoV2RbYZlD+Wf4px7O+lRE7/6Q==
X-Received: by 2002:a37:4c42:: with SMTP id z63mr20706278qka.79.1572372701934; Tue, 29 Oct 2019 11:11:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?IPv6:2601:18b:300:36ee:90a7:9279:88c4:73a? ([2601:18b:300:36ee:90a7:9279:88c4:73a]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id b185sm9757374qkg.45.2019.10.29.11.11.41 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 29 Oct 2019 11:11:41 -0700 (PDT)
From: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
Message-Id: <654D9D17-FF64-44C8-8DBB-9622A192B08F@fugue.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_E3C954BF-7590-4EAD-941E-AB8630DC6834"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.0 \(3601.0.10\))
Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2019 14:11:39 -0400
In-Reply-To: <EB26AC7E-760C-49F4-89A6-2BFE4E1A233E@employees.org>
Cc: Barbara H Stark <bs7652@att.com>, "v6ops@ietf.org" <v6ops@ietf.org>
To: Ole Troan <otroan@employees.org>
References: <2b617ab1-018a-8f03-4d8b-081c09c9c88a@gmail.com> <CAFU7BATuer=XutH-G0v0cSCqmcULU2UgHe9GGhS0OhUY2brU4A@mail.gmail.com> <b43f56b8-e5d6-b875-c594-656bc6ba0b45@gmail.com> <8DA54CF0-B7D7-4E4B-BA85-EA024401DEAC@fugue.com> <2D09D61DDFA73D4C884805CC7865E611536B4B1B@GAALPA1MSGUSRBF.ITServices.sbc.com> <A2784588-0ED4-4CDD-B782-D6FC08C6A6D4@fugue.com> <EB26AC7E-760C-49F4-89A6-2BFE4E1A233E@employees.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3601.0.10)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/PRqKlj7L2WPlHZSk4DE0M_cmX64>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] out-of-focus: why DHCPv6 breaks Android computers?
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2019 18:12:08 -0000

On Oct 29, 2019, at 12:11 PM, Ole Troan <otroan@employees.org>; wrote:
> Which RFC is that?
> As far as I know the M-flag is defined in RFC4861.

Weird.   You are right.   I don’t know why I’m remembering it this way—I know that there was an issue, but I’m not seeing the problem I remember in the RFC.   The previous version doesn’t mention DHCP specifically, so maybe I’m remembering that version.