IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] Incremental Deployment of IPv6-only Wi-Fi for IETF Meetings

Fred Baker <fredbaker.ietf@gmail.com> Mon, 17 July 2017 08:22 UTC

Return-Path: <fredbaker.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 961D51317A1 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 17 Jul 2017 01:22:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vGfY5fSgCIjs for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 17 Jul 2017 01:22:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wm0-x243.google.com (mail-wm0-x243.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::243]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2D513131798 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Mon, 17 Jul 2017 01:22:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wm0-x243.google.com with SMTP id p204so21643460wmg.1 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Mon, 17 Jul 2017 01:22:20 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=9C8TRmtVRXGchV/N40TWmFWyiDBePkOFqG43HMMjIzU=; b=dtkwRjqHP1sGK+XzJS5UEp7jGb4h34Xx7sPn5mgLnVMKFfh9O/D2Vbpc4/LJmnRi8h PtyG4IzUM5F3iBpfkKBGz6Tnw7lRIjtIOsugZl42KSZ2D9VLHw3i4FwQYYEP+egLs/wC 3NYhy6iNPlxkz/DpDPAyJrFXVV3c02Qz4RwMo+YMN+YmASRSB7nTc4ZW89HDpomdY3Cd byWGtlBvMADDqda4SgqvF2HO5lOcSgDX3gQKCZYAVedczKCr7XSPPy+6IXnz7v9Fntyn QQw2LMb65o/g8S0FtabhAkYEhobjW/TLB0ut/WJwxSEaBxhphLXd7TjRzTdcIwZiLmDq G/IA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=9C8TRmtVRXGchV/N40TWmFWyiDBePkOFqG43HMMjIzU=; b=JHmmUcGKLY9RwKVE2fauNxbYZ1KV//mmn5m9CO2I7F+ifi+/85WW9brfFmJ0GTcnHz cPn6QsZUunR6SfHf3NL7c41QbrQ3rYWX4U3FXuQTvSKKQo+Zg+5PQMS5ZptxCSNO0wqx Du9po5Jq07IoTAOgE4GykhTxifTahJUvHg0HUjsU/MxnfmDJFf2gI9Oi9ZlC6dJjj+SG IqQPeaqe4ekwksJGiIUkijFCi8Nc6xnR1m4Vy+jvw+Bhgz3FISCy1wbnnoInGYTcGvRQ PUk22vuSe/2f3pfFNCrmy4u9uL/lQ5v8YQJF9CckkfizoYAf/TCLHlxwUhYuHQK43hIh yBBQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AIVw111sJysBft4Cjn4/KmGDhrKcCbb4cIOcYaYcYzHUn5XwG0QCkxlD pmlVw+fLAeUatumJvGM=
X-Received: by 10.28.140.143 with SMTP id o137mr3833750wmd.47.1500279738791; Mon, 17 Jul 2017 01:22:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?IPv6:2001:67c:1232:144:e1ca:e28:5032:6def? ([2001:67c:1232:144:e1ca:e28:5032:6def]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 24sm17433664wrw.0.2017.07.17.01.22.17 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 17 Jul 2017 01:22:18 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.0 \(3439\))
From: Fred Baker <fredbaker.ietf@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <42188852-BBEB-4D75-967F-4BED79BBBCAE@consulintel.es>
Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2017 10:22:13 +0200
Cc: IPv6 Ops WG <v6ops@ietf.org>, Jim Martin <jim@daedelus.com>, Russ Housley <housley@vigilsec.com>, Suresh Krishnan <suresh.krishnan@gmail.com>, Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in>, Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <2967DA6E-D74C-4356-8193-74A6D1EA771E@gmail.com>
References: <7643C1DC-76A3-4652-9BB1-D0D42801F37E@consulintel.es> <CAEqgTWYOe=jWp=zVZNLx6DjKjNpPTYaq2jmjryudrGZHKZNq6g@mail.gmail.com> <A5D0385C-F755-4B44-86D8-6E618E77193F@consulintel.es> <CAPt1N1kroh2cPkTr8HRfNjLTdG0hkC1oQsUZdhQzQA5tA9-xug@mail.gmail.com> <9AF791E9-1E12-425E-93A4-2913E2D18CBA@consulintel.es> <CAPt1N1kU4cpVCsp7W3XNAZupYqjTWVH+BNp9bwtznnWD_uP2oQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAEqgTWZzZW0wKggDXjY=-aMfDxzd5-GoRqju1829XwY3aHQuYg@mail.gmail.com> <0FAF1E05-DA4B-47BF-95F7-7EFCD1BED9B0@cable.comcast.com> <42188852-BBEB-4D75-967F-4BED79BBBCAE@consulintel.es>
To: JORDI PALET MARTINEZ <jordi.palet@consulintel.es>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3439)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/PT9iq2GA3mudAuk3pIIoBooTlxo>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] Incremental Deployment of IPv6-only Wi-Fi for IETF Meetings
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2017 08:22:21 -0000


> On Jul 17, 2017, at 10:17 AM, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ <jordi.palet@consulintel.es> wrote:
> 
> In the real world, you will not disable IPv4 in the LANs of end-users or enterprise customers (at least not now, may be in 3-5 years from now). This is what IETF need to test now. IPv6 only with IPv4 as a service (which is 464XLAT).

In the real world, there are networks that are doing this now.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email