Re: [v6ops] I-D Action: draft-ietf-v6ops-transition-comparison-01.txt

Gabor LENCSE <lencse@hit.bme.hu> Sat, 16 October 2021 18:48 UTC

Return-Path: <lencse@hit.bme.hu>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FF523A08EC for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 16 Oct 2021 11:48:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id a8EFW1f2DT8b for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 16 Oct 2021 11:48:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frogstar.hit.bme.hu (frogstar.hit.bme.hu [IPv6:2001:738:2001:4020::2c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7AE723A08EB for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Sat, 16 Oct 2021 11:48:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.148] (host-79-121-40-197.kabelnet.hu [79.121.40.197]) (authenticated bits=0) by frogstar.hit.bme.hu (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id 19GImXS3084418 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO) for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Sat, 16 Oct 2021 20:48:39 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from lencse@hit.bme.hu)
X-Authentication-Warning: frogstar.hit.bme.hu: Host host-79-121-40-197.kabelnet.hu [79.121.40.197] claimed to be [192.168.1.148]
Message-ID: <bfb9c1b2-c7cb-552b-9923-e78a30d93e54@hit.bme.hu>
Date: Sat, 16 Oct 2021 20:48:28 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.2.0
Content-Language: en-US
To: v6ops@ietf.org
References: <163440929519.18011.8966254917234889249@ietfa.amsl.com>
From: Gabor LENCSE <lencse@hit.bme.hu>
In-Reply-To: <163440929519.18011.8966254917234889249@ietfa.amsl.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.103.2 at frogstar.hit.bme.hu
X-Virus-Status: Clean
Received-SPF: pass (frogstar.hit.bme.hu: authenticated connection) receiver=frogstar.hit.bme.hu; client-ip=79.121.40.197; helo=[192.168.1.148]; envelope-from=lencse@hit.bme.hu; x-software=spfmilter 2.001 http://www.acme.com/software/spfmilter/ with libspf2-1.2.10;
X-DCC-wuwien-Metrics: frogstar.hit.bme.hu; whitelist
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 152.66.248.44
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/PVT984uoAmeAlQRc9ELgZRnQnA4>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] I-D Action: draft-ietf-v6ops-transition-comparison-01.txt
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 16 Oct 2021 18:48:51 -0000

Dear All, especially WG Chairs,

To facilitate the WGLC of our I-D, I have eliminated all unfinished 
parts by moving them into two new drafts. So, now I believe, this draft 
is ready for WGLC.

Best regards,

Gábor

p.s. I write a separate e-mail with the proper subject about one of the 
new drafts.  (The other one is currently a stub, I used it for providing 
reference to the later work.)

On 10/16/2021 8:34 PM, internet-drafts@ietf.org wrote:
> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
> This draft is a work item of the IPv6 Operations WG of the IETF.
>
>          Title           : Pros and Cons of IPv6 Transition Technologies for IPv4aaS
>          Authors         : Gabor Lencse
>                            Jordi Palet Martinez
>                            Lee Howard
>                            Richard Patterson
>                            Ian Farrer
> 	Filename        : draft-ietf-v6ops-transition-comparison-01.txt
> 	Pages           : 31
> 	Date            : 2021-10-16
>
> Abstract:
>     Several IPv6 transition technologies have been developed to provide
>     customers with IPv4-as-a-Service (IPv4aaS) for ISPs with an IPv6-only
>     access and/or core network.  All these technologies have their
>     advantages and disadvantages, and depending on existing topology,
>     skills, strategy and other preferences, one of these technologies may
>     be the most appropriate solution for a network operator.
>
>     This document examines the five most prominent IPv4aaS technologies
>     considering a number of different aspects to provide network
>     operators with an easy to use reference to assist in selecting the
>     technology that best suits their needs.
>
>
> The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-v6ops-transition-comparison/
>
> There is also an htmlized version available at:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-v6ops-transition-comparison-01
>
> A diff from the previous version is available at:
> https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-v6ops-transition-comparison-01
>
>
> Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
> ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> v6ops mailing list
> v6ops@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops