Re: [v6ops] IETF 101 Agenda development

"Templin, Fred L" <Fred.L.Templin@boeing.com> Thu, 22 February 2018 16:12 UTC

Return-Path: <Fred.L.Templin@boeing.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E2EE12D86B for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 22 Feb 2018 08:12:25 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id g3h33wg4WyGJ for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 22 Feb 2018 08:12:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: from phx-mbsout-01.mbs.boeing.net (phx-mbsout-01.mbs.boeing.net [130.76.184.178]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F09E712E3AE for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Thu, 22 Feb 2018 08:12:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by phx-mbsout-01.mbs.boeing.net (8.14.4/8.14.4/DOWNSTREAM_MBSOUT) with SMTP id w1MGCNPc016769; Thu, 22 Feb 2018 09:12:23 -0700
Received: from XCH15-06-11.nw.nos.boeing.com (xch15-06-11.nw.nos.boeing.com [137.136.239.220]) by phx-mbsout-01.mbs.boeing.net (8.14.4/8.14.4/UPSTREAM_MBSOUT) with ESMTP id w1MGCKf0016628 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Thu, 22 Feb 2018 09:12:20 -0700
Received: from XCH15-06-08.nw.nos.boeing.com (2002:8988:eede::8988:eede) by XCH15-06-11.nw.nos.boeing.com (2002:8988:efdc::8988:efdc) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1347.2; Thu, 22 Feb 2018 08:12:19 -0800
Received: from XCH15-06-08.nw.nos.boeing.com ([137.136.238.222]) by XCH15-06-08.nw.nos.boeing.com ([137.136.238.222]) with mapi id 15.00.1347.000; Thu, 22 Feb 2018 08:12:19 -0800
From: "Templin, Fred L" <Fred.L.Templin@boeing.com>
To: Fred Baker <fredbaker.ietf@gmail.com>, V6 Ops List <v6ops@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [v6ops] IETF 101 Agenda development
Thread-Index: AQHTqnygFefNuPSctEaGoghaWbfS76Owl3+g
Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2018 16:12:19 +0000
Message-ID: <a36fc81ba9294a17979cf7d3c2ee77e0@XCH15-06-08.nw.nos.boeing.com>
References: <217739E3-9852-4B71-A2F6-DF9A5BAF9F8C@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <217739E3-9852-4B71-A2F6-DF9A5BAF9F8C@gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [137.136.248.6]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-TM-AS-MML: disable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/PZiJQhCapcnhEhINOZ7vtpY9O2g>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] IETF 101 Agenda development
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2018 16:12:26 -0000

Fred,

> -----Original Message-----
> From: v6ops [mailto:v6ops-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Fred Baker
> Sent: Tuesday, February 20, 2018 10:57 AM
> To: V6 Ops List <v6ops@ietf.org>
> Subject: [v6ops] IETF 101 Agenda development
> 
> The chairs are pulling together the agenda for IETF 101.
> 
> We have a proposed talk from Mythic Beasts, which is a data center operation that is focused on IPv6-only operation using Raspberry
> Pi platforms (they have IPv4 for customers, but charge for addresses, where IPv6 addresses are free, and they find customers willing
> to go IPv6-only when money comes into the discussion), and two working group drafts. Fred Templin has been suggesting draft-
> templin-v6ops-pdhost as a working group draft, but we see little responding discussion, and infer that the working group doesn't find
> enough of value in the draft to support it.

Since IETF100, there have been 50 or so messages on the list under the thread
"draft-templin-v6ops-pdhost a working group draft". Some people (including
you) asked for draft updates, so I made those. Others expressed interest in
seeing the code, so I jumped through the hoops it takes to get code released
from my employer and posted that. I don't know how to interpret the recent
silence, but the number of list messages since IETF100  has been considerable.

Fred

 

> If you have a document to update (Jen and Russ, that's you) or a new document to post for discussion, now would be the time to do
> it. The draft cut-off is Monday 2018-03-05, two weeks hence, and the chairs will be looking for email traffic on drafts posted to see
> whether there is working group interest.
> 
> WG: Unupdated WG Document
> 	2017-10-09	draft-ietf-v6ops-conditional-ras
> 
> WG: Updated WG Document
> 	2018-01-02	draft-ietf-v6ops-ipv6rtr-reqs
> 
> Individual Submission: Unupdated
> 	2017-10-30	draft-palet-v6ops-ipv6-only
> 	2017-10-30	draft-shytyi-v6ops-danir
> 	2017-10-29	draft-palet-v6ops-he-reporting
> 	2017-10-29	draft-palet-v6ops-p2p-from-customer-prefix
> 	2017-10-17	draft-palet-v6ops-rfc7084-bis-transition
> 	2017-10-17	draft-xli-v6ops-cernet-deployment
> 	2017-10-09	draft-palet-v6ops-464xlat-deployment
> 	2017-08-28	draft-xu-v6ops-dslite-redundancy
> 
> Individual Submission: Updated
> 	2017-12-19	draft-templin-v6ops-pdhost