Re: [v6ops] EIGRP and the Design Choices draft

"Fred Baker (fred)" <fred@cisco.com> Tue, 12 May 2015 00:26 UTC

Return-Path: <fred@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03A031B2AB6 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 11 May 2015 17:26:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -114.511
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-114.511 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4fas4vLjBQ1J for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 11 May 2015 17:26:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from alln-iport-2.cisco.com (alln-iport-2.cisco.com [173.37.142.89]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CF9581B2AB2 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Mon, 11 May 2015 17:26:52 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=2652; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1431390412; x=1432600012; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=H9hN9GlTKCObbfp4tCWhgHxITuw4PcJHOtvXfeSRTRs=; b=b/3KwKUQK9gpi7JGK5u+hdR4xQ9nV1EAqpyio6qPZFjgui1CMrLhsMyp kXYgjxYjB+EbolQPHQe2n6fzc3LyvqgaO6KfCphoP35Xwqnsb4aFqJJ2v 8WhSozpzi60inlDWg6XyRxzp0QrgtokhXKcN9/3lAU1zCTmGCmpBsHnlX c=;
X-Files: signature.asc : 487
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0BQBACiR1FV/5xdJa1cgw9UXgbEeAmBVIYJAoE5OBQBAQEBAQEBgQqEIAEBAQMBeQULAgEIGC4hESUCBA4FDogJAwoIDcNnDYURAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBEwSLOYJNgjgHgxeBFgWSPYIFgTxdhHCBVYEkhlaHbYZwI2GBJR+BUm8BgUSBAQEBAQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.13,411,1427760000"; d="asc'?scan'208";a="149199733"
Received: from rcdn-core-5.cisco.com ([173.37.93.156]) by alln-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP; 12 May 2015 00:26:52 +0000
Received: from xhc-rcd-x15.cisco.com (xhc-rcd-x15.cisco.com [173.37.183.89]) by rcdn-core-5.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id t4C0QpvD015848 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Tue, 12 May 2015 00:26:52 GMT
Received: from xmb-rcd-x09.cisco.com ([169.254.9.148]) by xhc-rcd-x15.cisco.com ([173.37.183.89]) with mapi id 14.03.0195.001; Mon, 11 May 2015 19:26:51 -0500
From: "Fred Baker (fred)" <fred@cisco.com>
To: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Thread-Topic: [v6ops] EIGRP and the Design Choices draft
Thread-Index: AQHQjEpXjlt1NCr7O0ao6Uml7l8H1Q==
Date: Tue, 12 May 2015 00:26:51 +0000
Message-ID: <4E8599FE-FF80-4556-9434-4E62BEB8501F@cisco.com>
References: <E1B62D40-18AE-47D6-9D3F-27F9300AE4B9@magma.ca> <555112D8.3000008@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <555112D8.3000008@gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.19.64.124]
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_E528745B-038E-4DAE-9DB9-EC63974B017B"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha1"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/PbKHV5v3nt-D7-XBeozHCtg8wwE>
Cc: v6ops list <v6ops@ietf.org>, Philip Matthews <philip_matthews@magma.ca>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] EIGRP and the Design Choices draft
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 May 2015 00:26:58 -0000

> On May 11, 2015, at 1:36 PM, Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 12/05/2015 03:38, Philip Matthews wrote:
>> Folks:
>> 
>> Victor and I have been talking with the chairs about the Design Choices draft, and have convinced us act on a request from Michael Ackermann to extend the Design Choices draft to cover EIGRP.
> 
> If I'm not mistaken, that's a proprietary protocol that isn't even described in an
> RFC (although there seems to be a stalled draft under consideration as an
> Independent Submission RFC). While I don't object to describing reality, I think
> you need to explain *why* it's appropriate to do this in an IETF stream draft.

How would you characterize Babel? Read the header on page 1 of RFC 6126 before responding. This difference, as near as I can tell, is that the draft made it through the ISE to RFC. That and the fact that a whole lot more people use EIGRP (enough to have it requested during a WGLC discussion) than use Babel.

draft-boutier-babel-source-specific-00.txt
draft-chroboczek-babel-doesnt-care-00.txt
draft-chroboczek-babel-extension-mechanism-04.txt
draft-chroboczek-babel-security-considerations-00.txt
draft-mrw-homenet-rtg-comparison-02.txt

https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6126
6126 The Babel Routing Protocol. J. Chroboczek. April 2011. (Format:
     TXT=99833 bytes) (Updated by RFC7298) (Status: EXPERIMENTAL)

https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7298
7298 Babel Hashed Message Authentication Code (HMAC) Cryptographic
     Authentication. D. Ovsienko. July 2014. (Format: TXT=128503 bytes)
     (Updates RFC6126) (Status: EXPERIMENTAL)