IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" scenarios

Richard Patterson <richard@helix.net.nz> Wed, 20 February 2019 11:21 UTC

Return-Path: <richard@helix.net.nz>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 911BB128CF2 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 20 Feb 2019 03:21:38 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.902
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.902 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=helix-net-nz.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id h6aKBJy0lJc9 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 20 Feb 2019 03:21:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-yw1-xc32.google.com (mail-yw1-xc32.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::c32]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0F7FB12D7F8 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Wed, 20 Feb 2019 03:21:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-yw1-xc32.google.com with SMTP id u200so9041565ywu.10 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Wed, 20 Feb 2019 03:21:37 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=helix-net-nz.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=tQPMKswkSnCYlPdLaynIVfKpjJEc8xQH2jlzxIFWwJc=; b=A9g9KpzxfEo5aDYB08TvIjnxWhefUKmUS+dRiNcs7c9yv+lL1i/JbyCbc6n21WM6Nu a9EbBQJcxTHI/08nLpvRKq2S89hgY5j9PCZD+rUSltDbELdnfWowG+3+e+RT13GiN6Ea qTr24NWCFTEGSWTA+clg0tQd+x3ulbTcsyutv7F0LfLaV0qaHrHgs0LhqORPjdwy/TQJ 6CPL54laqPjY3tSy151si9Es7SPa4nfqYqezHuWJjzQDByBYkZgwlYtWK9Sgqfmq1feK 74V2vjcef22rkRR/l6DzAr1reUmhmcNUdWAUBJEILW4+an3VypJMO5JVE1wmK43wohH0 LAXg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=tQPMKswkSnCYlPdLaynIVfKpjJEc8xQH2jlzxIFWwJc=; b=rw2ObhplN14yamizHB3rIrN7Om+TlPn4jD+1tt9QzGTmv8AGzzwZQx73+ioBPrajNK m3C2Cftc514FSa+qWPakHRsk/yULJoNiK70cKDipPhtxYZhi4xcIfyToGYC1OUFFUPlb V+y7/AYGpvbUwaxFxDgn1kQJSYYkHgjn3d1T8mUTfcsiLJbJdPEzt84hcoZ0e08PEntC xvyHVQDOdUiop+qjGrQukaetvK/7SOtUnzjGG8L73gbGdN2EDJgXXpumjaZQId9vfAqB wecAegP2DaJWnh2EBxDQdP6DnLEIYEB493ORdwzoZ3PpxssKR7AAndLrtesIVi+xuSK7 ZW0g==
X-Gm-Message-State: AHQUAuZXuky7ZluGjSYv7WEC3M4IEqDFcNwMvCopmWhMzglSpUYk+vwA kSCluZ+hqHvuqnEpMfgxFj7RipD9Rvo=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AHgI3IZpdiqnpOyh+glKEDvJ0dW2Tg6Fi92FiTFHMvMoQheWrIWjhJ6yiGaBCHLp0vqHcNp5/9kYYw==
X-Received: by 2002:a81:3508:: with SMTP id c8mr27369541ywa.497.1550661696150; Wed, 20 Feb 2019 03:21:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-yb1-f169.google.com (mail-yb1-f169.google.com. [209.85.219.169]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id x84sm7113157ywb.5.2019.02.20.03.21.35 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 20 Feb 2019 03:21:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-yb1-f169.google.com with SMTP id 18so7814194ybf.8; Wed, 20 Feb 2019 03:21:35 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 2002:a25:4e05:: with SMTP id c5mr26332735ybb.389.1550661695217; Wed, 20 Feb 2019 03:21:35 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <60fabe4b-fd76-4b35-08d3-09adce43dd71@si6networks.com> <alpine.DEB.2.20.1901311236320.5601@uplift.swm.pp.se> <35adea8e-704a-76f2-857f-a83a9ad689ef@si6networks.com> <CAFU7BAS1_veTu-ZXAF0MF4niJwz149nGipx3ep_6fh1bewOzgg@mail.gmail.com> <d9503983-6524-a13a-2cb0-cdcb95f76ea6@si6networks.com> <CAFU7BAQfg712UfgW9wi9pd3eVeZP9cqJEXd6=FDmchuSdauv+g@mail.gmail.com> <82c00442-bbc4-581b-2054-2d02d50d20ad@si6networks.com> <CAFU7BASDgmSwY=SLiabSqyiTOphxU0COtFLQvT8drm0iTxM+-Q@mail.gmail.com> <CAHL_VyDf5Dnh+2uE1=V3DL2P4vABSZ4dR8oOOveBzf2Fmj0xXA@mail.gmail.com> <27cc7a26-1ce1-38cf-4fc8-35032cf757dc@foobar.org>
In-Reply-To: <27cc7a26-1ce1-38cf-4fc8-35032cf757dc@foobar.org>
From: Richard Patterson <richard@helix.net.nz>
Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2019 11:21:24 +0000
X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: <CAHL_VyDCSVXLops3qrnkGY0EhE4kb-8ww1kJEZ4E-7+Qdc4byQ@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAHL_VyDCSVXLops3qrnkGY0EhE4kb-8ww1kJEZ4E-7+Qdc4byQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Nick Hilliard <nick@foobar.org>
Cc: IPv6 Operations <v6ops@ietf.org>, "6man@ietf.org" <6man@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/PjTlgBfLvxKiSvPmbK5ZMSRzEtk>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" scenarios
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2019 11:21:39 -0000

On Wed, 20 Feb 2019 at 11:08, Nick Hilliard <nick@foobar.org> wrote:
>
> Richard Patterson wrote on 20/02/2019 10:51:
> > That's what having a stable ULA prefix is useful for!
>
> Add some NAT on the CPE and this entire problem goes away!

Now why didn't I think of that? :)

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email