Re: [v6ops] IETF 110 agenda development

Fred Baker <fredbaker.ietf@gmail.com> Fri, 12 February 2021 22:20 UTC

Return-Path: <fredbaker.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F1A03A0FFA for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 12 Feb 2021 14:20:54 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nqSGTFy1Kmc9 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 12 Feb 2021 14:20:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pf1-x433.google.com (mail-pf1-x433.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::433]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BFEA93A0FF6 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Fri, 12 Feb 2021 14:20:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pf1-x433.google.com with SMTP id d26so376725pfn.5 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Fri, 12 Feb 2021 14:20:52 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date:in-reply-to:cc:to :references; bh=yA1M5vkeIsGg03SgbUOxVweQojPPdXDB8ZcAETR9054=; b=dMB90mlfejKY7KwgZVDxV4MM27Bgae29hXDQYPc0VU4vtXFyFJsvgza3rg2KwRatrO P8Sv4jT2CzBoz6wn4PAUDjXU4qzyQes6QlysgMD7BDjulgAxjZG2AN+V+qeydsiEbylm wdKUTkzRDoB6q3c4TX/N4CbsXLs2yvf0J3ejFhjPpkLAb7NZPf/qQOtLVTHcOK971iQ7 dCUzy+xkiUpdByzybWtSwTlgU9ciKpXGzm4jqVz3YRQRGXng+kSTqxH2Kex5IXU0sNNc nlSnbHc7JtmOoSisHx5FE2u0jpKhCKX3M4zCsf9f4QXCgGIK1n3smDy4Q0RW2sGUmGIb pEUw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date :in-reply-to:cc:to:references; bh=yA1M5vkeIsGg03SgbUOxVweQojPPdXDB8ZcAETR9054=; b=LsH0s0tln6vlcqlkQr94wOmIYHmGzJ4rjnNluiJmI0VvLXMR/GB1wKaERPsCK4B4v4 K9jgjswIuiIiU6gQ9mWChSmVwwG3OiYApydq73tYe0osKMjPPLVtWkhel7IguoTLGEYt UYzpxn9eVFeacq/Po2bkMpsCW3FSBmucKWOTJayC8ViKzIImHF6oKd/u8zJx7xaLljqK /iMZoq0NzN6laEJsia3OaQe+Yw7DDaJAvN6DyN2D3NteHfSftEtufz3kXplLT3cQ0d8Z zgLECW0snQsU0HA5IZlVsoN96HjL9g02DXo4LjbPNJ8qUgfzRvKP2bNl4q8LturcCd+7 l99w==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530J2BmPy+7RQIY4svW3q/5yFQxp8OzDhmjlBwhMOzFc3JEdCgY3 hFKfWc5pWtKtT4wfgcCQNMs=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzAKeXtbiXkuN83tC2iDCj3noH/f5XJd2Mp6EHysZY2+b2MxyCotNHtqiqpIbLjsWuXWw33dw==
X-Received: by 2002:a63:f95b:: with SMTP id q27mr5277097pgk.82.1613168450418; Fri, 12 Feb 2021 14:20:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtpclient.apple ([2600:8802:5800:567::1032]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id iq6sm8609049pjb.6.2021.02.12.14.20.49 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 12 Feb 2021 14:20:49 -0800 (PST)
From: Fred Baker <fredbaker.ietf@gmail.com>
Message-Id: <FCDE57B7-C6B7-4D93-95F8-4E0E2CB1C114@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_B7D6AC9A-08E6-4D06-8254-EF386F771019"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha512
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 14.0 \(3654.80.0.2.10\))
Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2021 14:20:48 -0800
In-Reply-To: <a3611325c0b54028aed8a30e4d458458@huawei.com>
Cc: IPv6 Operations <v6ops@ietf.org>, Paolo Volpato <paolo.volpato@huawei.com>, Nalini Elkins <nalini.elkins@insidethestack.com>, Sebastien Lourdez <sebastien.lourdez@post.lu>
To: Giuseppe Fioccola <giuseppe.fioccola@huawei.com>
References: <721A9345-0CDA-43A3-9E72-7CFB17797F41@gmail.com> <a3611325c0b54028aed8a30e4d458458@huawei.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3654.80.0.2.10)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/Q7G0ZMiWl6my4VkZm4dp2mLKkDQ>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] IETF 110 agenda development
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2021 22:20:54 -0000

Thanks. You can review existing discussion at https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/search/?qdr=a&q=%22draft-vf-v6ops-ipv6-deployment%22t%22. You have, if counting on my fingers works, ten days to get the draft posted and trigger some discussion. I might suggest that when you post it, you try to actively trigger that discussion, perhaps by asking (out of band) specific "Industrial Internet, Enterprise and Cloud Providers" to comment on it.

> On Feb 11, 2021, at 6:33 AM, Giuseppe Fioccola <giuseppe.fioccola@huawei.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi Fred, Ron, All,
> We want to inform you that we are working to update our draft on IPv6 deployment (https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-vf-v6ops-ipv6-deployment/), in particular we plan to include additional considerations about IPv6 in Industrial Internet, Enterprise and Cloud Providers, which were not covered in the previous version.
> 
> Feedback and suggestions are more than welcome.
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Giuseppe
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: v6ops [mailto:v6ops-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Fred Baker
> Sent: Saturday, January 9, 2021 7:16 PM
> To: IPv6 Operations <v6ops@ietf.org>
> Subject: [v6ops] IETF 110 agenda development
> 
> You can find the important dates for IETF 110 at https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/important-dates/. It will be held virtually, as the last several have. It was intended to be held in Prague (and I was looking forward to Prague), and so will be timed as if it were in that timezone.
> 
> I mention the dates page, as that page indicates that the draft cut-off is 2021-02-22. If you want to get a document in to discuss in March, it needs to be in by then, and enough earlier to allow some discussion on the list prior to Ron and I having to concoct and agenda.