IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] New Version Notification for draft-yourtchenko-ra-dhcpv6-comparison-00.txt (fwd)

Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com> Thu, 19 December 2013 14:11 UTC

Return-Path: <lorenzo@google.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A7B41AD9A9 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 19 Dec 2013 06:11:12 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.916
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.916 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.538, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Swi2wOcuOiDK for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 19 Dec 2013 06:11:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ig0-x229.google.com (mail-ig0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c05::229]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9B311A1F66 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Thu, 19 Dec 2013 06:11:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ig0-f169.google.com with SMTP id hk11so12001871igb.0 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Thu, 19 Dec 2013 06:11:08 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=vnhq1RYpoaqysmc1kO1kmsmQKhseK6ELEf1YUNK5QiQ=; b=Q8HvXADbtfqhchQbOVRX5HbcZYl3J+I4Qn6o1T813JPF+uptS6UbzpgsrwDo/+8iLg oGrCdZl5N9KhOUzuizV1xCs2UiEf1c/XJfMg3KLejpsKkwB7b9qs+J+lywKTNiy83Ml3 ixFuVMF78T2IDS22GVwwDIJDlvISqZg6E5F1H1cXuUtyxm6dyfAGe9AbBNDz9RZVMbvl sbPeDVdWAKFtPHVsF1kspqSrVYTua/5kSXjT9WYiYMOTatyLXKy/XvUivF0+53U5xFc8 aYLdG+ylY8zSoObs6+2++h6VUh1HdCEhmtKFaYRCOzZVF1sg0rOWtKDHnFdbVtfGkAzj wxqA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=vnhq1RYpoaqysmc1kO1kmsmQKhseK6ELEf1YUNK5QiQ=; b=IZxwiRC/rmTe5MBd5S3BSppTD4Rcq8cTCPegnXkhc9AFNuWdVsQCxT8vIjxURCcWOZ Am7I66Q+uRlzvXbj8zkIwOBJrt3XsJFrT87O8o3F5AzuNcp7uA+NfVNTTy1rmnS7R9Z1 HA2xOPVjXfclzMoqcYYTLxu+hv7wjd4pNzqnQAY8uZRZySz4OW8n2A5mfbdponEuJhKM Sn77jpfe55QcUT+gE4K9z0qnx/JQhrRLgFsWoWXT5+H+6yTZ/qlV4zNwgbwey4dCyxyA +zjQw/shhkEJaNxmCGhOVbHmLYCbvVnwMmtdY6rLTOYd9K1GZSbhFF3Uti0560laAbZS p2cA==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQm8JRFl6ab/oHa6ypNhouTXwGh92nulvIjvkiGdPNgL3HVOZ1tMKPjokUeZJMFOn7VWQZZIdCKfekmT2YJSk40K7gRrCsNJWlC1jRnTvAZ+nVepWC03ucAGVQtKkDFwlbQNgYngQ4weB2iqyd9aOc4CAkMhI4P/c5FDqWnAp5gPl2zTCnLGGnyUhPEuFC0P9u2vaxNK
X-Received: by 10.50.176.137 with SMTP id ci9mr2840871igc.31.1387462268801; Thu, 19 Dec 2013 06:11:08 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.64.7.36 with HTTP; Thu, 19 Dec 2013 06:10:48 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <6F8010C6-D8A3-49F9-AEA2-67527DCC02E3@nominum.com>
References: <alpine.OSX.2.00.1311271353550.3903@ayourtch-mac> <1386274786.29351.YahooMailNeo@web142501.mail.bf1.yahoo.com> <alpine.OSX.2.00.1312060759220.68814@ayourtch-mac> <1386378082.99914.YahooMailNeo@web161901.mail.bf1.yahoo.com> <alpine.OSX.2.00.1312072028290.68814@ayourtch-mac> <F024FF5B-35A6-4221-952C-4A730A68C59D@delong.com> <D437C864-F276-46A6-A51E-4C57E5CF829E@cisco.com> <52B22828.6080700@inex.ie> <CAKD1Yr3TA9+yDpCRHNMOXNiq0bZ0x-yn=kVotiFD2187GjdnWw@mail.gmail.com> <52B2ED1E.1040108@inex.ie> <CAKD1Yr2hQBB_gsv6=zRLq6SmxF6JG=o2DT=-iDykSz7u=yJVZg@mail.gmail.com> <273B4FE5-E311-4327-8B04-13467AF9D72F@nominum.com> <CAKD1Yr3aeHu=4wy8NcRvT_bX9OdCE5PZ-JqJGZrxgVsi+uOK4w@mail.gmail.com> <6F8010C6-D8A3-49F9-AEA2-67527DCC02E3@nominum.com>
From: Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2013 23:10:48 +0900
Message-ID: <CAKD1Yr3qfZqFp-FuStvOz9uqidPU0TEMuC=O-VvZZVEXAo9bUQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Ted Lemon <ted.lemon@nominum.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="089e0111e0daabf5f404ede3bb6a"
Cc: "v6ops@ietf.org WG" <v6ops@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] New Version Notification for draft-yourtchenko-ra-dhcpv6-comparison-00.txt (fwd)
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2013 14:11:12 -0000

On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 11:05 PM, Ted Lemon <ted.lemon@nominum.com> wrote:

> I'm not saying we should try to solve it here, merely pointing out that
> the case you are making has wider implications, and that in fact even with
> RA, your hosts will be happier if you are running VRRP during the outage
> scenario you describe.
>

In homenet, what needs to be solved that can't be solved with fast NUD
timers and RAs from multiple routers. You don't need subsecond convergence
in the home, right?

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email