IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] Discussion focus: draft-ietf-v6ops-ipv6rtr-reqs

<7riw77@gmail.com> Thu, 04 January 2018 22:28 UTC

Return-Path: <7riw77@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51CF71242F5 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 4 Jan 2018 14:28:54 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.45
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.45 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZqNi9U43SVk7 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 4 Jan 2018 14:28:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-yw0-x233.google.com (mail-yw0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c05::233]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 416751201FA for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Thu, 4 Jan 2018 14:28:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-yw0-x233.google.com with SMTP id x199so1142346ywg.5 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Thu, 04 Jan 2018 14:28:52 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:references:in-reply-to:subject:date:message-id :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-language :thread-index; bh=i9y0VgPgum0LZRlTsqktbVfH1U/YvVg+gejs/r0QHPQ=; b=loRrHhOpvQKbswDQW9paQ2wBWNzwyh07cKJUTOkUM1i3dbqII/dBrd3Mu/FVRR2g+p CHGPAktIjsdLpz3YXRHoxR7EJaXEcWajZeGW8bW2Yd/i3hf5uWRIn2pBaBY/f0G63z9r cf0BTqqq6RxML3sV9wqcCyK5YaLyJVpSxckdR8JM0ljkq5pmgParjwnuhRowZinqIS5v Nfr+eASkOxyFEHvnsoDtm6RJ30ei9TBhsl4ncINcnj3Fmo0IxfuQVuW+A0ZS+4MIiIXa HddSz7VEL8CIWsDQz+675D3BluozR8niuz1FSkT8IfHy9xSTH0KHb+RdRYOCEqa1unWX 3hVw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:references:in-reply-to:subject:date :message-id:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-language :thread-index; bh=i9y0VgPgum0LZRlTsqktbVfH1U/YvVg+gejs/r0QHPQ=; b=YUsOs3uBn8/CCfMmiasq3wLuzMnURa03E4IZ7yzitZCDz2L+GrMyF66eUfDJJtZftR skpZLJGpoLNPEJ7rzqf0nSrBgYNC8jVril9zafmmxTd8co3wUsHsyxV+ZJJFOnnqRZCH QFG+gOWzPWWsE6Nyjjrvbf8qdHKqF6u9kSWUWN/IZ/u+I6oSbfhR/WH3une0YApBWNaa eDEmMLDO1hY2oD9P4xyMQjDtChV8W9JHH2ElpIF6vf8QO7C3fG5d+jhQO8NytLK1y4dE lmoN++a7qX8PPIDSRvUhg4gpWw3+UTpDvwhGfJezfgON5S0vmGFXc5u1oH3/tXdbG/qG HH3Q==
X-Gm-Message-State: AKGB3mLG+J6Zh09CZXEgIc90hXTRk8XJ+E0TpPF5fgzRkhIE/OkUHdDZ yX6+totbjGM+v0gypD1DjmM=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACJfBot7lesALHrJwaRFva0GhDRfXZAFxcQ9KFODXcZE1x9Wm1nwqlLLqMzCusVUM+FaeB0LtnnI6Q==
X-Received: by 10.13.246.1 with SMTP id g1mr1023464ywf.476.1515104931545; Thu, 04 Jan 2018 14:28:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: from Russ (108-78-210-25.lightspeed.chrlnc.sbcglobal.net. [108.78.210.25]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id h67sm1845823ywd.101.2018.01.04.14.28.50 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 04 Jan 2018 14:28:51 -0800 (PST)
From: 7riw77@gmail.com
To: 'Lorenzo Colitti' <lorenzo@google.com>, 'Fred Baker' <fredbaker.ietf@gmail.com>
Cc: v6ops@ietf.org
References: <B7CB2B98-F069-425D-A096-AADA0297B34C@gmail.com> <CAKD1Yr0r=OZKWHatcaV5ZfXUcJhTrzGqnd6wno7SLur9cJzF5w@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAKD1Yr0r=OZKWHatcaV5ZfXUcJhTrzGqnd6wno7SLur9cJzF5w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 04 Jan 2018 17:28:48 -0500
Message-ID: <066901d385ab$64d663b0$2e832b10$@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 16.0
Content-Language: en-us
Thread-Index: AQJhq6FqXfQxKPsi9uY8X1ef5BV5bQJ9OQ9TojQVPZA=
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/QPeHFgrdiDJaxrPsMIcgHd4FnSg>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] Discussion focus: draft-ietf-v6ops-ipv6rtr-reqs
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Jan 2018 22:28:54 -0000

> As the implementer of devices that are sometimes IPv6 routers, I object to the
> requirement that such devices MUST implement DHCPv6. The reason is that
> implementing DHCPv6 will degrade the user experience.
> See https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops/current/msg26286.html
> for an example of how that can happen.

Being required to implement DHCPv6 is far different than being required to _turn it on by default_ -- the draft specifically does not require DHCPv6 to be turned on by default for this very reason. To argue that implementing something that may go haywire in a specific environment should lead to it not being implemented would doom BGP, OSPF, IS-IS, SLAAC... the list is almost endless.

😊 /r

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email