IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] IPv6 & iOS9 - interesting factoids in this Ars Technica post

Czerwonka Michał 1 - Hurt <Michal.Czerwonka1@orange.com> Thu, 18 June 2015 10:10 UTC

Return-Path: <Michal.Czerwonka1@orange.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F20ED1B3116 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 18 Jun 2015 03:10:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 1.035
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.035 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HELO_EQ_PL=1.135, HOST_EQ_PL=1.95, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id aw5DVjMLksHQ for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 18 Jun 2015 03:10:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailin.tpsa.pl (mailout.tpsa.pl [212.160.172.10]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F224C1B3113 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Thu, 18 Jun 2015 03:10:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 10.236.62.152 (EHLO OPE10HT02.tp.gk.corp.tepenet) ([10.236.62.152]) by mailin.tpsa.pl (MOS 4.4.2a-FCS FastPath queued) with ESMTP id DSO23171; Thu, 18 Jun 2015 12:10:06 +0200 (CEST)
From: Czerwonka Michał 1 - Hurt <Michal.Czerwonka1@orange.com>
To: Ross Chandler <ross@eircom.net>, Alexandru Petrescu <alexandru.petrescu@gmail.com>
Thread-Topic: [v6ops] IPv6 & iOS9 - interesting factoids in this Ars Technica post
Thread-Index: AQHQqGWYlWpJDsMry0Cck6ahVOVCo52v54uAgADuYQCAAAB7AIABChkAgAAJeoCAACIDEA==
Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2015 10:09:19 +0000
Message-ID: <2D29C51862222E49B991EF64EEB0B5B745FC06CE@OPE10MB05.tp.gk.corp.tepenet>
References: <3A1298E7-8422-4C03-8DDD-FF728C22165B@cisco.com> <alpine.DEB.2.02.1506170521210.9487@uplift.swm.pp.se> <5581B014.8070601@gmail.com> <CAD6AjGTG2GeEc18fc_F2mmaGMEde1KFjQ+GRHjHO=XHGFBqCvw@mail.gmail.com> <55828FB4.9000706@gmail.com> <53E80738-B5E7-4FF9-A37C-ADC545C52DC2@eircom.net>
In-Reply-To: <53E80738-B5E7-4FF9-A37C-ADC545C52DC2@eircom.net>
Accept-Language: pl-PL, en-US
Content-Language: pl-PL
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [126.13.107.45]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Junkmail-Premium-Raw: score=7/50, refid=2.7.2:2015.6.18.91215:17:7.944, ip=, rules=__HAS_FROM, FROM_NAME_PHRASE, __TO_MALFORMED_2, __BOUNCE_CHALLENGE_SUBJ, __BOUNCE_NDR_SUBJ_EXEMPT, __SUBJ_ALPHA_END, __IMS_MSGID, __HAS_MSGID, __SANE_MSGID, __REFERENCES, __IN_REP_TO, WEBMAIL_XOIP, __HAS_XOIP, __CT, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN, __CTE, __MIME_VERSION, WEBMAIL_X_IP_HDR, __ANY_URI, __HAS_APPLE_URI, __HTTPS_URI, __FRAUD_BODY_WEBMAIL, __URI_NO_PATH, __CP_MEDIA_BODY, __SUBJ_ALPHA_NEGATE, __FORWARDED_MSG, BODYTEXTP_SIZE_3000_LESS, BODY_SIZE_1400_1499, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY, __URI_NS, HTML_00_01, HTML_00_10, BODY_SIZE_5000_LESS, WEBMAIL_SOURCE, BODY_SIZE_2000_LESS, __FRAUD_WEBMAIL, BODY_SIZE_7000_LESS, REFERENCES
X-Junkmail-Status: score=10/50, host=mailin.tpsa.pl
X-Junkmail-Signature-Raw: score=unknown, refid=str=0001.0A0C0201.558298FE.0202, ss=1, re=0.000, recu=0.000, reip=0.000, cl=1, cld=1, fgs=0, ip=0.0.0.0, so=2012-12-31 09:39:00, dmn=2013-03-21 17:37:32, mode=multiengine
X-Junkmail-IWF: false
X-Mirapoint-Virus-RAPID-Raw: score=unknown(0), refid=str=0001.0A0C0201.558298FE.0202, ss=1, re=0.000, recu=0.000, reip=0.000, cl=1, cld=1, fgs=0, ip=0.0.0.0, so=2012-12-31 09:39:00, dmn=2013-03-21 17:37:32
X-Mirapoint-Loop-Id: 60cc2e6e17450ab81b6e66f1b3e0d282
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/QUqg1BsBEqyCWPDEqnbIY-y6dkI>
Cc: IPv6 Ops WG <v6ops@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] IPv6 & iOS9 - interesting factoids in this Ars Technica post
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2015 10:10:16 -0000

https://developer.apple.com/videos/wwdc/2015/?id=719   and get PDF

slide 26

What Works?
IPv4 address literals, in NAT64 + DNS64 networks
New for OS X 10.11 and iOS 9
Use higher-layer networking frameworks
• NSURLSession and CFNetwork-layer APIs
Client supplies IPv4 address Literal
• OS synthesizes IPv6 address

BR,
Mcz




-----Original Message-----
From: v6ops [mailto:v6ops-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Ross Chandler
Sent: Thursday, June 18, 2015 12:04 PM
To: Alexandru Petrescu
Cc: IPv6 Ops WG
Subject: Re: [v6ops] IPv6 & iOS9 - interesting factoids in this Ars Technica post


> On 18 Jun 2015, at 10:30, Alexandru Petrescu <alexandru.petrescu@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Then is it using 64share?  CLAT?
> 
> Alex

I don’t see any mention of the 464xlat CLAT or 64share in their presentation. 

Single IPv6-only APN designs for handset and tethered IPv4 traffic don’t seem to be supported yet. 

Ross
_______________________________________________
v6ops mailing list
v6ops@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email