IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] I-D Action: draft-ietf-v6ops-ula-usage-recommendations-02.txt

Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se> Thu, 06 March 2014 13:33 UTC

Return-Path: <swmike@swm.pp.se>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED7BC1A0129 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 6 Mar 2014 05:33:55 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.398
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.398 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HELO_EQ_SE=0.35, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.547, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id s2ATiP4KsXhb for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 6 Mar 2014 05:33:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: from uplift.swm.pp.se (swm.pp.se [212.247.200.143]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E31241A019C for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Thu, 6 Mar 2014 05:33:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: by uplift.swm.pp.se (Postfix, from userid 501) id 06555A1; Thu, 6 Mar 2014 14:33:47 +0100 (CET)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by uplift.swm.pp.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id F145D9A for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Thu, 6 Mar 2014 14:33:47 +0100 (CET)
Date: Thu, 06 Mar 2014 14:33:47 +0100
From: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se>
To: "v6ops@ietf.org WG" <v6ops@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <20140225013520.5D56710401F0@rock.dv.isc.org>
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1403061431390.747@uplift.swm.pp.se>
References: <20140214091302.13219.20624.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <52FEBE28.1010006@gmail.com> <8E2A8B56-6F05-4F09-BE7E-651B9CA42458@delong.com> <5300CE32.1050808@gmail.com> <BD473E46-E382-44E6-B474-A56D074318FA@delong.com> <530104B3.3070205@gmail.com> <53010E70.5000401@gmail.com> <20140217110013.GA31822@mushkin> <62FF9B8A-2F21-4FDD-B1D2-82B8C02A21B3@delong.com> <37638184-17C6-4C8B-86B1-C596A5A5504A@nominum.com> <530242C3.4070108@bogus.com> <E91E49CA-7BA6-4DA3-B4F3-46BB0F25F8F1@delong.com> <5303CD3E.1010907@gmail.com> <m2a9dnr4vk.wl%randy@psg.com> <5304BAAF.60608@gmail.com> <53052B43.2070904@gmail.com> <CAKD1Yr2fyZ9FezX5dh=P-PiruiOqKBKO9f5hroD-CHDJS+ZMQQ@mail.gmail.com> <5305FFFD.5090708@foobar.org> <530606FB.9020707@umn.edu> <CAKD1Yr11Zs=zQsVeHyFexRYchsf6DazpGoK6n0NJvMRvpDyd9w@mail.gmail.com> <CAJc3aaMFDSoBZ4aDZTOjruwDBc_64LwWcz-8DQHqTBDKxjMnqw@mail.gmail.com> <20140225013520.5D56710401F0@rock.dv.isc.org>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.02 (DEB 1266 2009-07-14)
Organization: People's Front Against WWW
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/QcjBdrNECVffzWK4g37flKDfu34
Subject: Re: [v6ops] I-D Action: draft-ietf-v6ops-ula-usage-recommendations-02.txt
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Mar 2014 13:33:56 -0000

In 3.3, it would probably be worthwhile to mention the replacement of 
RFC3484, ie RFC6724. If hosts implement RFC6724, running ULA for IPv6 
connectivity and only having IPv4 Internet connectivity means a lot less 
breakage. If hosts implement RFC3484 then breakage will most likely be 
greater.

-- 
Mikael Abrahamsson    email: swmike@swm.pp.se

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email